Many congratulations Chris...Now, that is impressive!
I think quite a few of our Aussie mates would even have such a comprehensive set up...Really terrific...Now where are you hiding the Turkish artillery..?
All the best and happy collecting, Andy.
Andy, Chris,
As one of Andy's Aussie Mates, I will have to say a few words:
Great display, water effects super!, lovely beach.
Suggestions: Firstly, the boats would have been "cast off" from the Launch 100m off shore and rowed from there. Reasons: Launches didn't want to go in too close in case they ran aground, and the sooner they cast off the boats the sooner they could go back to pick up the next lot of boats.
Secondly, "Best Practice" when towing boats is to do so "line ahead" (ie: a single line) All of the evidence I have seen indicates that best practice was usually followed, occasionally, in 2 lines but never three, that would be an accident waiting to happen
Thirdly, That Launch is not an RN Launch. Yes, I know, no one makes one, yet
The Turks: It is now a settled question that there were not more than 90 Turks (ie a "Company") in ANZAC Cove at dawn on 25 April 1915. They were not "dug in" ,so no sandbags and barbed wire. Certainly no artillery!
The Turks knew that there was to be an "invasion", somewhere on the peninsular, but they didn't know where. What they identified as "likely spots" were well defended. "ANZAC Cove" was not a "likely spot", indeed the Australians were not supposed to land there !! That they did land there was a military Stuff up of monumental proportions.
There were 900 casualities on the beach that day. This shows what well trained, tough "steady" troops can do when occupying the high ground and presented with a mass of "easy targets"
Now, by the next day, ie 26 April that had changed, there were hundreds of Turks, with Machine Guns, and backed by artillery opposing the Aussies, who had not advanced very far from the beach. The rest, as they say, is history.
I am part of a small team which has just completed building a diorama using only "commercially available" figures and accessories. I fully understand the compromises one has to make with "historical accuracy". I do believe that we have to guard against dishing up something which the punters will like because it looks good, despite the facts.
Happy Collecting,
Oberstinhaber