Njja
1st Lieutenant
- Joined
- May 20, 2005
- Messages
- 4,566
Problem is no one is buying.
Warren's two purchases were unique, he basically loaned Goldman Sachs &
GE money with a guaranteed 10% yearly return. Something the average
shareholder could not do. He obtained "warrents" or rights to buy preferred
stock over a period of time for a sepecific price.
If your head isn't spinning yet it should be.
Steven Bronfman pulled a similar stunt to avoid $2 Billion in Taxes when he
sold his stake in Dupont. After the sale Dupont issued him useless "warrents"
(price was higher then actual market price) so they were worthless....but
in the eyes of the tax code since he still had the ability to purchase the
shares he sold.....there was no sale.
This is why so many people are upset, there is one set of rules for you and I
another set for the "Insiders"
By the way, after Bronfman's ploy the tax code was changed to prevent this
from happening again. The $2 Billion in taxes he avoided..........gone!
Warren's two purchases were unique, he basically loaned Goldman Sachs &
GE money with a guaranteed 10% yearly return. Something the average
shareholder could not do. He obtained "warrents" or rights to buy preferred
stock over a period of time for a sepecific price.
If your head isn't spinning yet it should be.
Steven Bronfman pulled a similar stunt to avoid $2 Billion in Taxes when he
sold his stake in Dupont. After the sale Dupont issued him useless "warrents"
(price was higher then actual market price) so they were worthless....but
in the eyes of the tax code since he still had the ability to purchase the
shares he sold.....there was no sale.
This is why so many people are upset, there is one set of rules for you and I
another set for the "Insiders"
By the way, after Bronfman's ploy the tax code was changed to prevent this
from happening again. The $2 Billion in taxes he avoided..........gone!