Hi Guys,
I’ve been following the debate on the photos of our “Refugees on the Road” that I posted recently… Here’s my take on it…
Good taste is like great beauty—it’s very much in the eye or eyes of the beholder. As the old adage says “One man’s meat is another man’s poison”.
Let’s get one thing straight… from the time warfare began refugees, of one kind or another, have been a sad fact of life (and death).
What the 19th. and particularly the 20.th Centuries brought us was photography (both still and moving) where we could actually see photographs and newsreel of ordinary civilians displaced by the tide of war.
Any pictorial record of the Fall of France in 1940 or the Invasion of Russia in 1941 or the Defeat of Germany in 1945 rarely fails to include images of civilians on the road or standing by the ruins of their homes during these tumultuous events. They are as much a part of a wartime scene as a Sherman Tank or a column of German infantry foot sloggers… So, what’s with the “slightly disturbing”… “Looks like a load of Jews”… “They look too clean to be refugees”… etc… etc.
As for “doing without photographers taking photos of them”… well, would it be acceptable if it was K&C’s GI photo journalist or even a civilian photographer perhaps? Is it just because we used a couple of Germans?
As K&C (and many collectors) move even deeper into creating scenes, dioramas or dramatic displays I feel it’s important to add extra elements like accessories… buildings… destroyed vehicles and, yes, even civilians where they are appropriate. I am happy to see that most of the respondents on this particular thread seem to agree with me.
No matter what K&C does there’s always going to be a few people who don’t like it or choose to suggest sinister ulterior motives…
Oh well… c’est la vie… c’est la guerre.
Best wishes and happy collecting!
Andy C.
P.S. Talking of guns being held to heads… If you don’t like it… don’t buy it!