Hiroshima (1 Viewer)

jazzeum

Four Star General
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
38,433
Yesterday was the 70th anniversary of Hiroshima.

The New Yorker used the occasion of the anniversary to make available online John Hersey's article from the August 31, 1946 about Hiroshima. In 1999 the New York University School of Journalism chose it as the top work of journalism in the United States in the 20th Century.

From yesterday's New Yorker:

"Hersey began working on “Hiroshima” in 1945, when William Shawn, who was then the managing editor of The New Yorker, pointed out that, although the bombing had been widely written about, the victims’ stories still remained untold. After going to Japan and interviewing survivors, Hersey decided to show the bombing through six pairs of eyes. Originally, “Hiroshima” was planned as a four-part series. In the end, however, it was all published in a single issue, in August of 1946. There was nothing unusual about the cover, which showed ordinary people enjoying summertime. Inside, however, there was only “Hiroshima”—no Talk of the Town, no cartoons, no reviews. The piece’s impact was immediate. Parts of it were excerpted in newspapers around the world, and it was read, in its entirety, on the radio."

I had always heard about Hersey's article but never read it until yesterday.

Regardless of how you feel about the wisdom of the bombing, this is a moving article.

Hiroshima by John Hersey.

If anyone can't access it, but would like to read it, please pm and send me your email and I will send you a pdf.
 
Yesterday was the 70th anniversary of Hiroshima.

The New Yorker used the occasion of the anniversary to make available online John Hersey's article from the August 31, 1946 about Hiroshima. In 1999 the New York University School of Journalism chose it as the top work of journalism in the United States in the 20th Century.

From yesterday's New Yorker:

"Hersey began working on “Hiroshima” in 1945, when William Shawn, who was then the managing editor of The New Yorker, pointed out that, although the bombing had been widely written about, the victims’ stories still remained untold. After going to Japan and interviewing survivors, Hersey decided to show the bombing through six pairs of eyes. Originally, “Hiroshima” was planned as a four-part series. In the end, however, it was all published in a single issue, in August of 1946. There was nothing unusual about the cover, which showed ordinary people enjoying summertime. Inside, however, there was only “Hiroshima”—no Talk of the Town, no cartoons, no reviews. The piece’s impact was immediate. Parts of it were excerpted in newspapers around the world, and it was read, in its entirety, on the radio."

I had always heard about Hersey's article but never read it until yesterday.

Regardless of how you feel about the wisdom of the bombing, this is a moving article.

Hiroshima by John Hersey.

If anyone can't access it, but would like to read it, please pm and send me your email and I will send you a pdf.
Thank for posting the Brad , read a lot of books on Hiroshima when I was at school
 
Afternoon, Brad ... from a HOT and Humid mid-coast Maine. I just found this thread, sorry.
An excellent read for anyone who is interested in what happened after the bomb was dropped on On 6 August 1945, at 08:15 (Hiroshima time).

There is a "book" available (many on eBay at the moment) starting at only $0.99.
I found two copies, a long while ago, in an old book bin at a flea market.
Both for $1.00 ... seems like a shame that such a great book, about just a (justifiable) but horrific event should be so cheep ... {sm2}

Thank you for the post, I am re-reading it today while I enjoy a Popsicle.

FOLLOWUP: There are also books that contain the original Hersey post as well as the added (The Aftermath story) for about $5.00

--- LaRRy
 
Last edited:
Glad you found them interesting Larry. I found the first article riveting, the second a little less so. However, the second article showed how people manage to persevere when it looks like it’s the end of the world. It also showed how, economically, you will take any job to eat and have a roof over your head.

Brad
 
Watched 2 Jap(anese) movies about Hiroshima from the 50's last month. One depicted the actual bomb affects in gruesome dtail. Hard to watch. Chris
 
Watched 2 Jap(anese) movies about Hiroshima from the 50's last month. One depicted the actual bomb affects in gruesome dtail. Hard to watch. Chris
Chris, I watched those too. Rather remarkable and it was hard to watch. -- Al
 
Read this last night. Interesting take on the bomb and defence of Japan by Australian author.

SPECTATOR AUSTRALIA


The Empire’s atomic salvation


75 years ago, Japan was saved by the Bomb


The atomic bombings of Japan, which occurred 75 years ago this year, stunned and horrified the world.


The first blast, which obliterated Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, killed more than 100,000 people, mostly civilians. The second attack, which targeted Nagasaki on Aug. 9, killed another 80,000.


Most victims died in the immediate detonations and resulting firestorm; many additional thousands were burned or succumbed later from exposure to fallout. The misery continued: cancer rates in post-war Japan skyrocketed, while future generations suffered the long-term effects of radioactive contamination.


Yet, despite the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe stemming from the decision by the United States to drop the two bombs on Japan, a conventional military campaign to conquer the home islands, planned under the codename Operation Downfall, would almost certainly have exacted an even greater death toll. Here’s an assessment.


The Empire, though shattered in 1945, was far from beaten. Around 10,000 kamikaze aircraft awaited the troopships. The lesser known suicide speedboats would have attacked with similar numbers, while beneath the waves 600 submarines would have carried their one- and two-man crews on a one-way voyage. Exact figures are hazy, but around 35 million armed militia and regular forces would have fought the invading Allies.


Added to the prospective grim figures were the hundreds of thousands already dying every week in Japanese-held lands. If today you are an Indonesian, a Malaysian, a Chinese, or a member of any one of the myriad of countries and territories taken by the Empire, you too should be grateful for the B-29 bombers Enola Gay and Bock’s Car, and their crews, and the Manhattan Project which created the bombs they dropped.


There were approximately 300,000 POWs in captivity in Japan by mid-1945. As Allied troops landed, Japanese commanders would likely have made good on their plans to execute the prisoners en masse, thereby freeing up the guards to go and meet the invaders.


There would likely have been over a million Allied combat deaths as well. In fact, some have estimated as many as 15,000 Allied military fatalities a week through to the end of 1946. Unbelievable? From D-day in France, 6 June 1944, through to August 21, the Allies lost 73,000 dead.


Some have argued that there were alternatives: The Soviet Union’s entry to the war might have convinced the Empire to surrender, although there are no guarantees of that. Japan had famously beaten the Russians in 1905. Besides, the Soviet Union, which had most of its military might positioned in Eastern Europe, lacked the capability for amphibious assault. Furthermore, Russia had little naval forces in Pacific, and no aircraft carriers or battleships to gun the beaches as did Britain and the U.S. military.


Similarly so with any ideas of starving Japan out. The food supplies would have been switched in the main to the troops, hurting the common people even more. But they were preparing to die anyway: young teenagers were being pressed into training for armed resistance. The Japanese patriotic song “One Hundred Million Souls for the Emperor,” meant just that. One line went: “The day is near when the one hundred million people as one man will be in active resistance to the enemy.”


This was the ultimate irony. Dying made perfect sense to many in the bizarre world of wartime Japan. Millions of soldiers and sailors had already perished. How many more of Japan’s six million remaining men under arms would have been killed rather than surrender?


William Slim, one of the best fighting leaders of the war, expected the Allies to face tenacious defenders.


“There can be no question of the supreme courage and hardihood of the Japanese soldiers,” he wrote. “I know of no army that could have equaled them.” In fact, the Emperor’s troops died at a rate which some came to call the “Saipan ratio,” referring to the 97 per cent of the Japanese troops who fought to the death or committed suicide rather than surrender.


In the Home Islands Japanese schoolgirls learnt to use rifles, and women learnt sharpshooting so they could harass Allied troops from the mountains. The use of “satchel charges” was taught, where the user hurled oneself under an enemy vehicle and detonated it.


A Japanese doctor, Shuntaro Hida, working at the Army Hospital in Hiroshima, listed as one of his tasks the education of medical orderlies regarding the techniques of suicide bombing.


“The soldiers were trained to strap bombs to their bodies and throw themselves against the tanks,” he would later recall.


Even after the two atomic blasts the official line was propagated in the newspapers that the country would, and could, continue the war. A typical newspaper carried a headline: “No reason to fear new style bomb” and went on to review the new style countermeasures against the atomic weapons.


The loss of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were initially seen as no great obstacle to the steadfast orderliness of Japanese people continuing the war. One soldier on leave from Hiroshima when the first bomb fell, Toyofumi Ogura, simply reported for duty as the supervisor of a student work group charged with making hand grenades. They continued their task, even on the outskirts of a city which had seen massive destruction. The Allies dropped, to no avail, millions of leaflets advising people to petition their leader and evacuate their cities.


It took the decision of the Emperor to bring it all to a halt.


Even then a revolution began, to save him from the “misguided advice” he had received. But saner heads prevailed: “one plane, one bomb, one city” was so convincing an argument the war suddenly stopped, as the Emperor broadcast by radio his decision to the nation.


It is odd that over the years some people have pushed a concept that the use of the A-Bombs was wrong. Better, most people would agree, that in the terrible arithmetic of war, that 200,000 should die than many millions.
If the war had continued, it’s entirely possible that as many as 27 million Japanese might have died, as the Allied armies blasted their way from the initial landings zones at the Kyushu Peninsula up towards Tokyo. The mountainous terrain of the entire country would have favoured a cave and tunnels defence, and the Allies would have attacked with overwhelming artillery and airpower rather than risk their infantry. But Japan’s brave people would have been eventually annihilated. Ironically, The A-bombs, as horrible as they were, had indeed given salvation.


-o-o-O-o-o-


Atomic Salvation is published in Australia and the USA by Big Sky Publishing, and Casemate.
 
Afternoon, Brad ... from a HOT and Humid mid-coast Maine. I just found this thread, sorry.
An excellent read for anyone who is interested in what happened after the bomb was dropped on On 6 August 1945, at 08:15 (Hiroshima time).

There is a "book" available (many on eBay at the moment) starting at only $0.99.
I found two copies, a long while ago, in an old book bin at a flea market.
Both for $1.00 ... seems like a shame that such a great book, about just a (justifiable) but horrific event should be so cheep ... {sm2}

Thank you for the post, I am re-reading it today while I enjoy a Popsicle.

FOLLOWUP: There are also books that contain the original Hersey post as well as the added (The Aftermath story) for about $5.00

--- LaRRy

Larry,

Not trying to sabotage the thread, but I found that Admiral Yamamoto figure we talked about...oh I don't know...a year ago!

Anyway, one of the most humbling moments in my life was visiting the Hiroshima Peace Memorial in Hiroshima. I will never forget it to the day I die.

John from Texas
 
Watched 2 Jap(anese) movies about Hiroshima from the 50's last month. One depicted the actual bomb affects in gruesome dtail. Hard to watch. Chris
Terp,

What were the names of the movies?

John from Texas
 
Terp,

What were the names of the movies?

John from Texas

The two films were broadcast on TCM. THey were commissioned by a Jap(anese) agency (a teachers association?). THe first depicted Jap(anese) life a couple of yrs after the war. Can't remember the title or find it online. Maybe Lancer/Al can help here. The agency was not satisfied with the movie and commissioned the second to fully depict the horrors of the bomb. It shows the affects at the time of detonation. The title is, appropriately, Hiroshima. It's available on Amazon for purchase or rental. Both movies were produced with actors using makeup to depict their wounds and do not show actual victims. Chris
 
Were the movies Hiroshima and Children of Hiroshima? If you have the TCM app they should still be available. I also recommend Hiroshima Mon Amour, a French New Wave movie. That’s probably available on Amazon or the Criterion Channel.
 
You all have it correct. From my memory, the 2 films were Hiroshima (1953) and Children of Hiroshima (1952). Both were worth watching but were not easy to watch. -- Al
 
A new book has been published about Hiroshima and John Hersey called Fallout: The Hiroshima Cover-up and the Reporter Who Revealed It to the World.

Here is a review, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/04/books/review/fallout-hiroshima-hersey-lesley-m-m-blume.html

Here is a brief article in today’s Washington Post about the book,

The U.S. Hid Hiroshima’s Human Suffering. Then John Hersey went to Japan.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/hist...id=hp_no-name_hp-in-the-news:page/in-the-news
 
I shook hands with Paul Tibbets who piloted the Enola Gay many years ago at the Reading Airshow. It was a bit surreal because he was very elderly and feeble at that point. Hard to imagine his enormous role in his history. I 100% supported the decision to drop the bomb but that was a terrible decision to have to make and enormous responsibility for those who had to carry it out. My understanding is that Tibbets always supported the decision and believed he saved lives. And he probably did. I think he also piloted many famous WWII-era figures like Patton and Eisenhower.
 
...My understanding is that Tibbets always supported the decision and believed he saved lives. And he probably did...

Absolutely. From the millions projected to die had we had to invade the home islands, to the millions alive today because that sort of horrendous bloodshed was avoided, he certainly did.
 
Absolutely. From the millions projected to die had we had to invade the home islands, to the millions alive today because that sort of horrendous bloodshed was avoided, he certainly did.

No Kidding, one of them was my Grandfather who lived until 2018 to the ripe old age of 98. Literally in my family, Thank God For the Bomb! It saved him as he was slated on one of the first waves of the Invasion of Japan. For my family , we are eternally grateful for that decision and you will find zero apology from me on that one! Ironically, it occurred on my Birthday!

TD
 
All,

My grandfather was stationed on Tinian where the Enola Gay launched. I wish he was alive so I could hear him tell the story of that day.

John from Texas
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top