New Releases For September (1 Viewer)

I was wondering the same things...

To me, it would make sense for easier production. An open and removable canvas tops makes for endless possibilities in displays. I can picture a display with an over turned wagon, a wagon loaded with boxes and barrels, maybe a guy kneeling shooting from inside and much more.
With a top it would limit the usage to a caravan type display.
Let’s keep our fingers crossed.
Larry
 
Larry

Based on Sierra's description of the wagon ... It comes in 6 parts, it's most likely the the canvas top will come off. Also, the earlier JJD's small wagon came with a detachable top.

I just love the many display possibilities of the wagon and the pack horses {sm4}.

Bests
OD
 
Larry

Based on Sierra's description of the wagon ... It comes in 6 parts, it's most likely the the canvas top will come off. Also, the earlier JJD's small wagon came with a detachable top.

I just love the many display possibilities of the wagon and the pack horses {sm4}.

Bests
OD

Oh .... GOOD eyes OD, I didn't catch that.
So the wagon itself, the canvas top, and the 4 wheels = 6.

Larry
 
Wagon and the pack horses.....absolutely will be in my collection as soon as possible. Look extremely flexible to add to other displays than 1812. Fine job John. Keep it coming

Walt Damon
 
Sorry, to disappoint, but I think the six parts will be as follows:

Wagon
Limber
Four wheels

John's other four wheeled wagon had the limber as a part.

King's Man
 
Sorry, to disappoint, but I think the six parts will be as follows:

Wagon
Limber
Four wheels

John's other four wheeled wagon had the limber as a part.

King's Man

I'm gonna have to guess you're right...

as much as I would like the cover to come off...

I don't think it will either...

4 wheels...
1 wagon...
1 horse harness with wheels and a pinion to attach to wagon...

the same as BAL-06...

but I hope you're wrong...we'll see...

having the option for an uncovered open wagon would suit me better...
 
I'm gonna have to guess you're right...

as much as I would like the cover to come off...

I don't think it will either...

4 wheels...
1 wagon...
1 horse harness with wheels and a pinion to attach to wagon...

the same as BAL-06...

but I hope you're wrong...we'll see...

having the option for an uncovered open wagon would suit me better...


Ya' ... I think your probably right :redface2: so that might limit the use. Still a beautiful piece (at least from the picture) so we'll see what happens. Will the first person who gets one, please post what we got?

Thanks,

Larry
 
Larry...

John just sent me an email...

the ammunitions wagon was originally sculpted with a removable cover...but the factory decided it would be one piece...so it is not removeable...

John is currently working on some other wagons for different ranges that should be pretty versatile for several eras...but he sounds so busy...so many requests for this and that...

as far as 1814...John is working on some stuff that should please Chippawa collectors...all in time...

as he always tells me...

"It's easier to collect a series than to manufacture one"...
 
Larry...

John just sent me an email...

the ammunitions wagon was originally sculpted with a removable cover...but the factory decided it would be one piece...so it is not removeable...

John is currently working on some other wagons for different ranges that should be pretty versatile for several eras...but he sounds so busy...so many requests for this and that...

as far as 1814...John is working on some stuff that should please Chippawa collectors...all in time...

as he always tells me...

"It's easier to collect a series than to manufacture one"...

Sounds promising......... ^&cool
 
Mike,
as we have said many times this is the simple truth, but there is no doubt that more (appealing) sets doesn't allow people to get distracted turning their attention (and money) to some other manufacturer and collection...
 
Larry...

John just sent me an email...

the ammunitions wagon was originally sculpted with a removable cover...but the factory decided it would be one piece...so it is not removeable...

John is currently working on some other wagons for different ranges that should be pretty versatile for several eras...but he sounds so busy...so many requests for this and that...

as far as 1814...John is working on some stuff that should please Chippawa collectors...all in time...

as he always tells me...

"It's easier to collect a series than to manufacture one"...

Thanks for the scoop Mike, and ya' collecting is a tad easier, I give you a point there.

Well, I can live with that, I guess. (as if I had a choice :rolleyes:)

Still a nice looking wagon with a place in my mind already slotted.
Yes, as the 200th anniversary approaches I see a lot more offerings to go with the fantastic army’s that we have, but patience is not one of my many virtues!! :rolleyes:

Larry
 
Thanks for the scoop Mike, and ya' collecting is a tad easier, I give you a point there.

Well, I can live with that, I guess. (as if I had a choice :rolleyes:)

Still a nice looking wagon with a place in my mind already slotted.
Yes, as the 200th anniversary approaches I see a lot more offerings to go with the fantastic army’s that we have, but patience is not one of my many virtues!! :rolleyes:

Larry

An neither is Michael at times Larry :wink2::wink2::wink2:
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I miss the Snowshoe also. One of the reasons I liked this range was that I could buy just one of every set and create a complete dio/story. No need for duplicates.

Steve
 
I miss the Snowshoes!

Yeah, I miss the Snowshoe also. One of the reasons I liked this range was that I could buy just one of every set and create a complete dio/story. No need for duplicates.

Steve

I also miss Snow Shoes terribly...I really think it is one of John's best series...he picked a great battle to re-create...Indians...Frenchies...Brits...Rangers...the only thing missing is a couple of dogs...

I think these are his best Indians ever...well sculpted...colorful...and super heavy in weight...

and yes Steve...just like the Jacobites in the Culloden series...they are all "one offs" and you wouldn't want duplicates...

I always hoped John would release a few more of these sets...

one day I want to do a large scale dio with all the figures...
 

Attachments

  • CCE09092012_00000.jpg
    CCE09092012_00000.jpg
    115.2 KB · Views: 160
I have always thought that the March 1757 Raid on Fort William Henry would make a wonderful diorama using the Snowshoe Sets - total of 1,600 French and Indians in the attacking force. The British defending included our beloved 44th and at least 1 company of rangers. The action was fought in deep snow, so the sets should work and you can add in many of the Raid on Saint Francis element and buildings - the Lord Loudoun is the large sloop mentioned below that was parked on stocks immediately adjacent to the fort - it was half complete when burned, but would have supported 16 cannon. At least one of the other completed sloops the French burned had gun ports for 10 or 12 cannon. When Colonel Monro took command of the Fort in April 1757, he apparently did not attempt to reconstruct the 4 sloops lost, which might have prevented Montcalm from attacking and destroying Fort William Henry the following summer.


From the Seven Years War Page, describing the French Attack in March 1757.

On March 15, the expedition reached Fort Carillon where it took possession of the scaling-ladders.

On March 16, 100 Indians left at daybreak for reconnoitring. Meanwhile, the little French army crossed the portage to reach Lake Saint-Sacrement (Lake George) from Lake Champlain. M. de Longueuil and his son covered the right and left flanks with the Indians that they had divided into two groups. The company of volunteer from Montréal was in the vanguard, a role that it kept for the rest of the march. Scouts had reconnoitred the mountains in front of the army and had found no sign of the enemy.

On March 17, the scouts left early and the army followed on at 3:00 PM to approach Fort George at night.

At 7:00 AM on March 18, the army was at 6 km from Fort George, covered by a mountain. In the evening, the French party neared Fort William Henry, The instructions received from Vaudreuil were essentially to burn the scows and bateaux that the enemy had built under the protection of the guns of Fort George and Fort William Henry and to burn also the magazines. The garrison of Fort William Henry and Fort George, including rangers, consisted of 346 effective men. Rigaud detached MM. Poutharié, Dumas and Lemercier with French and Indians to reconnoitre the fort from a height towering above it at 2 km. Rigaud planned to climb the walls with ladders if the British were surprised. Otherwise, his little army would only blockade the fort to carry on its original instructions: the destruction of the magazines, scows and bateaux.

However, during the night of March 18 to 19, British scouts detected a French war-party near Fort William Henry. When Rigaud realized that he had lost any chance of surprise, he first withdrew and came back a few hours later to surround the fort, on which his force kept up a brisk but harmless fire of musketry.

During the night of March 19 to 20, the French were heard again on the ice, approaching as if for an assault. The British fired their guns towards the sound, driving them back again. The French then tried to set fire to two sloops and a large number of bateaux on the shore but their faggots had been made with wet wood and they burnt only a few bateaux. A party sallied from the fort to save them but it was too late.

At noon on Sunday March 20, the French filed out of the woods and marched across the ice in procession, carrying their scaling-ladders. A detachment of Indians was also sent to block the road to Fort Edward. The French army made other faggots with dryer wood. Some French then advanced, waving a red flag. A British officer with a few men went to meet them and returned bringing Le Mercier, chief of the Canadian artillery, blindfolded into the fort with a message from Rigaud. Le Mercier invited Major Eyre to give up the place peaceably, promising the most favourable terms, and threatening a general assault and massacre in case of refusal. Eyre said that he should defend himself to the last; and the envoy, again blindfolded, was led back to whence he came. Rigaud used these negotiations as a diversion while he was looking for a proper landing place to use in the coming campaign. The whole French force now advanced, as if to storm the works, and the garrison prepared to receive them. Nothing came of it but a fusillade, to which the British made no reply.

During the night of March 20 to 21, the French were able to ignite several fires. The company of volunteers burnt more than 300 bateaux and three sloops that night. The British answered with only a few cannonballs and bombs. A shed full of clothes, arms and equipment along with more than 300 cords of firewood for the garrison were also burnt. Before morning, all around Fort William Henry was in a blaze. If there had been any wind, the fort itself could have been put on fire but there was no wind that night nor the following ones.

At 10:00 AM on March 21, the fires had subsided and a thick fall of snow began which lasted all day and all the next night, till the ground and the ice were covered to a depth of one meter and more.

During the night from March 21 to 22, operations continued under very bad weather. Melted snow and a bad storm made it impossible to light any fire. The last sloop had its bowsprit touching one of the fort's bastions but it was missed. Since it was the largest sloop and almost ready to be launched, the French commander attached much importance to its destruction. He renewed his attempts in spite of the menacing thaw and of the repeated advices of the Indians.

Accordingly, in the morning of Tuesday March 22, a party of 20 French volunteers under M. Wolf from the regulars made a bold attempt to burn the remaining sloop on the stocks, with several large sheds full of supply, the hospital, the old log fort containing 17 houses, a large magazine filled with building timbers, a sawmill and several houses grouped under the fort. Two galleys (28 to 30 oars) were the final targets of the expedition. All these things almost touched the fort. They had been disposed this way by the enemy to protect them with musket fire. However, the boldness of M. de Rigaud probably impressed the commander or he finally decided to sacrifice the outer works. Enemy fire was very sporadic and the French had only five soldiers killed and one officer and an Indian wounded.

On March 23, thaw still continuing, the French army lifted camp to return to Carillon.

http://www.kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php?title=1757_-_Operations_on_Lake_George
 
Last edited:
In the below link from the Seven Years War Site, you will see the use of both Fort William Henry and Fort George. They are the same location. Fort George was the French name for Fort William Henry, similar to Fort Carillon = Fort Ticonderoga.

Besides burning the sloops, many of the ranger cabins and huts which were outside the fort proper were burned along with a number of wharehouses, other out-buildings and hundreds of bateaux (flat bottom boats, similar to a whaleboat).

One other fun element, the British were using 32-pounders to fire on the french. The British had two of those guns. Both of those guns would eventually burst from excessive firing when Montcalm successfully destroyed Fort William Henry the following summer.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top