New Releases for October 2021 - Age of Arthur (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
NEW RELEASES FOR OCTOBER 2021
THE AGE OF ARTHUR
THE NORMAN ARMY

William Duke of Normandy (c. 1028-1087), usually known as William the Conqueror was the first Norman King of England, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087.

In the 1050’s and early 1060’s, William became a contender for the throne of England held by the Childless Edward the Confessor, his first cousin removed.
There were other claimants. Including the powerful English earl Harold Godwinson, whom Edward had named as King on his deathbed, in January 1066.
William argued that Edward had previously promised the throne to him, and that Harold had sworn to support his claim.
Throughout the summer of 1066, William assembled an army and an invasion fleet in Normandy. This force included, in addition to troops from William’s own territories of Normandy and Maine, large numbers of mercenaries, allies and volunteers from Brittany, Northeast France and Flanders.

The Battle of Hastings took place on the 14[SUP]th[/SUP] October 1066. Although the numbers on each side were about equal, William had the advantage of having both cavalry, infantry and many archers.
Harold had only foot soldiers, and few archers. The English formed a shield wall along a ridge, and were initially so effective that the invading Norman army was repeatedly thrown back with heavy casualties.
Towards the end of the day some of William’s Breton troops panicked and fled, with some of the English troops pursuing the fleeing Bretons. These English troops who had broken ranks, were themselves attacked and destroyed by the Norman mounted knights.
Norman knights were armoured warriors that fought on horseback, with lance , sword and shield. These were the Norman “secret weapon” as nothing like them had been seen before in England. There were between 1,000-2,000 Norman knights in William’s army, and it was these troops which proved decisive to the invading army’s victory.
Two further Norman retreats were feigned, which once again drew the English into pursuit and expose them to repeated attacks by the Norman cavalry.
It appears that the decisive event was Harold’s death, of which there are differing versions which are told.
William of Jumieges claimed that Harold was killed by the Duke himself.
The Bayeux tapestry shows Harold’s death by an arrow to the eye.

We know that the English forces were deployed in a dense shieldwall formation at the top of a slope, (which newer sources suggests was Caldbec Hill), with their flanks protected by woods, and with marshy ground in front of them.

What is known about the Norman deployment, is that Duke William appears to have arranged his forces in 3 groups or “battles”. The left “battle” consisted mainly of Bretons, and was led by Alan The Red.
The Centre was held by the Normans, under direct command of the Duke, and the right was commanded by William Fitzosbern and Eustace II of Boulogne, and consisted of Frenchmen. and mercenaries from Picardy, Boulogne and Flanders.
The front lines of the invading force were made up of archers, with a secondary line of foot soldiers armed with spears and swords. The cavalry was held in reserve.
The Norman disposition of forces implies that the plan was to open the battle with archers, weakening the enemy with arrows, followed by infantry who would engage the shieldwall in close combat. The infantry would create openings in the English lines that would then be exploited by cavalry charges.
It is believed that the early barrage of arrows, probably had very little effect on the English shieldwall, due to the higher position of the English on the ridge.

nm-53_3_.jpg

nm-53_1_.jpg


NM-53
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
BRETON CAVALRY.
(3 pcs)
nm-53_2_.jpg


ANDALUSIAN CASTLE
The impact and early significance of castles in Spain can be measured by the fact that the noun “castle” (from the Latin castella meaning “castles”) forms the origin of the name of Spain’s historically most powerful kingdom: Castile. And the history of Castile –the land of castles– projects itself widely over the history of Spain,

Castles were not built only in response to hostility between Christians and Moors but also by Christian and Moorish rulers to control internal conflicts. They were also constructed by ambitious and rebellious nobles on both sides, especially in those areas far removed from immediate royal authority.

and-100_5_.jpg


and-100_1_.jpg


AND-100
THE CRUSADES,

EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
ANDALUSIAN CASTLE,
GATEHOUSE.
(6 pcs)

GATEHOUSE DIMESIONS: 4” depth x 12” length x 12 ¼” height (15 ½” including Flag)
SHIPPING CARTON SIZE:14 ½” x 15 ½” x 7”
SHIPPING CARTON WEIGHT: 6kg (13lbs)

Villages and towns frequently established themselves around castles, creating hubs that provided work for the inhabitants. In times of hostility, those inhabitants could seek protection inside the castles. In return for protection, villagers often surrendered their freedom and became vassals of the lord of the castle, creating one of the most identifiable social structures associated with this period: feudalism (in general terms, a contract whereby a king or lord allowed a vassal to use his land in return for homage and service whenever called upon).
However, in Spain, and more specifically in the medieval kingdoms of Castile, León, Navarre and Aragón, the feudal system never took firm root because of the need to encourage citizens to populate or repopulate lands on the borders with Muslim al-Andalus.
Castles were built and existing towns strengthened as centres of resistance to the threat of Muslim expansionism. In return, monarchs or nobles offered willing citizens certain inducements/privileges (e.g. ownership of land, freedom from taxation, keeping the profits of war) for settling and defending frontier zones.
These privileges –legally recorded and known as fueros or charters— differed from area to area, but in general they outlined both the obligations and freedoms of the settlers and protected them from servitude.

and-100_2_.jpg


From an early date, the main defensive wall of Spanish, especially Muslim castles had square or rectangular towers. Christian fortresses were more likely to have semi circular towers, whose advantage was that they were better to deflect stones and arrows.
The square tower still prevailed in Moorish castles into the 13[SUP]th[/SUP] and even 14[SUP]th[/SUP] centuries.
The “horseshoe arch” was another characteristic of Muslim castles, with the double horseshoe “Gate of Justice” the main entrance of the Alhambra fortress being a magnificent example.
The separate castle sections will allow for a variety of diorama set ups, varying from a full four sided castle! To a simple shelf backdrop.

Pictured below are 2 examples of how the Castle sections could be set up.
and-100_3_.jpg

Shelf Backdrop as in picture, 4” depth x 32 ½” length x 12 ¼” height (15 ½” including Flags)

and-100_4_.jpg

Movie Backdrop, 4” depth x 31” length x 12 ¼” height (15 ½” including Flags)

COMING SOON
AND-101
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
ANDALUSIAN CASTLE,
STRAIGHT WALL
PLEASE NOTE DUE TO SHIPPING LIMITATIONS, AND-101 STRAIGHT WALL WILL BE SHIPPING DECEMBER 2021

AND-102
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
ANDALUSIAN CASTLE,
CASTLE TOWER.
(2 pcs)
PLEASE NOTE DUE TO SHIPPING LIMITATIONS, AND-102 CASTLE TOWER, WILL BE SHIPPING JANUARY 2022
 
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA
THE SPANISH
The age in which El Cid lived has since been termed the “Reconquista”, or Christian reconquest of Spain from the Moors, and was one of the most colourful periods in military history.
The armies are spectacular and varied, ranging from the noble Christian Knights to the Muslim Andalusians, through to the religious zeal of the African invaders, the Almoravids and Almohads.
Although the period is often portrayed as a simple war of religion, it was in fact a great deal more complex, with Muslim commonly fighting Muslim, and Christian fighting Christians, with both sides using allies and mercenaries whenever it suited them.
This period, during the lifetime of El Cid 1040-1100AD saw the rise of heavy cavalry charges and other northern European influences, especially in the kingdoms of Aragon and Catalonia, which had the strongest links to France.
CID-02.jpg

CID-02
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
THE SPANISH,
ALVAR FANEZ MINAYA.
(3 pcs)

CID-02_2_.jpg

Alvar Fanez (died 1114AD) was a Leonese nobleman and military leader under Alfonso VI of Leon and Castile. He became the subject of legend, immortalised by the Poema de Mio Cid, into Alvar Fanez Minaya, a loyal vassal and commander under El Cid, during the latter’s exile and his conquest of Valencia.
In the “Poema de Mio Cid”, he becomes one of the main characters, and is transformed from his historical role as loyal vassal and general of Alonso VI to a simular role in the retinue of El Cid. He is written as often being given military command when Cid splits his forces, and accompanies the Cid during his exile.
He is depcted as a paragon of loyalty, not only being true to his uncle El Cid, but also unwavering in his defence of his kinsmen.
Historically he is credited with the reconquest of Guadalajara, where a Moorish tower , the “Torreon de Alvar Fanez” is named after him.

THE ALMORAVIDS
alm-15a_2_.jpg

The Almoravids, also known as the Murabits, were a fundamentalist Islamic movement of the 11[SUP]th[/SUP] and 12[SUP]th[/SUP] Centuries. Founded by Ibn Yasin, in southern Morocco, they combined devotion to Islam with a fierce military tradition, and a desire to conquer. In 1070, the Almoravids established their capital city at Marrakesh, which at the time, was little more than a mosque in the desert surrounded by the tents of the faithful.
alm-15a_1_.jpg


ALM-15A
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
THE ALMORAVIDS,
ALMORAVID STANDARD BEARER.

alm-15b_2_.jpg

alm-15b.jpg

ALM-15B

THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
THE ALMORAVIDS,
ALMORAVID STANDARD BEARER.

ANGLO SAXON/DANISH SHIELDWALL
sx-12_2_.jpg

The death of King Edward the Confessor of England in January 1066 had triggered a succession struggle in which a variety of contenders from across north-western Europe fought for the English throne. These claimants included the King of Norway, Harald Hardrada.
The Battle of Stamford Bridge took place at the village of Stamford Bridge, East Riding of Yorkshire, in England on 25 September 1066, between an English army under King Harold Godwinson and an invading Norwegian force led by King Harald Hardrada and the English king's brother Tostig Godwinson. After a bloody battle, both Hardrada and Tostig along with most of the Norwegians were killed. The battle has traditionally been presented as symbolising the end of the Viking Age,
Harold's victory over the invading Viking army was short-lived. Three days after the battle at Stamford Bridge, on 28 September, a second invasion army led by William, Duke of Normandy, landed in Pevensey Bay, Sussex, on the south coast of England. Harold had to immediately turn his troops around and force-march them southwards to intercept the Norman army. Less than three weeks after Stamford Bridge, on 14 October 1066, the English army was decisively defeated and King Harold II fell in action at the Battle of Hastings, beginning the Norman conquest of England

sx-12_1_.jpg

SX-12
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
ANGLO SAXON/ DANES.
SAXON STANDARD BEARER.

THE VIKINGS
THE VIKING “SHIELD WALL”
The formation of a shield wall (Skjaldborg in Old Norse) was a popular military tactic that was commonly used in many parts of Northern Europe, especially England and Scandinavia.
There were many slight variations of this tactic, but in general, a shield wall was a “wall of shields” formed by warriors standing in formation shoulder to shoulder, holding their shields so that they abut or overlap. Each warrior benefited from the protection of his neighbours’ shields as well as his own.
The shield-wall tactic suited inexperienced troops such as the English Fyrd or free peasant, as it did not require extraordinary skill, being essentially a shoving and fencing match with weapons.

vik-09_2_.jpg

The first three ranks of the main wall would have been made up of select warriors, such as Huscarls and Thengs, who carried heavier weapons and wore armour. The vast majority of opponents were armed with spears, which they used against the unprotected legs or faces of their opponents. Often soldiers would use their weapons to support each other by stabbing and slashing to the left or the right, rather than just ahead. Short weapons such as the ubiquitous seax could also be used in the tight quarters of the wall.

The tactic was used at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, where the relatively well-armed Saxon army attacked the army of King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway. The Vikings were not wearing as much armour, having left their chain mail behind on the ships and wearing only their helmets, and after a bloody shield wall battle, they broke and fled in panic.
The drawback of the shield-wall tactic was that, once breached, the whole affair tended to fall apart rather quickly. Relatively lightly trained fyrdmen gained morale from being shoulder-to-shoulder with their comrades, but often fled once this was compromised. Once the wall was breached, it could prove difficult or impossible to re-establish a defensive line, and panic might well set in among the defenders.
Although the importance of cavalry in the Battle of Hastings saw the end of the shield wall tactic, massed shield walls would continue to be employed right up to the end of the 12[SUP]th[/SUP] Century, especially in areas that were unsuitable for large scale mounted warfare, such as Scandinavia, and Scotland.

In the late Middle Ages, the shield was abandoned in favour of polearms carried with both hands, giving rise to pike square tactics.
vik-09_1_.jpg

VIK-09
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING STANDARD BEARER,
(2 pcs)

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
 
Dad loves this so much...
May be a big gift coming!
Maybe a surprise so shhh.

Paddy
 
Yikes! Double Yikes! The Gatehouse is $398 USD and the shipping weight is 13.25 pounds (6 kg). Age of Arthur and the El Cid offerings are going to be costly next month.
Mike
 
In the image featuring the unpainted figures depicting a a marvelous shield wall formation under duress, I believe I've spotted a few sculpts that might be included with the Viking long ship. Now I'm not sure because I'm still awaiting closer images of the six warriors that come with the long ship. It's looking now that the six figures in question are not going to be exclusive to the ship since they are shown here in the shattered shield wall formation with terrain bases. Or maybe they're not the same sculpts? Can anyone provide some clarity on this? Thank you, Joe

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top