On this Forum, I have seen comments to the effect that while some collectors like some glossy painted toy soldiers, they believe that World War II toy soldiers look best in matte. I would probably agree with this if we are talking about 60mm matte figures in individual non-marching poses used in dioramas; however, I hope that my previous post which displayed glossy, classic, 54mm figures marching (for the most part) demonstrates that this can make an interesting and colorful display. In fact, I believe the display looks better in glossy than it would in matte. Given that these 54mm glossy toy soldiers cost about one-third or one-fourth as much as the 60mm matte figures, this is also really a no brainer for the collector who wants to amass a large display.
ABSOLUTELY AGREE Mike. I think that the current "fashion" and popularity for Matte Toy Soldiers is fine for those that like them that way - but maybe this will swing back again one day - as economic forces continue to escalate prices. Who knows?
I just know what I like - and will continue collecting mine - the way that I like them - which just happens to be Glossy too - though I prefer to paint my own. BUT - each to his own - and if a collector wants to continue collecting his/her figures in matte - and wishes to continue paying up handsomely for the privilege, that's okay by me too! Here's an example of one of my WW2 "action" glossies. (It's a re-painted Dinkey Jeep that cost me under £5, by the way).jb
Although matte collectors seem to be a distinct majority on this Forum, there is a hard core minority of us that continues to collect glossies. However, the matte revolution started by Andy Nielson and joined by Britains, Collectors Showcase, Figarti, John Jenkins, et al, is clearly the direction the hobby is going, especially with younger collectors. I am continually amazed at the prices matte figures command and wonder how long it can continue without matte collectors cutting back on their purchases or just dropping out of the hobby.
JB your WWII glossies in action look great! They are a perfect example of how attractive glossy figures, whether marching or in action, can be.
Mike
Mike, it's nice to see you get your wonderful Hiriart collection back on display again, glad to hear that the earthquake damage wasn't anywhere near as bad as it first might have appeared. :smile2:
B.
Totally agree about having a good display of guards! But I also have to say that those Kuban Cossacks are very cool!
DAve
Hi Mike. Just curious, in the 1st picture below of your Grenadier Guards, the bottom of the picture shows part of the lower shelf which appears to have French Zouaves on it. I was wondering what make they are and time period represented. Thanks. -- Al
Mike, thanks for posting the close-up shots. They are really nice figures. Sorry I missed out on these. I have some of the Frontline 11th Hussars from the Crimea. They are some of my favorite glossies, and a bargain for the price. -- AlAl,
They are Crimean War French Zouaves from Frontline Figures which were produced in 1996. Up to that time, Frontline had been producing only glossy figures. In fact, the other sets in the Crimean War series (i.e., British infantry & cavalry and Russian infantry, cavalry & artillery) had all been done in gloss. The Zouaves were done in matte and in a different sculpting style from the others to boot. So, these were the first matte figures that Frontline produced. In the display are two six figure sets, a three figure command set, and a two figure flag & NCO set.
Mike
Mike, thanks for posting the close-up shots. They are really nice figures. Sorry I missed out on these. I have some of the Frontline 11th Hussars from the Crimea. They are some of my favorite glossies, and a bargain for the price. -- Al