A dio set featuring a shot down Red Baron in 1/30 scale would be a good start, would need some Aussies for that
A dio set featuring a shot down Red Baron in 1/30 scale would be a good start, would need some Aussies for that
Frontline already did a nice diorama set of this subject. Its probably still available if it is a subject of interest to you, Matt.
I have never seen the Frontline set in person but I believe there were some scale accuracy issues, ie. the figures were larger scale than the Tripe. Anyone know for sure? -- AlYes I know thanks Louis, it looked like 1/32 or smaller and I'm 1/30 only these days
Many years ago there used to be a problem with larger, thin resin wings on model aircraft. Warpage occurred. Twisting was also a problem. Struts might solve the twisting but that wouldn't help the thin winged monoplanes. I don't know if these problems were ever solved or not. I haven't been involved with that stuff in ages. -- AlWe are all surmising that the wings of WW1 planes have to be in polystone they could as easy be a form of resin which, would keep costs down to what they are now.
Mitch
As the new aircraft series picks up does anyone else think we should be looking to WW1 for inspiration? I would like to see a sopworth camel or Fokkers with the famous Red Baron redone. Do we think this will happen or, will we stay fixed on WWII?
Mitch
A dio set featuring a shot down Red Baron in 1/30 scale would be a good start, would need some Aussies for that
For those of you who haven't seen the Frontline Red baron, here are images from thier site:
John
I have never seen the Frontline set in person but I believe there were some scale accuracy issues, ie. the figures were larger scale than the Tripe. Anyone know for sure? -- Al
I'd love to see 1/30 polystone WW1 aircraft but I don't know that the inherent problems in WW1 planes can be overcome at a decent price point. Construction problems would include weight (multiple wings); how to support the wings (metal struts?); the bracing wires are extremely complicated on most WW1 planes and finding a practical solution to the wires is going to be tough. It will be a challenge to produce affordable WW1 aircraft. -- Al
Overall, I think that metal struts would have to be used on polystone wings. I wasn't so much worried about the bracing wire material as I was about the expense to apply them. The Wooden KC Biplanes and the Heco models are top grade and a bit out of the affordable ($200 ?) range we are discussing and that the cost of the wiring would have been absorbed within their higher price. The wing weight is a concern as the much thinner biplane wings are going to be delicate. I do not know if combining wooden wings with polystone fuselages is practical construction wise or cost wise. Problems to be solved. -- AlOn the wood biplanes aircraft K&C has produced, including the recent Fairey Swordfish and Gloster Gladiator, wood struts were used, and string was used to replicate the bracing wires. On Heco Tinplate Models, metal struts are used and metal wires are used to replicate the bracing wires. Either of these solutions would work fine with a polystone biplane. I would be more concerned about the weight and fragility of the wings then the struts and bracing wires.