Hi Rod, sorry but I can't say I'm a big Quentin Tarantino fan. Most of his movies I've seen have been complete ripoffs of other films, they are also very disjointed and hard to follow. And before someone accuses me of being a bit dim, I should mention that I did appreciated that "Cloverfield" portrayed a "found film" shot by amateurs.
I'm also old enough to remember "The Inglorious Bastards" that was released in the early days of Video (in Australia) which was an Italian "Dirty Dozen" ripoff, and I suspect the QT version is along the same lines. There are plenty of factual WWII battles that movie makers could base a movie on, so why have recent movies been based on fiction. For example the "Defiance" movie appears to be so removed from reality that it's almost a made up story.
The other problem I have is that like most QT films, this movie relies a lot on the depiction of violence at a very personal level. Don't get me wrong, I like good action as much as anyone, maybe even more. However, I refuse to pay money to watch movies that depict joy in sadism, such as "Silence of the Lambs" etc, and this movie seems no different imo.