I think you guys are completely missing the point of my initial post, which, I had a feeling would happen given that it was as long as it was so my bad there.
I am not naive regarding the abilities of the Roman enemies, I am in fact, rather well informed, I do believe a lot of assumptions are being made behind my post which simply are not there.
Anyway, this might help illustrate my position a bit better- recall in the movie Gladiator in the initial scene- for all that movie's issues with accuracy, I feel they nailed the Germanic tribes so far as I imagine them. Now, I am assuming many collectors here have seen the flick and recall how dingy, grubby, etc the Germans appeared in that conflict?? They did in fact show them in outfits that were probably somewhat colorful at one time though the rigors of their lifestyle led to the deterioration of the fabric and muting of the colors so they were rather drab when massed in combat. The point being, if we take those barbarians to be historically accurate- would you as a collector be willing to shovel out $50 or so for a grubby Germanic tribesman covered in bearskin or fur?? That was the point of my thread- looking at the challenge, as I see it anyway, for manufacturers to release historically accurate "barbarians" at prices comparable to the cleaner, crisper looking legionaires- that's it. Over the years of collecting Roman ranges, their barbarian counterparts have been dressed out in very splendid and colorful outfits- an almost Napoleonic-era influence on what was rather a very rough and trying lifestyle for those men and women who lived it. I have always felt that the other major producers who gave us barbarians swayed more towards artistry and sacrificed historical accuracy to a degree to perhaps help sell their figures.