The Fall of Singapore (2 Viewers)

King & Country

Captain
Joined
May 23, 2005
Messages
5,003
Hi Guys,

The Fall of Singapore was the single biggest defeat in British military history...

The reason and causes of this tragedy were many and varied...and there is plenty of blame to go round from top to bottom and all points in between.

It’s true General Percival was a particularly uninspiring leader and a fair proportion of blame can be attached to him. However, Churchill, great man though he undoubtedly was, can also carry more than his fair share of blame for this debacle...

He consistently underestimated the fighting and leadership skills of the Japanese and until the actual attack thought he could outbluff them. Sending “Force Z”...HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse to Singapore was an error of the highest order. The RAF aircraft available to Malaya Command were seriously understrength...even with Australian and New Zealand Squadrons attached. And the planes themselves were often obsolete and flying deathtraps for their unfortunate crews. Certainly no match for the nimble and deadly Jap Zeros.

After the sinking of the two British Capitol ships and the abandonment of forward airfields in central and northern Malaya the British and Empire forces were consistently on the defensive or “retiring to prepared defenses” i.e. retreating. The Japs continuously outflanked them...in many cases outfought them and generally out-soldiered them in no uncertain manner.

Many of these British...Indian and Australian units were relatively fresh conscripts and some had never even fired their rifles!!! Many of their officers were too conventional in their military tactics and totally confused and disoriented by fighting in a jungle environment. Too many of the best officers and NCO’s had been “siphoned-off” to the Middle East leaving a very “mixed bag” in their place.

And as for the Colonial Government in Singapore...it was inept in the extreme and only, far too late in the day, realized the extreme danger they were in and the harsh and drastic measures that needed to be taken to put Malaya and Singapore on a proper “War Footing”.

As for the Japs themselves, they were battle-hardened veterans from the war in China with years of experience in the harsh realities of total war and how to exploit their skills and their enemy’s inexperience, over cautiousness and lack of aggression.

As I wrote earlier much of the blame for the Fall of Malaya and Singapore can be rightly laid at the feet of Churchill and his “War Cabinet”...Inadequately trained troops, no matter how many of them, cannot stand up to battle-hardened professionals. Look at the Falklands War of just twenty-five years ago for proof of that.

A serious lack of fast, well-armed modern fighter aircraft (such as the Spitfire) allowed the Japanese to gain almost total control of the air very rapidly. Allied to this a dearth of anti aircraft guns provided no protection for either the civil population or the British and Empire troops. Add into the mix no tanks of any kind only a relatively few armoured cars and the ubiquitous “bren gun carriers” and the situation darkens by the minute. Plus, after the sinking of “Repulse” and “Prince of Wales” the enemy controlled the sea lanes and the ability to operate and land their forces anywhere they chose up and down the East and West Coasts of Malaya.

It’s easy to see now how a bad situation became steadily worse and all the pieces were in place for a first-class, military disaster.

A couple of other points worth mentioning...although General Arthur Percival was not a personality or a general any of us might follow willingly into the jaws of hell...he was personally a brave man. His military record and decorations during the Great War attest to that. Which is more than can be said of one of his foremost commanders...the Australian General, Gordon Bennett. After the Fall of Singapore, Percival stayed with his men and shared many of their hardships and deprivations as “guests of the Emperor Hirohito”.

Bennett however, against orders and at the last moment, handed over command of his troops to a deputy and, to save his own skin, exited “stage left” and, eventually, escaped with a few of his immediate staff back to Australia.

As a long time expat living and working in the Far East I have always been fascinated by the Fall of Hong Kong on Christmas Day 1941 and the Fall of Malaya and Singapore in February 1942. I’ve even been privileged to meet and talk with a few men and women who experienced these disasters...and the following terrible three years as prisoners of the Japanese. It’s a humbling experience...one of these days I would like to portray in miniature just some of the dramatic moments in these two campaigns.

Until then...best wishes and...happy collecting!

Andy C.
 
Andy,

Thank you for your post.

I visited Hong Kong in the mid-80s and was also very interested in the sites(I believe I used the Hong Kong issue of “After the Battle” magazine as a reference) that are associated with the Japanese invasion. I remember visiting the old C of E church on the Hong Kong side that the Japanese turned into something quite different, the large grave yard near the Race Course, and I tried locating traces of the infamous prison camp that was located on the Kowloon side and of course the famous Peninsula Hotel where the Japanese had their headquarters.


I also have visited Kanchanaburi in Thailand, site of the infamous “Bridge of the River Kwai”. There’s a large Commonwealth War cemetery located near the site where lie buried those who died working on the bridge(there’s a monument near the cemetery to the 60,000 Allied, Burmese, Indian and Thais who died building the “Death Railway”). Most of the British who lie buried at the cemetery were captured during the Malayan, Burma campaigns, fall of Singapore and as I walked down the aisles of graves I wrote down some of the regiments from the grave markers:

The Gordon Highlanders, The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders, the Royal Norfolk Regt., Manchester Regt., The Sherwood Foresters, The East Surrey Regt., Manchester Regt., The Suffolk Regt., the Bedfordshire & Herts., the Leicestershire Regt.(“Hindoostan”), R.E.M.E., R.A., R.A.O.C., the 135th Herts Yeomanry, Royal Signals, Royal Engineers, 18th Recce. Regt.(Loyal Regt.), R.A.S.C.,148th Bedfordshire Yeomanry, Corps of Signals, Federated Malay States Volunteer Force, R.A.M.C., Singapore Royal Artillery, Malacca Volunteer Corps, Hong Kong Singapore Royal Artillery, Johore Volunteer Engineers, R.A.F., 2/15 Field Regt., R.A., H.M.S. “Repulse”, H.M.S. “Sultan”.
 
Last edited:
Andy,

Wonderful summary of Singapore. I've always found that part of the Pacific conflict fascinating and need to know more.

I hope you do something one day in miniature, at the appropriate moment.
 
Andy

What a great historic profile of the battle. My Dad severed in the Pacific during WWII with the Army Air Corps. - It would be very nice to have something from those important battles in a Range - maybe a new section of Fields of Battle??

Great info. - Thanks!

Ron
 
A couple of other points worth mentioning...although General Arthur Percival was not a personality or a general any of us might follow willingly into the jaws of hell...he was personally a brave man. His military record and decorations during the Great War attest to that. Which is more than can be said of one of his foremost commanders...the Australian General, Gordon Bennett. After the Fall of Singapore, Percival stayed with his men and shared many of their hardships and deprivations as “guests of the Emperor Hirohito”.

Bennett however, against orders and at the last moment, handed over command of his troops to a deputy and, to save his own skin, exited “stage left” and, eventually, escaped with a few of his immediate staff back to Australia.

Andy C.

When you look at Bennett's actions in WWI and his bravery awards it's clearly wrong to say that he lacked personal courage: http://www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/~rmallett/Generals/bennett.html

What he did lack was the ability to get along with General Percival and most of the British senior staff of whom he had a very low opinion, and the fall of Singapore is confirmation of Bennett's opinion.

Percival was told by his superiors not to surrender, but he did so anyway. And personally I can see why Bennett would be reluctant to carry the can for mistakes made by the British leadership, and he was right to leave Singapore with intentions to use his experience in further battles against the Japs.

It should also be noted that the Prime Minister of Australia congratulated Bennett for making his escape.

The unauthorised surrender by Percival was to protect further deaths in the civilian population and not because the allies lacked the will to fight on. For a senior Australian officer to go into capitivity in those circumstances would have been as pointless as Macarthur awaiting capture in the Phillipines.

That said, I'm surprised Bennett was given command of the 8th army considering his well known problems with the British Generals and regulars, we did have better Generals available.
 
Last edited:
Oz
Do you have much information on Dunlop Weary. He was an Aussie surgeon who was an POW during the war and who ran the sickbay on the forced raillway line that the POW's worked on. He was quite a hero and was instrumental in establishing oesophageal surgery in Australia after the war.
I found a book on him years ago.

Regards
Damian Clarke
PS I think he was more of a rugby and cricket type of chap though
 
Oz
Do you have much information on Dunlop Weary. He was an Aussie surgeon who was an POW during the war and who ran the sickbay on the forced raillway line that the POW's worked on. He was quite a hero and was instrumental in establishing oesophageal surgery in Australia after the war.
I found a book on him years ago.

Regards
Damian Clarke
PS I think he was more of a rugby and cricket type of chap though

A wugby and cwicket type was he ;) :D

Anyhow, here's a link about Dunlop. Btw, I guess he was called Weary because of the Dunlop reference to tyres (Tired/Weary) http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/dunlop/bio.htm

That link contains heaps on Aussie military history as well as photos, paintings etc, the later are in the database section.
 
Last edited:
Hi Guys,

Many thanks to OZ for giving us an alternative view of General Gordon Bennett’s behaviour at the Fall of Singapore in February 1942. Alas, as you might suspect, I take a less than charitable view of Bennett’s unilateral decision to “bug-out” from the doomed island...

Here are just a few of the many reports of Bennett’s escape...The following are taken from two recently published books (2005) on the Singapore debacle

First from Australian historian Peter Thompson’s excellent “The Battle for Singapore”.

I quote, “Percival was badly let down by Gordon Bennett, who compounded his lack of military skill by abandoning his troops — an unforgivable crime in Percival’s eyes. Bennett claimed he had escaped in order to reveal the best methods of combating the Japanese in Jungle warfare (a feat he had singularly failed to accomplish in the Battle of Johore), but (Brigadier) Ian Stewart had already been evacuated on Wavell’s orders for precisely that purpose, and Bennett’s observations were of little value. Officially he was a deserter.”
The second quote is from Colin Smith “Singapore Burning”...

“Among those who used this interlude to escape by small boat to Sumatra and then to Australia, was General Gordon Bennett who, shedding various traveling companions with all the facility of a multi-stage rocket, reached Australia in just twelve days. He was the only senior commander to leave his men at the moment of surrender. Although an official enquiry cleared him of any wrongdoing, he never held a field command again. He retired from the army in 1944.”
Another quote, again from Australian Peter Thompson’s book...

“On reaching Australia, Bennett was snubbed by the country’s top brass and never again commanded troops in battle”. One final piece relating to Bennett...“In the southern spring of 1945, Dr. Rowley Richards arrived back in Sydney in an aircraft carrier with 1,000 other Australian POW’s, many of whom had survived, the privations of the Death Railway. Gordon Bennett came down to the ship to welcome us, he says, and launched into a tirade about what a hard time they’d given him when he got back. That was the type of bloke he was. Most of the fellows just walked away from the parade”.
Of the two dozen books I’ve read on the disaster at Singapore I have never read one that exonerated Bennett’s appalling and selfish behaviour.

In OZ’s last paragraph he states that he is surprised that “Bennett was given command of the 8th Army”. I’m not only surprised...I’m amazed...whatever unfortunate unit Bennett was given, after his return, it certainly was not the 8th Army.

Finally, let me state again, the lion’s share (no pun intended) of blame for the Fall of Malaya and Singapore can be laid fairly and squarely at the feet of Churchill, the British War Cabinet, the General Staff, General Percival and the Colonial Administration of Malaya and Singapore. Many British, Indian and Australian troops fought bravely and valiantly...many others did not.

Over the years I’ve been on two “battlefield tours” of Malaya (now Malaysia) and Singapore with veterans of the campaign and other British, Australian, New Zealand, Malaysian and Singaporean army officers (I was at the time Adjutant of the Royal Hong Kong Regiment). It’s difficult terrain to fight over and difficult to defend especially against such a determined and ruthless adversary as the Japanese Army was in 1941.

I can’t excuse any of the gross errors made by our side however it really did seem that whatever decision we made was almost always the wrong one and whatever decisions the enemy made was invariably the right one! Wars and battles are often won by the side which makes the least mistakes...We certainly made plenty on Malaya and Singapore!

Best wishes,

Andy C.
 
Pardon my typo done in a hasty response to Andy's claim that Bennett lacked courage (Of course Bennett was actually given command of 8th Division, not the 8th Army).

In Andy's post(s), his main thrust is that Bennett lacked courage and bugged out to save his own skin. However, the fact remains that Bennett did not lack courage, but he certainly lacked political expediency, something that Macarthur had in bagfulls.

Bennett's attitude to regular soldiers (British & Australian), as well as British officers made him unsuitable for command, especially in a mixed allied force. The guy was a typical hot headed redhead, rather than the cool calculating personality type that is more suitable for command. And it was certainly an additional error to give Bennett command over a large number of Indian troops. Most of whom fought for the Japanese and or became prison guards over their former allies after the fall of Singapore.

Here's a biography: http://www.adb.online.anu.edu.au/biogs/A130195b.htm

We will never know how much of a contribution he made to the war effort following his escape as a result of his experience in Singapore against the Japanese, mainly because the regular army (British & Australian) wouldn't tell ;)
 
In Andy's post(s), his main thrust is that Bennett lacked courage and bugged out to save his own skin. However, the fact remains that Bennett did not lack courage, but he certainly lacked political expediency, something that Macarthur had in bagfulls.

And among other things, Macarthur was as we know a great orator-perhaps unparalleled among America's military leaders. Here are the last two paragraphs of his last great speech given at West Point on May 12, 1962:


"The shadows are lengthening for me. The twilight is here. My days of old have vanished tone and tint; they have gone glimmering through the dreams of things that were. Their memory is one of wondrous beauty, watered by tears, and coaxed and caressed by the smiles of yesterday. I listen vainly for the witching melody of faint bugles blowing reveille, of far drums beating the long roll. In my dreams I hear again the crash of guns, the rattle of musketry, the strange, mournful mutter of the battlefield.

But in the evening of my memory, always I come back to West Point. Always there echoes and re-echoes Duty - Honor - Country.

Today marks my final roll call with you, but I want you to know that when I cross the river my last conscious thoughts will be-of The Corps, and The Corps, and The Corps.

I bid you farewell."
 
Hey guys,

No need to wait for a new range to depict this theatre of conflict! I bought EA15 and IWJ030 to make a little mini-diorama of the fall of Hong Kong. With 3 kneeling/lying figures per set they face off against each other nicely. The EA are meant to represent Canadians of course. I think their uniforms/gear are pretty much accurate. Now of all the major powers in WWII I know the least about the Japanese, so the uniforms of the IWJ set may be a little off but it gets the point across.
 
Hey guys,

No need to wait for a new range to depict this theatre of conflict! I bought EA15 and IWJ030 to make a little mini-diorama of the fall of Hong Kong. With 3 kneeling/lying figures per set they face off against each other nicely. The EA are meant to represent Canadians of course. I think their uniforms/gear are pretty much accurate. Now of all the major powers in WWII I know the least about the Japanese, so the uniforms of the IWJ set may be a little off but it gets the point across.

CS, What are you saying!!! I can't believe it, your setting up a diorama which may not be totally acurate! Whats happened? lost that razor sharp edge of accuracy? or are you coming over to the dark side?
Ray :D:rolleyes:;):D
 
Nah, you guys haven't corrupted me that easily. This was a special case: I had to work with what limited Japanese sets are available. Plus only one in a thousand collectors knows anything about Jap uniforms so I'll never be called on it. :D
 
I am a big Chuchill fan. Before I came to Oz I don't think I had heard of Gallipoli although studied history all the way through school in England. Due to Gallipoli and Singapore Australians tend not to be fans of Churchill.
Incidentally when Time magazine was about to name their man of the 20th Century my bet was on Churchill (a pretty amazing life and wrote a few good books). However Einstein got it. I demand a recount.
Regards
Brett
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top