Sorry to contradict you on this one Rob, but after seeing this one, I think its a a poor representation of the most famous British Gun of WW2
As far as the gun goes, its shown in the firing position, but the front shield is down, when it should be up, the gun is not on its platform, thats in the travelling position, and the No.3 gunner, the one laying and firing the gun isn't sitting on his seat.
Now with the gunners, there are 2 glaring errors.
1. the Sergeant, the No.1, would not be holding the rammer, thats used by the No.2, who is operating the breech, to ram home the projectile.
2, the No.4 who is loading the shell is the most glaring error, as he is holding a combined shell, with both the projectile and the cartridge case joined.
This was not the way the gun was loaded!
It was loaded by one ammo No. holding the projectile, which the loader, No.2, rammed into the breech, and then the next ammo No. loaded the cartrige case only, and the No. 2 closed the breech.
This Tamiya 1/35 kit I have assembled and painted is almost correct with the placement of the gunners, the gun's firing position, but the gun has a muzzle break, which is a later gun that that wasn't used in North Africa.
I hope this explains why I think its not a very good representation of this gun.
By the way, I'm speaking from experience, as I have served on these guns, and was on the last 25 Pounder shoot in the 1970's, when they were retired from the Australian Army, just after the withraw of Aussie Diggers from Vietnam, and we then went onto 105mm Howitzers.
John