ACW Federal Light Artillery (1 Viewer)

mestell

Lieutenant Colonel
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
7,992
Yesterday I received the newly released WB ACW #31291 Federal Light Artillery Limber w/Two Man Crew along with #31279 Federal Artilleryman Yelling for Another Round and #31283 Federal Artilleryman Standing w/Hand on Belt. It's been a long time in the making and release but it was well worth the wait. I've never been disappointed in any WB ACW sets and they have always been worth waiting on. Using the new sets and figures from existing sets I had already collected, I was able to put together the below pictured diorama featuring the new limber and a 3" ordnance rifle with a full 8-man crew along with a gun section officer and sergeant (a gun section consisted of two guns commanded by a Lt. and a Sgt.) There were three gun sections in a 6-gun battery. A battery was usually commanded by a captain.

A detachment was one gun and its crew. The crew consisted of a Gunner and seven "numbered positions". The cannoneers were: #1, who swabbed the bore and rammed the load; #2, inserted the charge and projectile into the muzzle; #3, tended the gun vent; #4 primed and fired the piece at the command of the sergeant; #5, carried the round in a leather bag to #2; #6 had charge of the limber; and #7 carried the round to #5.

When in action, the gun would be driven into position, the gun would be removed from the limber by the cannoneers and brought to bear on the target. If need be, the #1 man would use the 'worm' to remove any material from the bore and swab it with a damp sponge rammer. The gunner would decide the range, and yell that information to #6 at the limber, along with the type of round required. Then the gunner would mount the sight, and begin to aim the gun. #6 would prepare the round, using the Firing Table in the Limber Box to choose fuse time. #7 would carry the round to the #5 man who delivered it to the #2 man standing by the muzzle of the gun. He would position it in the muzzle of the gun for the #1 man to ram down the bore. All this time, the #3 man has covered the vent to keep air from any embers that may be present. When the round is seated, the #3 man would use a pick (the priming wire) to pierce the powder bag. #1 and 2 at the wheels of the gun and #3 at the trail spike would assist the gunner by moving the gun left or right. After the gunner is satisfied with his job, he removes the rear sight and steps back from the gun. The #4 man inserts a primer into the vent, attached to the lanyard, and steps back, #3 helping keeping the lanyard taut. At this time, with the cannoneers safely away from the gun, it is ready to fire. Upon command of the Chief of the piece, #4 pulls the lanyard firing the cannon. The cannon would recoil as much as 8 feet from its original position and #1,2 and 3 would move it back into battery (correct position), and the cycle starts again.

ACW Artillery Crew Positions.gif

Enjoy, :smile2: Mike

DSC_0002 (1024x521).jpg

DSC_0003 (1024x712).jpg

DSC_0004 (1024x587).jpg
 
This has always puzzeled me....why would the ammo cassion have the poles facing the gun and not the other way around....having the pole facing the gun meant that #6/#7 had to pick up the charge from the cassion " box " on the limber, and go around the limber then the full extent of the pole to then run the distance between where the cassion is and the tail of the gun so as to get the round to #5. Were the cassion turned around and given that the access to the rounds and powder were done via the back of the cassion that would be a quicker access.......{sm3}{sm3}{sm3}{sm3}
Not to mention that in the event of a new for a quick withdraw the pairs of horses would access the cassion faster and easier as the limber would be pointing the genral retreat direction.....
Any reason for it never having been that way?
Cheers
Luiz
 
This has always puzzeled me....why would the ammo cassion have the poles facing the gun and not the other way around....having the pole facing the gun meant that #6/#7 had to pick up the charge from the cassion " box " on the limber, and go around the limber then the full extent of the pole to then run the distance between where the cassion is and the tail of the gun so as to get the round to #5. Were the cassion turned around and given that the access to the rounds and powder were done via the back of the cassion that would be a quicker access.......{sm3}{sm3}{sm3}{sm3}
Not to mention that in the event of a new for a quick withdraw the pairs of horses would access the cassion faster and easier as the limber would be pointing the genral retreat direction.....
Any reason for it never having been that way?
Cheers
Luiz

Horses walk backward with difficulty especially when hitched to a vehicle. It was much easier and faster to move the limber forward and then turn to limber up rather than to try and back up to the gun to limber. So the limbers would be placed pointing forwards. The limber and team would be pulled up just ahead of the gun. The gun crew would then swing the cannon's carriage around to attach the gun trail to the limber. Depending on the ground terrain, guns were usually spaced 12-14 yards apart and the limbers were placed approximately 25 feet or more behind the gun.
:smile2: Mike
 
Last edited:
I rec'd my light artillery limber set yesterday. I bought these for the two crew figs as the limber does nothing for me without battery horses (note to Ken). That said, WB are still the best in the business for ACW and AZW conflicts IMO. FL did some artillery figs yrs ago, but WB is the only company still adding to the line. Attaching some pics of what the sculpts looked like in 2003 (left) and the recent release (right). What was carried in the pouch/valise? Chris

IMG_1234.JPG
IMG_1236.JPG
 
The pouch is for safely carrying the ammunition up to the gun. I'm not sure if Crewmen 6 & 7 carried one, or just #5.
 
Essentially #5 had the leather bag and carried the powder bag in it to #2 for safety.
:smile2: Mike
 
I rec'd my light artillery limber set yesterday. I bought these for the two crew figs as the limber does nothing for me without battery horses (note to Ken). That said, WB are still the best in the business for ACW and AZW conflicts IMO. FL did some artillery figs yrs ago, but WB is the only company still adding to the line. Attaching some pics of what the sculpts looked like in 2003 (left) and the recent release (right). What was carried in the pouch/valise? Chris

View attachment 242376
View attachment 242377

What a difference 15-16 years make . . .. ..
:smile2: Mike
 
Would love to see more close-ups of the new releases like those comparison pictures.
 
Thanks Mike!
Guess I was always puzzeled why in ACW the cassions were placed that way.
Cheers
Luiz

Horses walk backward with difficulty especially when hitched to a vehicle. It was much easier and faster to move the limber forward and then turn to limber up rather than to try and back up to the gun to limber. So the limbers would be placed pointing forwards. The limber and team would be pulled up just ahead of the gun. The gun crew would then swing the cannon's carriage around to attach the gun trail to the limber. Depending on the ground terrain, guns were usually spaced 12-14 yards apart and the limbers were placed approximately 25 feet or more behind the gun.
:smile2: Mike
 
Essentially #5 had the leather bag and carried the powder bag in it to #2 for safety.
:smile2: Mike

If I had looked closer at your photo, Mike, I would have noticed you had the entire crew in the correct positions (not surprisingly).
 
In the spirit of the new releases from Britains I wanted to share two pictures of some recent acquisitions of mine. They are two of the federal dismounted cavalry and Robert E Lee. I know they are several years old, but I still think they look great and do a good job at being historically accurate. It has been some time since I have added anything to my collection since the unfortunate paint flaking incident with my First Legion collection (which I found to be just extremely delicate figures with thin painting). It's nice to have these Britains figures arrive and I look forward to getting back into collecting. After all it was Britains that brought me into the hobby of toy soldiers. Enjoy!
federal.jpg
Lee.jpg
 
Lo . . . . I have all three of these figures and I like them very much also . . . . .
:smile2: Mike
 
In the spirit of the new releases from Britains I wanted to share two pictures of some recent acquisitions of mine. They are two of the federal dismounted cavalry and Robert E Lee. I know they are several years old, but I still think they look great and do a good job at being historically accurate. It has been some time since I have added anything to my collection since the unfortunate paint flaking incident with my First Legion collection (which I found to be just extremely delicate figures with thin painting). It's nice to have these Britains figures arrive and I look forward to getting back into collecting. After all it was Britains that brought me into the hobby of toy soldiers. Enjoy!
View attachment 242654
View attachment 242655

That's a big get. mate! Keep going!:)

Cheers

Enrico
 
I missed this thread Mike...
nice acquisition on your Federal Light Artillery Limber...
I know it's been a while...
but like you said...
it looks like it was worth the wait!
 
I missed this thread Mike...
nice acquisition on your Federal Light Artillery Limber...
I know it's been a while...
but like you said...
it looks like it was worth the wait!

Thanks Mike . . . . I have found over the years that it is always worth the wait on most everything produced by W. Britains.

:smile2: Mike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top