will we see any new Warpark sets soon? (1 Viewer)

Those pesky Russians are hard to find.

Seriously though, WP does such a good job telling a story but how can you complete a story w/o the Russians.

 
Why did Hangyu choose 300 as a turret number? Is this supposed to be a 503rd Tiger?

It’s not an SS Tiger. I must admit I am disappointed this is not an LSSAH Tiger to go with all the LSSAH Kharkov figures.

Hopefully War Park will change the markings prior to production.
 
A Tiger!!!! Woo Hoo
Based on my WarPark panzer IV I would expect this to be done very well. I am curious to see the price point.
Hopefully it stays close to 300.00.
 
Looks good. Any chance of a front and side view?
 
Why did Hangyu choose 300 as a turret number? Is this supposed to be a 503rd Tiger?

It’s not an SS Tiger. I must admit I am disappointed this is not an LSSAH Tiger to go with all the LSSAH Kharkov figures.

Hopefully War Park will change the markings prior to production.

I hope Hangyu sticks to this number if it is a 503rd Tiger. That way the tank can be used on Eastern and Western front dio scenes which the latter is good for me as that's where my primary European collecting and dioramas are based around.

Tom
 
I hope Hangyu sticks to this number if it is a 503rd Tiger. That way the tank can be used on Eastern and Western front dio scenes which the latter is good for me as that's where my primary European collecting and dioramas are based around.

Tom

Not sure how much you care about historical accuracy, but it's an early production Tiger with Feifels, so not really likely that it existed on the Western Front in whitewash (definitely not with the 503rd). It's really more an East Front winter Tiger.

When War Park does it in camo, it would work for Italy on the Western Front. You could also make a case for a Panzerkompanie Hummel at Arnhem, but the turret number would need to be changed.
 
I have dozens of winter SS Kharkov figures and LSSAH Schwimmwagens, Kettenkrad, and Panzer IV for Kharkov.

War Park should do an LSSAH Tiger to go with all those sets.



00f455a7500b00a53d5b5d5988dda531_zpsoftuefcm.jpg


IMG_2837_zpsswgdlry7.jpg
 
Not sure how much you care about historical accuracy, but it's an early production Tiger with Feifels, so not really likely that it existed on the Western Front in whitewash (definitely not with the 503rd). It's really more an East Front winter Tiger.

When War Park does it in camo, it would work for Italy on the Western Front. You could also make a case for a Panzerkompanie Hummel at Arnhem, but the turret number would need to be changed.

I'm interested in accuracy but also happy if a little artistic licence is used every now and again. I think to have it as primarily as an Eastern Front tank is fine but with the potential of it being on the Western Front, perhaps late war?? The Germans were getting pretty desperate for tanks no matter what type around then so perhaps some of this early mark was used on the Western Front during winter. Who knows unless you were there.

That's all I will say and what ever number and unit Hangyu produces the tank in I will buy it.

Tom
 
This one does look good but will wait for one to support the new Groß deutschland soldiers.
 
It would be fine with me if this New WP Winter Tiger Tank had no turret number at all......We could then apply our own turret numbers and unit markings as we see fit & as we so choose
 
It would be fine with me if this New WP Winter Tiger Tank had no turret number at all......We could then apply our own turret numbers and unit markings as we see fit & as we so choose

OK for those who wouldn't muck with a "F" it up mate not a fan of that,but make two versions numbered and not.
 
OK for those who wouldn't muck with a "F" it up mate not a fan of that,but make two versions numbered and not.

I agree.....Thats a good suggestion.... although as a rule it's not too hard to apply numerals to most tank turrets (actually pretty EZ unless it's zimmerit.)...That way those who need a specific number or insignia can do it themselves..... Making some with a number #300 is fine for me and I would buy a second one with no number
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top