Historically Accurate (1 Viewer)

Combat said:
I am not familar with the 1/35 stuff that has been mentioned in several posts. What is it and why exactly is that considered more historically accurate? .

Not just 1/35th, but "scale models" as opposed to "collectibles" or "toy soldiers" are USUALLY considered more historically accurate, BUT they can suffer from the research, patience and skills of the builders. Most often a proper scale model has more research, more parts, more detail, and many times it will have aftermarket parts and corrections. There's no guarantee, but usually the models are "better" than the diecasts are collectibles. Just my humble opinion.

Gary
 
Due to the advise of a man that I have extreme respect for, Chuck Harris. I will remain with the forum...dispense with all conflict, and encourage no future hostility. But I do not apologize for my opinions and my standards...its over. I don't know where I will go from here, so for now I will keep my mouth shut and listen. Shannon's kindness was also a part of my decision.
 
Firebat said:
Due to the advise of a man that I have extreme respect for, Chuck Harris. I will remain with the forum...dispense with all conflict, and encourage no future hostility. But I do not apologize for my opinions and my standards...its over. I don't know where I will go from here, so for now I will keep my mouth shut and listen. Shannon's kindness was also a part of my decision.

I made a rather stupid remark, I am famous for those. I too am full of, well you know what. I am sorry for my offensive attitude and language.

I am glad you are staying. Opinions are important and the kind of personal remark I made are not. Standards should be high. I believe in excellence and achieving the best possible result.

By the way, I have been busy researching 101st airborne uniforms and I can not find much on the web in reference to the flags. One site, a guy and his 1/6 soldiers, does have something about pathfinders and wearing the flag but no reference is given.

The site is http://www.tekawiz.com/WW2pathfindermohawk.html and it says,
"Although U.S. flag brassards were worn by everybody in the 101st Airborne during the Market-Garden operation, they were not generally worn in Normandy by the 101st. Some units, such as the Pathfinders, wore them, but such instances in Normandy were few."


I guess I will have to try my local library and see if they have any WWII uniform reference books.
 
Combat said:
I am not familar with the 1/35 stuff that has been mentioned in several posts. What is it and why exactly is that considered more historically accurate?

1/35 is the most common scale of injection moulded plastic models used to depict military vehicles and figures. You buy the model as a kit and assemble and paint it, then apply the decals that represent the insignia etc.

There are many plastic kit companies, the most common being Tamiya and Dragon, together with older companies such as Airfix and Monogram. The use of small plastic parts enables a very detailed model, however the accuracy varies somewhat between manufacturers and moulds.

The are some companies such as Minichamps and more recently Dragon that have produced premade diecast tanks etc in 1/35 scale and these are much more detailed than King and Country and Forces of Valor etc. I would recommend that Firebat collect these as they are accurate and collectable and will also fit in exactly with his existing 1/35 plastic figures and vehicles.

I assembled plastic kits for many years and I guess they encouraged my interest in military stuff. If assembled and finished correctly you end up with an excellent example of the real thing.

However there are a number of serious downsides to injection plastic kits.

Firstly, the production costs are high, so you need to produce each mould in the thousands to expect a reasonable return. Therefore it's not a material that King and Country could use.

Once assembled, plastic model kits are virtually worthless and some upmarket kits can cost as much as a King and Country tank. Also I found they were very delicate and almost fall apart in your hands after a few years as the glue fails over time and you end up with bits falling off and getting lost, especially during changes of residence.

The other downside is that they take a good deal of time and effort to assemble well and the end result depends a great deal upon the ability of the builder.
 
Last edited:
Firebat said:
Due to the advise of a man that I have extreme respect for, Chuck Harris. I will remain with the forum...dispense with all conflict, and encourage no future hostility. But I do not apologize for my opinions and my standards...its over. I don't know where I will go from here, so for now I will keep my mouth shut and listen. Shannon's kindness was also a part of my decision.

Alex,

I am very glad to hear about this. I asked Chuck to give you a buzz today and I'm glad you guys talked. He's a person I also have a great deal of respect for as well as a good friend. I liked your dioramas (certainly you have more talent than I have) so keep those going and pointing out errors when you see them.

Regards,
 
101st
 

Attachments

  • bigWeWereABandOfBrothers.jpg
    bigWeWereABandOfBrothers.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 135
OzDigger said:
The are some companies such as Minichamps and more recently Dragon that have produced premade diecast tanks etc in 1/35 scale and these are much more detailed than King and Country and Forces of Valor etc. I would recommend that Firebat collect these as they are accurate and collectable and will also fit in exactly with his existing 1/35 plastic figures and vehicles.

Oz,
I have two of the MiniChamps 88mm Flak and agree that they are well detailed and the most accurate 88s that I've seen on the market. My only complaint is the lack of weathering on these guns. I've got one detailed with several kill rings on the barrel (the mark of a seasoned well used gun) but with a brand new factory finish.

Firebat,
Glad your staying. I, for one, appreciate the diversity you bring to the forum.
Semper Fi!
Rick
 
I've never checked out any of these companies. Any recommendations on desert stuff. You guys may have posted this once but any recs where to buy?
 
In regards to telescopic rifle positioning on Andy's figure firing. The German sniper rifle I own from my uncle, the scope is in the position that Andy shows. My scope is ahead of the receiver. I will post a picture when I get time. The rifle was a good model made in Berlin 1942,my uncle fought in Italy and Germany. Leadmen
 
Panzer said:
Oz,
I have two of the MiniChamps 88mm Flak and agree that they are well detailed and the most accurate 88s that I've seen on the market. My only complaint is the lack of weathering on these guns. I've got one detailed with several kill rings on the barrel (the mark of a seasoned well used gun) but with a brand new factory finish.

Firebat,
Glad your staying. I, for one, appreciate the diversity you bring to the forum.
Semper Fi!
Rick

Just be carefull handling those 88's as they can be as fragile as a kit! I know from experience. I have two - one for parts.
 
Brad,
I'm not that familiar with Dragon but I got both of my Minichamps 88s off Ebay. I don't have any of the Minichamps tanks so I can't comment on them except to say that they are not weathered in appearance. I don't believe that Minichamps has done an Afrika Korps 88 yet.

There are several Dealers on the Web and in US shops that sell them. You can "Google it" and find several on the web.

Here is a picture of one of my 88s that I weathered a few years back to make my own Afrika Korps version.

Semper Fi!
Rick
 

Attachments

  • side.JPG
    side.JPG
    29.3 KB · Views: 111
Thats what I would have done. Looks cool. Nice weathering.
 
Wooo Panzer,

That's nice. I love the 88's and I have many companies including two different models from Minichamps but yours is so sweet.

Nice job,

Carlos
 
Rick showed the members a beautiful 1/35 piece. I was requested to provide some 1/6 scale. 82nd Airborne Normandy $40. I have better ones than this, I haven't got the nerve to take them out if the box yet
 

Attachments

  • 101 1.jpg
    101 1.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 103
This one is for Charles, 101st / 502nd Haircut
 

Attachments

  • 101 1 (2).jpg
    101 1 (2).jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 91
Forrest Guth Easy / 506th. He sent me the picture, and I correspond with him on occasion. He was not depicted in Band of Brothers. He wrote a book which I also have. He is a real character. These pictures are for entertainment only and suggest no favorite scale, era or manufacturer
 

Attachments

  • 101 1 (1).jpg
    101 1 (1).jpg
    89 KB · Views: 92
For Charles again Tom Berrenger in Nam
 

Attachments

  • Berringer.jpg
    Berringer.jpg
    83.2 KB · Views: 93
Firebat, those looks great. Thanks for posting them. I remember as a kid, when GI Joe first came out, all the guys in my family thought they were just dolls for boys. Man have they changed.
 
.....Up to recently I thought the 1/32 were toyish, but I am very happy with my first K&C and Conte stuff, more is on the way. Not to rehash the subject in any way shape or form. I really like this stuff, and my observation was that these manufacturers are getting serious about realism, and that was right in line with my interests. Below a 1/6 Doirama I did a while back....Alex
 

Attachments

  • Firebat223-10-3.jpg
    Firebat223-10-3.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 79
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top