Interesting that when I went to bed after the game, Bumgarner had been awarded the win, to give him a 3-0 record for the Series. Now, I see this AM, this has been changed to Affeldt getting the win and Bumgarner getting a save instead of the win. I thought last night that the rules, as I understood them, would have scored the game that way and I was surprised that Bumgarner was awarded the win. I just chalked it up to my being ignorant of some obscure scoring rule in relation to wins/saves. I don't know why the reversal any more than I know why the original scoring decision. Either way, win or save, it was a superlative job by Bumgarner and a more than well-deserved MVP. -- Al
Brad, that is my understanding of the 'Save' rule, also. My confusion is that Bumgarner was initially awarded the 'W' for the game and that's where it stood when I turned in. This AM I found the initial ruling reversed so that Affeldt got the W and Bumgarner got the 'Save', (which is how I thought it should have been in the first place). -- AlIf at any time during a pitcher's innings, the go-ahead run is on deck, it becomes a save situation. I think that was the case, from the time he came in, because the score was 3-2 at that point, wasn't it?
It was indeed a great series, though I was rooting for the Royals. I was glad it went to seven games, and Game Seven was hard-fought, from the first at-bat.
Now we start the hot-stove league, and look forward to the middle of February, when pitchers and catchers report.
I guess the first big news will be the official announcement that Joe Maddon will take over as the Cubs' new manager, if it hasn't been announced already this morning.
ESPN just posted the reason for the scoring change. Under rule 10.17 the only ways for a pitcher to not get the win if he is pitching when the winning run scores is if he is the starter and doesn't go 5 innings or if he is a reliever that is ineffective in a short stint. Affeldt was very effective in his 2.1 innings and therefore earned the win. The definition of 'a short stint' wasn't given but probably falls into the 1 or 2 out range type of thing, which Affeldt's stint certainly exceeded. The official scorers erred by initially awarding the win to Bumgarner and after contacting the Elias Sports Bureau, they changed the ruling to the correct one. -- AlBrad, that is my understanding of the 'Save' rule, also. My confusion is that Bumgarner was initially awarded the 'W' for the game and that's where it stood when I turned in. This AM I found the initial ruling reversed so that Affeldt got the W and Bumgarner got the 'Save', (which is how I thought it should have been in the first place). -- Al
ESPN just posted the reason for the scoring change. Under rule 10.17 the only ways for a pitcher to not get the win if he is pitching when the winning run scores is if he is the starter and doesn't go 5 innings or if he is a reliever that is ineffective in a short stint. Affeldt was very effective in his 2.1 innings and therefore earned the win. The definition of 'a short stint' wasn't given but probably falls into the 1 or 2 out range type of thing, which Affeldt's stint certainly exceeded. The official scorers erred by initially awarding the win to Bumgarner and after contacting the Elias Sports Bureau, they changed the ruling to the correct one. -- Al
Jason, I think it unfortunate but true that baseball takes a backseat to NFL football from football's first regular-season game, maybe even pre-season. I think you are also correct about the 24 hour newscycle. I think the interest ESPN and gang have in LaBron is more of a bandwagon thing as I don't believe the NBA is anywhere near as popular as it was years ago, and certainly not as popular as either football or baseball, at least in my case/opinion. It does seem baseball gets pushed off the front page very quickly. -- AlSpeaking of ESPN, I watched this morning's Sportscenter and they showed a few highlights from the World Series and had a short story about it. A few hours later, I was watching Sportscenter again and there was no mention of the World Series? It was all about LeBron, FSU and the Broncos/Patriots game? Is it just me or does baseball take a back seat to LeBron and football even where the World Series is concerned? After the Superbowl we get weeks of postgame coverage. I am not complaining because the Giants won, I am just curious if baseball has lost its popularity or is all of this part of the 24 hour news cycle?
Speaking of ESPN, I watched this morning's Sportscenter and they showed a few highlights from the World Series and had a short story about it. A few hours later, I was watching Sportscenter again and there was no mention of the World Series? It was all about LeBron, FSU and the Broncos/Patriots game? Is it just me or does baseball take a back seat to LeBron and football even where the World Series is concerned? After the Superbowl we get weeks of postgame coverage. I am not complaining because the Giants won, I am just curious if baseball has lost its popularity or is all of this part of the 24 hour news cycle?
Watched the Giants victory parade today, nice to see all that black and orange on Halloween, how appropriate, about a million fans turned out in a monsoon, they sure love their Giants, as do I.