New Releases for September 2021 - Age of Arthur (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,264
NEW RELEASES FOR SEPTEMBER 2021
THE AGE OF ARTHUR
THE NORMAN ARMY


NMPIC1-M.jpg



William Duke of Normandy (c. 1028-1087), usually known as William the Conqueror was the first Norman King of England, reigning from 1066 until his death in 1087.

In the 1050’s and early 1060’s, William became a contender for the throne of England held by the Childless Edward the Confessor, his first cousin removed.
There were other claimants. Including the powerful English earl Harold Godwinson, whom Edward had named as King on his deathbed, in January 1066.
William argued that Edward had previously promised the throne to him, and that Harold had sworn to support his claim.
Throughout the summer of 1066, William assembled an army and an invasion fleet in Normandy. This force included, in addition to troops from William’s own territories of Normandy and Maine, large numbers of mercenaries, allies and volunteers from Brittany, Northeast France and Flanders.

The Battle of Hastings took place on the 14[SUP]th[/SUP] October 1066. Although the numbers on each side were about equal, William had the advantage of having both cavalry, infantry and many archers.
Harold had only foot soldiers, and few archers. The English formed a shield wall along a ridge, and were initially so effective that the invading Norman army was repeatedly thrown back with heavy casualties.
Towards the end of the day some of William’s Breton troops panicked and fled, with some of the English troops pursuing the fleeing Bretons. These English troops who had broken ranks, were themselves attacked and destroyed by the Norman mounted knights.
Norman knights were armoured warriors that fought on horseback, with lance , sword and shield. These were the Norman “secret weapon” as nothing like them had been seen before in England. There were between 1,000-2,000 Norman knights in William’s army, and it was these troops which proved decisive to the invading army’s victory.
Two further Norman retreats were feigned, which once again drew the English into pursuit and expose them to repeated attacks by the Norman cavalry.
It appears that the decisive event was Harold’s death, of which there are differing versions which are told.
William of Jumieges claimed that Harold was killed by the Duke himself.
The Bayeux tapestry shows Harold’s death by an arrow to the eye.

nm-3233a_2_.jpg


We know that the English forces were deployed in a dense shieldwall formation at the top of a slope, (which newer sources suggests was Caldbec Hill), with their flanks protected by woods, and with marshy ground in front of them.

What is known about the Norman deployment, is that Duke William appears to have arranged his forces in 3 groups or “battles”. The left “battle” consisted mainly of Bretons, and was led by Alan The Red.
The Centre was held by the Normans, under direct command of the Duke, and the right was commanded by William Fitzosbern and Eustace II of Boulogne, and consisted of Frenchmen. and mercenaries from Picardy, Boulogne and Flanders.
The front lines of the invading force were made up of archers, with a secondary line of foot soldiers armed with spears and swords. The cavalry was held in reserve.
The Norman disposition of forces implies that the plan was to open the battle with archers, weakening the enemy with arrows, followed by infantry who would engage the shieldwall in close combat. The infantry would create openings in the English lines that would then be exploited by cavalry charges.
It is believed that the early barrage of arrows, probably had very little effect on the English shieldwall, due to the higher position of the English on the ridge.


nm-52_3_.jpg



nm-52.jpg

NM-52
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
BRETON CAVALRY.
(3 pcs)

nm-52_2_.jpg



NM-3233A.jpg

NM-3233A
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
NORMAN ARMOURED ARCHERS.
(2pcs)

NM-3233B.jpg

NM-3233B
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE NORMAN ARMY,
NORMAN ARMOURED ARCHERS.
(2pcs)

ANGLO SAXON/DANISH SHIELDWALL
sx-11_3_.jpg

The death of King Edward the Confessor of England in January 1066 had triggered a succession struggle in which a variety of contenders from across north-western Europe fought for the English throne. These claimants included the King of Norway, Harald Hardrada.

The Battle of Stamford Bridge took place at the village of Stamford Bridge, East Riding of Yorkshire, in England on 25 September 1066, between an English army under King Harold Godwinson and an invading Norwegian force led by King Harald Hardrada and the English king's brother Tostig Godwinson. After a bloody battle, both Hardrada and Tostig along with most of the Norwegians were killed. The battle has traditionally been presented as symbolising the end of the Viking Age,

Harold's victory over the invading Viking army was short-lived. Three days after the battle at Stamford Bridge, on 28 September, a second invasion army led by William, Duke of Normandy, landed in Pevensey Bay, Sussex, on the south coast of England. Harold had to immediately turn his troops around and force-march them southwards to intercept the Norman army. Less than three weeks after Stamford Bridge, on 14 October 1066, the English army was decisively defeated and King Harold II fell in action at the Battle of Hastings, beginning the Norman conquest of England

sx-11_1_.jpg

SX-11
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
ANGLO SAXON/ DANES.
SAXON EARL.
(1 pc)


sx-11_2_.jpg
 
THE VIKINGS
THE VIKING “SHIELD WALL”

The formation of a shield wall (Skjaldborg in Old Norse) was a popular military tactic that was commonly used in many parts of Northern Europe, especially England and Scandinavia.
There were many slight variations of this tactic, but in general, a shield wall was a “wall of shields” formed by warriors standing in formation shoulder to shoulder, holding their shields so that they abut or overlap. Each warrior benefited from the protection of his neighbours’ shields as well as his own.
The shield-wall tactic suited inexperienced troops such as the English Fyrd or free peasant, as it did not require extraordinary skill, being essentially a shoving and fencing match with weapons.

vik-26a_2_.jpg


The first three ranks of the main wall would have been made up of select warriors, such as Huscarls and Thengs, who carried heavier weapons and wore armour. The vast majority of opponents were armed with spears, which they used against the unprotected legs or faces of their opponents. Often soldiers would use their weapons to support each other by stabbing and slashing to the left or the right, rather than just ahead. Short weapons such as the ubiquitous seax could also be used in the tight quarters of the wall.

The tactic was used at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, where the relatively well-armed Saxon army attacked the army of King Harald Sigurdsson of Norway. The Vikings were not wearing as much armour, having left their chain mail behind on the ships and wearing only their helmets, and after a bloody shield wall battle, they broke and fled in panic.
The drawback of the shield-wall tactic was that, once breached, the whole affair tended to fall apart rather quickly. Relatively lightly trained fyrdmen gained morale from being shoulder-to-shoulder with their comrades, but often fled once this was compromised. Once the wall was breached, it could prove difficult or impossible to re-establish a defensive line, and panic might well set in among the defenders.

Although the importance of cavalry in the Battle of Hastings saw the end of the shield wall tactic, massed shield walls would continue to be employed right up to the end of the 12[SUP]th[/SUP] Century, especially in areas that were unsuitable for large scale mounted warfare, such as Scandinavia, and Scotland.

In the late Middle Ages, the shield was abandoned in favour of polearms carried with both hands, giving rise to pike square tactics.

vik-26a_1_.jpg


VIK-26A
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(1 pc)

vik-26b.jpg


VIK-26B
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(1 pc)

vik-27a.jpg


VIK-27A
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(1 pc)

vik-27b.jpg


VIK-27B
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(1 pc)

vik-28a.jpg


VIK-28A
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(2 pc)

vik-28b.jpg


VIK-28B
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIOR ,
(2 pc)
 
vik-262728a_1_.jpg



VIK-262728A
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIORS ,
(4 pc)

vik-262728a_2_.jpg


vik-262728b_1_.jpg

VIK-262728B
THE AGE OF ARTHUR,
THE VIKINGS,
VIKING WARRIORS ,
(4 pc)
vik-262728b_2_.jpg




THE CRUSADES

THE ALMORAVIDS


alm-14a_2_.jpg

The Almoravids, also known as the Murabits, were a fundamentalist Islamic movement of the 11[SUP]th[/SUP] and 12[SUP]th[/SUP] Centuries. Founded by Ibn Yasin, in southern Morocco, they combined devotion to Islam with a fierce military tradition, and a desire to conquer. In 1070, the Almoravids established their capital city at Marrakesh, which at the time, was little more than a mosque in the desert surrounded by the tents of the faithful.

alm-14a_1_.jpg



ALM-14A
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
THE ALMORAVIDS,
ALMORAVID OFFICER AND DRUMMER.
(2 pcs)


alm-14b_2_.jpg



alm-14b_1_.jpg

ALM-14B
THE CRUSADES,
EL CID AND THE RECONQUISTA,
THE ALMORAVIDS,
ALMORAVID OFFICER AND DRUMMER.
(2 pcs)



**PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL DEALER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION**
 
You said it Michael, it sure will be expensive. I am getting almost all of these

Between the Saxons, Normans, and Vikings, as well as the ACW 14th Brooklyn and 1st VA Cavalry figures I will be spending a few $$$ . . . My pre-orders have been made . . .
Mike
 
I could buy everything released this month. Restraint will be needed in bucket loads.

Gary
 
Mike it sounds like we are both going in deep this month. On the weekend I started going through my collection to cast off odds n ends to make a few bucks and make room for more JJD
Jas
 
Mike it sounds like we are both going in deep this month. On the weekend I started going through my collection to cast off odds n ends to make a few bucks and make room for more JJD
Jas

Likewise at my end. I have already cast off half of my Fur Trade figures and have decided to not pursue the El Cid figures any further. The Age of Arthur range and the ACW range is more than enough for me to collect.
Mike
 
Too many ranges, too many releases all at once. - Just can't take on those new ranges at this time, no matter how great they look.
 
Likewise at my end. I have already cast off half of my Fur Trade figures and have decided to not pursue the El Cid figures any further. The Age of Arthur range and the ACW range is more than enough for me to collect.
Mike
Yeh I am with you. But also need a few more figures for my Roman and Carthaginian ships and I will get a few Almoravid archers and spearman to take on my Normans and Crusaders.
Jas
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top