News Update October 4, 2021 - American Civil War (1 Viewer)

Julie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
2,093
JJDESIGNS NEWS UPDATE 4[SUP]th[/SUP] OCTOBER 2021
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR
THE FIRST BATTLE OF BULL RUN, 1861.
THE 33[SUP]rd[/SUP] VIRGINIA INFANTRY REGIMENT.
COMPANY E, THE EMERALD GUARD.

The 33[SUP]rd[/SUP] Virginia Infantry Regiment was raised in the commonwealth of Virginia for service in the Confederate States Army and was part of the famed “Stonewall Brigade”.

3301-M.jpg


When the Union and Confederate armies engaged near Manassas Junction, Virginia, on July 21[SUP]st[/SUP] 1861, General Jackson and his brigade earned the nickname “Stonewall”.
Eight of the ten companies in the 33[SUP]rd[/SUP] were present.

3302-M.jpg


By late May 1861, the regiment was placed under the command of Col. Arthur C. Cummings, who was a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute who practiced law in Abington, Virginia at the far southernmost end of the valley and would twice represent Washington County, Virginia in the Virginia House of Delegates (first beginning in 1863 and again in 1871)

3303-M.jpg


At the height of the battle, it was Jackson's first brigade, and more specifically, the undersized regiment of Colonel Cummings that turned the tide of battle with a well-timed charge against an exposed artillery battery.

The successful capture of the guns is thought to be largely because, due to the lack of formality in early war uniforms, Jackson's men were dressed in blue, just like their Federal counterparts. Though the 33rd Virginia succeeded in capturing the guns, the number of men that made the charge (only about 250) were unable to maintain possession and were forced to retreat. The charge had halted the steady advance of the Union Army up to that point, and precipitated further charges by Jackson's other regiments. By day's end, the actions of the 33rd led to the complete rout of the Union Army, and played a major role in immortalizing the brigade.
The cost of immortality for Cummings' regiment was high. Of the 450 men who were present at the battle, the 33rd would suffer 43 killed and 140 wounded.

3304-M.jpg

Company E, The Emerald Guard, having participated in the battle, suffered 15 casualties including most of the company officers and NCO's. Captain Sibert was shot through both legs; Lt. Thomas C. Fitzgerald and 2d Lt. John Ireland were also wounded; in addition, Sgt. Michael Gavagan was wounded and Corp. John O. Sullivan was killed.

3305-M.jpg


Captain Marion Sibert was born January 23, 1826 near the town of New Market, Shenandoah County. When the war began, he was thirty-four years old, stood 5'11" and was described as "handsome" having a "fair complexion, light hair and hazel eyes." Wyland's History of Shenandoah County suggest that Sibert and his family were in the hotel business prior to the war.
Following John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry in 1859, Marion Sibert organized a volunteer artillery company in the New Market area known as the Tenth Legion Artillery. Despite their lack of cannon, they were called upon by the State Governor to perform guard duty at Shepherdstown on December 9, 1859 during Brown's trial.
Having returned to New Market after the trial, Sibert would not have long to wait until another opportunity presented itself. On April 18, 1861 war had erupted and Virginia, having voted in favor of secession, placed itself in danger of being invaded. When the Governor, John Letcher extended a call for certain counties to begin organizing companies for State defence in early May, Sibert once again put his business and homelife on hold and began recruiting a new company of men. This time, he targeted a distinct class of men that would form the nucleus of the company. Recruiting amongst the Irish laborers that had made their way to the Lower Valley through working on the Manassas Gap Railroad prior to the war.
As the company formed and began to drill in earnest, a contemporary newspaper account provided a glimpse to its readers of this new company.
“Through the energy and zeal of Maj. M.M. Sibert, a company of Irishmen, numbering about 60, has been raised and are in barracks at this place (New Market). These men, impelled by devotion to their adopted country, patriotically and promptly responded to the call of their State, and are now hourly preparing themselves to resist the encroachments of the mercenary hordes, who are let loose upon us by our oppressors.”
As this quote and archival records suggest, the company never reached the regulation size of 100.

3306-M.jpg


The Emerald Guard was formed in and around the town of New Market during May and early June of 1861. It was organized by a thirty-four year old Shenandoah County native named Marion Marye Sibert. and as it's name implied was formed from the Irish laborers that worked in the Valley when the War began. The company would become among the most colorful and volatile companies of the famed "Stonewall Brigade". "In their adopted sector," one historian would write, "the Sons of Erin did not mesh easily with their conservative neighbors, most of whom were of German and Scotch-Irish descent. The Celts' predilection for hard liquor and their affinity for world-class brawling at the least provocation engendered a definite air of notoriety.

Many of the Irishmen who joined the unit in May and June of 1861 were thought to be laborers who had been engaged on the construction of the Manassas Gap Railroad.

3307-M.jpg


By the middle of May, the company elected its officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs). Sibert naturally assumed the role of Captain of the Company. To compliment Sibert's militia experience, Thomas C. Fitzgerald proved to be a "most valuable acquisition" and was elected 1[SUP]st[/SUP] Lieutenant of the company. Prior to his immigration to the United States, Fitzgerald boasted prior military experience with the British Army during the Crimean War. For this reason, he was thought "well qualified for drilling the company.

3308-M.jpg


The 33[SUP]rd[/SUP] Virginia remained in the Stonewall Brigade in Thomas J. Jackson’s Second Corps until the restructuring of the Army of Northern Virginia after his death in the spring of 1863.
It was placed under Richard Ewell’s command until the spring of 1864, when it dissolved following heavy losses at the Battle of Spotsylvania Court House.

The 33[SUP]rd[/SUP] Virginia Infantry will be available spring of 2022… followed by some artillery.

Best wishes and many thanks,
john jenkins
 
Absolutely blown away! I'm glad to see some facial hair added to the regular soldiers. That's been my main complaint thus far, so many of the soldiers look like clones. Also I hope for more variety of equipment, but this is right at the beginning of the war where there was more of a uniform look amongst the different units I suppose.

Regardless I'm excited as this range continues to develop! We are getting so many unique releases with the units/regiments and personalities that have never been thought of before. Love the history!!
 
The offerings for early 2022 are shaping up nicely. I'm all in on these figures . . .
Mike
 
Yup, I am also all in.
Great to see more variety in the poses of the charging figures.
Thanks John
 
These are very nice miniatures and being Irish I can imagine how colorful they will look once painted.
But this is what I call a "marching group" and not a "holding the line group" as all but the shooting poses shown are on the move/ advancing.
Would have preferred more standing in line poses to place them next to the 4th Virginia. But these will be irresistible for sure...
 
I always was a Civil War buff, but somehow i made a "choice of field" (from the point of view of the brand) , siding with convinction with WB and their ACW figures. They were more gritty, more realistic and well researched than the offering of other brands at the times. But now with this series of regiments by JJD i'm wavering, they are really wonderful! Probably in the next future i'll choose a regiment and collect only that...i know i'm late (fortunately or unfortunately) to collect some retired pieces...
 
The announcement of the artillery sounds intriguing. While I have more than enough field pieces, always on the look for new gunners. I imagine this will be Union guns to depict the loss of Ricketts battery. Chris
 
The announcement of the artillery sounds intriguing. While I have more than enough field pieces, always on the look for new gunners. I imagine this will be Union guns to depict the loss of Ricketts battery. Chris

In past conversations with John, he has asked me numerous questions about the CSA Rockbridge Artillery 4-gun battery that was nicknamed "The Four Apostles" (Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John). He also was interested in the two-gun section from Griffin's battery that the 33rd VA captured and tried to defend against the 11th NY and the 14th Brooklyn. These were howitzers and I suggested to John that these would be unique to collectors since no other manufacturer to my knowledge has offered ACW howitzer pieces. Time will tell . . .
Mike
 
In past conversations with John, he has asked me numerous questions about the CSA Rockbridge Artillery 4-gun battery that was nicknamed "The Four Apostles" (Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John). He also was interested in the two-gun section from Griffin's battery that the 33rd VA captured and tried to defend against the 11th NY and the 14th Brooklyn. These were howitzers and I suggested to John that these would be unique to collectors since no other manufacturer to my knowledge has offered ACW howitzer pieces. Time will tell . . .
Mike

Thanks for the intel Mike. I've concentrated exclusively on Union artillery to date. However, may be the time to expand the collection. :smile2: I have a few WB brass guns that are definitely not Napoleons. I always took them to be howitzers but they may be too large for those. They may be an early "generic" version of artillery.
BTW, this is part of the dio depicting the two gun section of Griffin's battery you mention (posted earlier). Chris

Howitzer.jpg
 
Thanks for the intel Mike. I've concentrated exclusively on Union artillery to date. However, may be the time to expand the collection. :smile2: I have a few WB brass guns that are definitely not Napoleons. I always took them to be howitzers but they may be too large for those. They may be an early "generic" version of artillery.
BTW, this is part of the dio depicting the two gun section of Griffin's battery you mention (posted earlier). Chris

View attachment 280772

Nicely done Chris. I've always admired your wonderful collection of Federal artillery guns and crew figures.
Mike
 
Nicely done Chris. I've always admired your wonderful collection of Federal artillery guns and crew figures.
Mike

Many thanks Mike.

Would you say the piece is a howitzer? I've never been sure.
 
Many thanks Mike.

Would you say the piece is a howitzer? I've never been sure.

Well it's certainly not an 1857 Napoleon Gun . . . It might be WBritains early attempt at a howitzer but I am not aware that they had made one. The 1841 12-pound howitzer was the most common howitzer used by both sides. Here's a pic of one:

Mike

16335632883597607496719783583633.jpg in
 
Well it's certainly not an 1857 Napoleon Gun . . . It might be WBritains early attempt at a howitzer but I am not aware that they had made one. The 1841 12-pound howitzer was the most common howitzer used by both sides. Here's a pic of one:

Mike

View attachment 280775 in

Thanks Mike. I'd say the model is pretty close to the piece in the photo. Chris
 
Anyone have an idea of what the colors/flags will look like for this regiment? I assume one will be the emerald guard green flag that's seen in the opening credits of God's and Generals.
 
Last edited:
Anyone have an idea of what the colors/flags will look like for this regiment? I assume one will be the emerald guard green flag that's seen in the opening credits of God's and Generals.

I'm guessing the Emerald Guard flag for one and either the Virginia state flag or the CSA First National flag for the second one.
Mike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top