April Plane Release (2 Viewers)

Gunn Miniatures

Command Sergeant Major
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
2,700
That's all for this month, all models available will soon be on our website www.tomgunn.co.uk or can be reserved by emailing us at welcome@tomgunn.co.uk.
For those of you who missed out on the Dornier 17's we have a spare Desert variant for sale on the website plus one of our first WW1 cream Rumplers which are both worth looking at.
Please note we still offer a 3 to 6 month deferred payment scheme on all our models, drop us a line if you wish to take advantage of this. Our figures newsletter will be middle of the month, thank you all once again for your tremendous support.

Regards
The Gunn Team
 
WOW 118 and WOW 119 The Savoia-Marchetti SM.82 was a WW2 Italian bomber and transport aircraft. It was a cantilever, mid-wing monoplane trimotor with a retractable tailwheel undercarriage. There were 875 (plus one prototype) built in total, the first entering service in 1940. Although able to operate as a bomber with a maximum bombload of up to 8,818 lb (4000kg), the SM.82 saw very limited use in this role. The SM.82 was one of the largest number of a foreign built aircraft to be used by the Luftwaffe, in fact the Luftwaffe operated several hundred in a transport role. Post-war about 30 SM.82s continued in service with the Aeronautica Militare Italiana, many remaining in service until the early 1960’s.
The SM.82 was developed from the earlier SM.75 Marsupiale civil transport as a heavy bomber and military transport. Although having the same configuration of the SM.75, the SM.82 was larger. The aircraft was quickly developed and the prototype first flew in 1939. Although underpowered and slow, it was capable of carrying heavy loads, including the L3 light tank and a complete disassembled CR.42 fighter. It had both cargo and troop transport capability, with room up to 40 men and their equipment.
Deliveries to the Regia Aeronautica began in 1940. However, production rates were slow, with only 100 aircraft delivered in 1940, and another 100 in 1941, there were never enough of these aircraft in service due to the slow production and the exigencies of operating on two military fronts. By 1942 production doubled to 200 a year, while in 1944 almost 300 were produced, by which time the factory was under the control of the German armed forces. Operated by the Italian Air Force with some success the SM.82 was a reliable workhorse but there were never enough in operation to make a difference to the outcome of the war.
Between 1942 and Spring 1943, the Luftwaffe’s FliegerTransportGruppe "Savoia" operated 100 Savoia Marchettis. After September 1943, SIAI kept on producing SM.82 for the Luftwaffe, delivering another 299 planes. Other Marsupiali were also captured after the 8 September armistice and pressed into Luftwaffe service. These aircraft had better capabilities as transports than the Junkers JU52, the standard transport aircraft of the Luftwaffe, which however was a much more robust design, compared to the SM.82, being an all metal construction. Under German insignia, the Savoia Marchetti were operated mostly by 6th Luftflotte*and ReichLuftflotte on the Eastern front and in Northern Germany up to the end of war.
We have 2 variants of the SM.82 on offer; WOW118 in German markings and the second WOW119 in a very striking Italian camouflage colour scheme. Both are limited to 5 in number and are priced at $1400 plus $250 postage to places like the USA and Australia. For Europe and UK please contact us for a postage quote, hopefully you will be cheaper as you are closer! This is a 1/32 scale aircraft with dimensions of 93cm/37" wingspan by 69cm/27" fuselage length and if you are looking for a comparison is roughly the same size as B-17 Flying Fortress.

SM 82 9.jpg

SM 82 1.jpg

SM 82 4.jpg

SM 82 7.jpg

SM 82 2.jpg
 
WOW200: The Gotha Go 242 was a glider employed by the German forces during WW2. Designed by Albert Kalkert in response to a Luftwaffe requirement for a heavy transport glider and intended to replace the DFS 230 assault glider then in service. The requirement was for a glider capable of carrying 20 fully laden troops or the equivalent cargo. The aircraft was a high-wing monoplane with a simple square-section fuselage ending in clamshell type doors used to load cargo. The empennage was mounted on twin booms linked by a tail-plane. The fuselage was formed of steel tubing covered with doped fabric. The flight characteristics of the design were better than those of the DFS 230. Cargo versions of the glider featured a hinged rear fuselage loading ramp that could accommodate a small vehicle such as a Kubelwagen or loads of similar size and weight. Two prototypes flew in 1941and the type quickly entered production. A total of 1,528 were built, 133 of which were converted to the Go 244, with engines fitted to the forward extensions of the tail booms. The Go 242 was tested with various rockets for overloaded take offs and these were found to be a successful addition and often a necessary requirement under field conditions.
Dimensions of the Gotha 242 were an 80ft wing span and a 50ft length, which was similar size-wise to the Allied Waco glider. This may surprise some readers but these dimensions also make the Gotha larger than our recently released Junkers 88, should give you an idea of the size! Like the Waco the Gotha had a large glazed cockpit area which gave the pilots an excellent field of view when coming into land. Unlike the Allied gliders, the Gotha could be armed with up to 4 machine guns firing from its side windows!
Our 1/32 scale hand carved all Mahogany version has a wingspan of 76cm/30" and a length of 50cm/19.5" and is limited to 10 in number worldwide, at present we only have 2 in stock with the rest due to follow later this year. Comes with a price tag of $1050 plus $150 postage to destinations like the USA and Australia. Elsewhere please drop us an email for a quote as hopefully shipping will be cheaper!

Gotha 242 5.jpg

Gotha 242 2.jpg

Gotha 242 3.jpg

Gotha 242 10.jpg

Gotha 242 1.jpg
 
The Fokker D.VII was a German World War I fighter aircraft designed by Reinhold Platz of the Fokker-Flugzeuwerke. Germany produced around 3,300 D.VII aircraft in the second half of 1918. In service with the Luftstreitkfafte, the D.VII quickly proved itself to be a formidable aircraft. The Armistice ending the war specifically required Germany to surrender all D.VIIs to the Allies. Surviving aircraft saw much service with many countries in the years after World War I.
The D.VII entered squadron service with Jasta 10 in early May 1918. When the Fokker D.VII appeared on the Western Front in April 1918, Allied pilots at first underestimated the new fighter because of its squarish, ungainly appearance but quickly revised their view. The type quickly proved to have many important advantages over the Albatros and Pfalz scouts. Unlike the Albatros scouts, the D.VII could dive without any fear of structural failure. The D.VII was also noted for its high manoeuvrability and ability to climb at high angles of attack, its remarkably docile stall and reluctance to spin. It could literally "hang on its prop" without stalling for brief periods of time, spraying enemy aircraft from below with machine gun fire. These handling characteristics contrasted with contemporary scouts such as the Camel and SPAD, which stalled sharply and spun vigorously.
Several aircraft suffered rib failures and fabric shedding on the upper wing. Heat from the engine sometimes ignited phosphorus ammunition until cooling vents were installed in the engine cowling and fuel tanks sometimes broke at the seams. Aircraft built by the Fokker factory at Schwerin were noted for their lower standard of workmanship and materials. Despite faults, the D.VII proved to be a remarkably successful design, leading to the familiar aphorism that it could turn a mediocre pilot into a good one and a good pilot into an ace.
Manfred Von Richthofen died days before the D.VII began to reach the Jagdstaffeln and never flew the type in combat. Other notable pilots, including Erich Löwenhardt and Hermann Göring, who quickly racked up victories and generally lauded the design. Aircraft availability was limited at first but by July there were 407 in service. Larger numbers became available by August, when D.VIIs achieved 565 victories. The D.VII eventually equipped 46 Jagdstaffeln. When the war ended in November, some
775 D.VII aircraft were still in service.

Our first lozenge pattern 1/30 scale model WOW180 was one flown by Paul Strahle an Ace with 15 or so victories to his name, the model comes with a free figure of GW060 from our current collection subject to availability and the aircraft is limited to 8 in number worldwide. Our thanks to Uwe Philippi in Germany who gave us some valuable assistance with this model.

Our second 1/30 scale variant WOW191 was one of the most eye catching Fokker's of WW1 decorated with the seven Swabians from the Grimm Brothers fairy tale. This aircraft was flown by Gefreiter (Private!) Wilhelm Scheutzel and the fascinating story of the Seven Swabians is below:
Once upon a time there were Seven Swabians who travelled through the world.
To be safe from danger they carried one long spear with them. One day in July they walk through a meadow just by nightfall and notice a hornet buzzing by. Unaware what they just heard the men start to panic, thinking it was a war drum. One of them tries to flee, jumps over a fence and then walks right on the teeth of a rake, whereupon the handle hits him in the face. He quickly begs for mercy and tells the invisible attacker that he'll surrender, whereupon his six friends do the same. Later, when they finally understand they were fooled they decide to keep this embarrassing anecdote a secret. To prevent the story from getting out they swear to not say anything about it until one of them should accidentally open his mouth.
Later they encounter a hare sleeping in the sun. They take the animal for a monster and decide to attack it. After bracing themselves with all the courage they can get they strike out and the hare runs away, whereupon they realize they've once again been fooled.
The septet travels onward until they reach the river Moselle. Unaware how to cross it they ask a man on the opposite side of the river for help. Due to the distance and their language the man doesn't understand what they were saying and he asked them in the dialect of Trier: "Wat, Wat?" This causes the men to think that they have to wade through the water. As the first Swabian gets into the river he starts to sink into the mud. His hat is blown away to the opposite shore, next to a frog who croaks noises that sound like "wat, wat, wat". The six surviving Swabians think it's their friend telling them to wade across; they rush in the water and all drown!
This hand carved Mahogany model comes with a free GW70B figure as per the photos subject to availability, and the aircraft itself is limited to 8 in number worldwide. Both Fokker's are priced at the normal price of $499 plus $100 postage, for those of you in Europe or UK please email us (welcome@tomgunn.co.uk) for an individual postage quote.

Fokker VII 'Paul Strahle' 1.jpg

Fokker VII 'Paul Strahle' 2.jpg

Fokker VII 'Paul Strahle 4.jpg

Fokker VII 'Paul Strahle' 5.jpg

Fokker VII 'Paul Strahle' 7.jpg
 
Welcome to our April 2018 newsletter which features 3 different types of aircraft, 2 previously unreleased and unique to the collecting world. All our hand carved Mahogany aircraft take around 60 hours to manufacture and each comes with a detailed interior and display stand. We do not make many of each, if you are interested please let us know your interest at earliest convenience.
 

love the plane and colors but why all the whitish grey lines all over the plane. I have never seen
wwii planes with lines all over them in the real world but it seems to be the rage in model making.
I have been to numerous museums around the world and you can't find them. I know manufacturers
around trying to show where sheets of metal meet but they don't look like that in the real world. It just takes away from a beautiful plane. Whether ittgunn or kc its a shame which i swhy i keep mine money in my wallet.
Does anybody else feel the same way
 
love the plane and colors but why all the whitish grey lines all over the plane. I have never seen
wwii planes with lines all over them in the real world but it seems to be the rage in model making.
I have been to numerous museums around the world and you can't find them. I know manufacturers
around trying to show where sheets of metal meet but they don't look like that in the real world. It just takes away from a beautiful plane. Whether ittgunn or kc its a shame which i swhy i keep mine money in my wallet.
Does anybody else feel the same way

I hate panel lines, main reason I don't buy any models with them. As you said, they are not noticeable on full sized aircraft, then why use them on small models.
 
On plastic scale models panel lines if done right look very realistic but on hand carved wooden planes they look so faked and toy liked.
 
As you said, they are not noticeable on full sized aircraft, then why use them on small models.

I'd just note that's a lot of surface area that would have gone unmarked. In the absence of the lines, you'd be left with a pretty stark "canvas." IMO, the lines look better on some models than others. I'm no expert on the nuances of the craft as regard wooden-models, but this may be attributable to the base color on top of which the lines are applied. Gunn has produced an occasional dud among it's wooden offerings, but most of them are pretty nice models. They certainly seem to hold up to scrutiny when compared to KC's offerings.

-Moe
 
On plastic scale models panel lines if done right look very realistic but on hand carved wooden planes they look so faked and toy liked.
I agree, moulded panel lines on plastic kit models can add detail...provided they are subtle and not too deep or obvious.

I'd just note that's a lot of surface area that would have gone unmarked. In the absence of the lines, you'd be left with a pretty stark "canvas." IMO, the lines look better on some models than others. I'm no expert on the nuances of the craft as regard wooden-models, but this may be attributable to the base color on top of which the lines are applied. Gunn has produced an occasional dud among it's wooden offerings, but most of them are pretty nice models. They certainly seem to hold up to scrutiny when compared to KC's offerings.

-Moe

TGM and KC overdo panel lines IMO..but opinions will obviously vary with each collector. Personally I'd prefer their models didn't include painted on panel lines as they rarely look realistic. However I agree the lines looks better on some of their models than others and that may have to do with colours used. I prefer lines done in a slightly darker color than the overall base colour or a faint black on camo schemes. However I would prefer No panel lines combined with realistic Weathering.
 
I'd just note that's a lot of surface area that would have gone unmarked. In the absence of the lines, you'd be left with a pretty stark "canvas." IMO, the lines look better on some models than others. I'm no expert on the nuances of the craft as regard wooden-models, but this may be attributable to the base color on top of which the lines are applied. Gunn has produced an occasional dud among it's wooden offerings, but most of them are pretty nice models. They certainly seem to hold up to scrutiny when compared to KC's offerings.

-Moe
As an owner of the huge Sunderland, the problems I have are space and finding a suitable display method. With a wingspan of around 4 feet, it is an awe inspiring beast. The Handley Page is soon to appear to challenge display further. But not noticing panel lines, I can only say that having the thing in front of you, such small things don't stand out :). It's a great problem to have.
 
The faux panel lines look pretty good on this one:

002.jpg



-Moe
 
For comparison, the Corgi 1/72 with real panel lines:

aa27502-1.png






Done properly, the effect looks similar enough.

-Moe
 
The faux panel lines look pretty good on this one:

002.jpg



-Moe
Hi Moe,
Yes, we liked them so much that Jack and I got one each - Nuts and Mabel need a really big base to fit in the same dio but both are from Aussie squadrons.
 
On plastic scale models panel lines if done right look very realistic but on hand carved wooden planes they look so faked and toy liked.

Not sure if you have seen this one in the flesh? I have and it’s an outstanding model - perhaps looking at photographs and drawing conclusions simply don’t do justice to these types of product.

I think it’s fair to say that Gunn produce the best quality and most diverse aircraft on the market. Due to space, financial and display constraints I only have a handful, but very grateful indeed that I have those that I do.
 
For comparison, the Corgi 1/72 with real panel lines:

aa27502-1.png


Done properly, the effect looks similar enough.


I have this model as well. As Moe stated, the panel lines are actually carved/indentations and blend well. The TGM model lines are painted with a different color and appear too noticeable, at least in the pictures. Suggest using more muted colors if painting. BTW, I never noticed pronounced panel lines like those on TGM models on any aircraft I flew, nor do I notice them now on civilian aircraft. Chris
 
Not sure if you have seen this one in the flesh? I have and it’s an outstanding model - perhaps looking at photographs and drawing conclusions simply don’t do justice to these types of product.

I think it’s fair to say that Gunn produce the best quality and most diverse aircraft on the market. Due to space, financial and display constraints I only have a handful, but very grateful indeed that I have those that I do.

I'm sure it's a nice model to you. I have not seen it in the flesh but the pictures show how they look to me very clearly and I still think those panel lines don't look good at all especially when they are done in that bright/light color. Sorry real planes don't look anything like that.
 
I'm sure it's a nice model to you. I have not seen it in the flesh but the pictures show how they look to me very clearly and I still think those panel lines don't look good at all especially when they are done in that bright/light color. Sorry real planes don't look anything like that.

Think your right going by this photo of a “Real “one {eek3}C7723415-096B-4EB0-B3A9-989D29B216E2.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top