Hi Pat, so would it be fair to say you're an accumulator rather than a collector
Hi Oz,
I read the same article in which the collector indicated there were two types of collectors: 1.) Specialists and 2.) Accumulators. I have always detested the term "accumulator" as it implies that one will simply obtain and retain any object within the collector's genre. I like to think I am a bit more discriminating than that. Rather than thinking of myself as an "accumulator", I think of myself as a "generalist."
I know that if one specializes in a specific era, he/she can develop a more complete and more valuable collection. However, my interests are very broad and I am not overly concerned with the ultimate value of my collection. I like to have examples of all sorts of different figures in my collection, including different eras, time periods, campaigns, conflicts, etc. Further, I like to be able to show interested people different types of figures: old figures, newer figures, glossy figures, matte figures, composition figures, dimestore figures, figures of different scales, and figures manufactured by different makers. To me, the diversity of toy soldiers that have been produced is one of the most charming things about our hobby.
Having said the above, I do have favorite lines that I pursue. Because I have favorite lines, my collection is more comprehensive within these lines/ranges. While I am not a "specialist", neither am I an "accumulator." I am a generalist! So there!
Warmest personal regards,
Pat