Harrytheheid
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 4,672
This is the last post i,ll make on this ,but to imply a massacre is
complete bollucks .The New Zealand division was surounded outnumbered and escaping in the middle of the night they didnt hang around to round to
round up wounded and slaughter them vis a vis a massacre.
I dont mind informed debate ,but their is no evedince to support the
claims of a massacre and I have spoken to vets and read numerous
accounts of this action.
Vandilay,
No-one to my knowledge is implying negatives or trashing the contribution of the Kiwis (or any other Allied nation) towards the war effort. If wounded soldiers were caught up in the action, then harsh as it sounds, tough titty for them. I would suggest that massacres of wounded enemies did take place, but such occurences involving Allied troops was much less frequent than incidents involving Axis forces. Examples = Massacres of British troops during the retreat to Dunkirk. Massacres of Canadians during Normandy. Massacres of Americans during B of the B.
I don't condone massacres of Axis troops in any way, but anyone who trashes Allied actions during WW2 (Bombing of Germany, A-Bombing of Japan, etc) is looking through rose-tinted specs - with the benefit of hindsight. And of course, applying present day values to what at the time was a DESPERATE struggle against a new type of Barbarity - Nazism.