Mitch
Major General
- Joined
- May 1, 2010
- Messages
- 13,519
Well, I saw it posted by some that when the figures come out from the new Arnhem, MG, P series they will be there taking pictures of them and evaluating them with the older versions.
What a waste of time that will be other than to try and prove to themselves in some way that the price increase is justified because they look better than the 2007/8 releases from the series.
I don't think anyone and certainly not I have said they are not good figures so, the vain point that will be rolled out when they are released by these persons will be as wasteful as any old to new set comparison. The paint style has changed over the years so, instead of trying to vainly show the product is better in this way or that way to previous releases do it properly.
It only will be useful to show how they mix if, indeed they do, with the previous releases with the rather changed interpretation of the Denison jackets and darker tones so, that will be interesting only.
This will mean taking pictures of the more recent figures which we have seen from K&C which have similar facial tones and, paint style in order to address what has (if anything) changed, improved to warrant the price increase and, the P name.
Its going to be a little harder to do this with the Indians but, that can be left to those with an interest and knowledge in that era.
Well, that's it so, we await the rather expected ''their much better than the old so, there definitely worth it'' but, we are aware of the caveats of such simplistic interpretations and the reasoning behind it.
No offence to anyone but, this is an important issue so, we need to address it properly. The question is are they actually better than the current well painted standard releases from K&C at £41/44 and thus worth£55/76 not, are they better than the old Arnhem figures.
Mitch
What a waste of time that will be other than to try and prove to themselves in some way that the price increase is justified because they look better than the 2007/8 releases from the series.
I don't think anyone and certainly not I have said they are not good figures so, the vain point that will be rolled out when they are released by these persons will be as wasteful as any old to new set comparison. The paint style has changed over the years so, instead of trying to vainly show the product is better in this way or that way to previous releases do it properly.
It only will be useful to show how they mix if, indeed they do, with the previous releases with the rather changed interpretation of the Denison jackets and darker tones so, that will be interesting only.
This will mean taking pictures of the more recent figures which we have seen from K&C which have similar facial tones and, paint style in order to address what has (if anything) changed, improved to warrant the price increase and, the P name.
Its going to be a little harder to do this with the Indians but, that can be left to those with an interest and knowledge in that era.
Well, that's it so, we await the rather expected ''their much better than the old so, there definitely worth it'' but, we are aware of the caveats of such simplistic interpretations and the reasoning behind it.
No offence to anyone but, this is an important issue so, we need to address it properly. The question is are they actually better than the current well painted standard releases from K&C at £41/44 and thus worth£55/76 not, are they better than the old Arnhem figures.
Mitch