How Does K&C Decide on Cost??? (1 Viewer)

Just so we are clear.....my "$2 question" was just me being silly. I laughed when I saw the difference in price because I just thought it was strange or maybe even Andy stirring the pot in his own little twisted way knowing that at some point it might be brought up on here for discussion by us crazies! :p

Anyway....its the blue paint...right?? :D:D:D

Naw its not the blue paint. Andy's already explained that metal is more expensive than polystone. Its obvious that the $2 difference is cos the uncammo Chevy is polystone and the cammo Chevy is metal. Its the only reason for the $2 difference that makes sense. Besides Robs talking cat Charley told me so......:confused::confused::p:D:D
 
My Canadian Samurai you may want to spend some time other than in the K&C section of the forum. Your comments in reference to photos of collections etc. should be looked at. Both Shannon and Peter have made it a point to insure and have given us as members the oppurtunity to share and feature what we've collected. The King and Country Thread provides for those who prefer in many cases and not all to be like little old ladies or grumpy old men or opinionated gossip providers along with the cry babies to include the wisher a chance to past their time away. They are many find points that appear in the thread along with it's silliness which I for one don't care for but the thread is the most active for the reasons mention. We may or may not agree with Andy and his way of thinking, comments and what he brings to the market but it's his choice. I do not own one figure or item from KC it's not because I dislike what is offer but he currently does not have what I'm iinterest in collecting. I don't like getting involved in commenting in this thread but felt I had to. So now I'll go back to playing with my collection taking pictures to post along with my painted figures and mini dios as I put them together using what I feel is the best part of the forum that is offered and leave the rest of this debate to those whose intrest it sparks......The Lt.
 
Joe why would you post that?.Are you trying to insult K&C fans,i don't get it?.I thought it was a reasonable discussion.CS put his point,Andy answered and Louis has posted.I don't see any 'sillines'or anyone being shouted down,unless i've missed something?.Would appreciate you explaining your post a little more Joe.Unless you intended to insult us all?:confused:.

Rob
 
Why a warm welcome to Rutledge versus making CS conspisious by writing his ID in italic?

Is he a lesser valuable member because his opinion is not welcomed warmly?

Also, the question of SPICK0001 was legitimate and he was in his right to ask it without expecting the type of answer he received from Rutledge.

Just my opinion.

Pierre.
 
Just my 2RMB's worth to what looks like it could develop into yet another controversial and needless arguement.

EVERYONE's opinions ought to be welcome on this forum. Whether it be Rutledge, Pierre, Canadian Samurai, Rob, Me, Ron, Maddadicus, Andy Neilson, Louis, Brad.....or anyone else. We can all choose to agree or disagree with other people's opinions, but everyone has a basic right to express those opinions as long as they are not posted in an inappropriate or offensive manner.
As for silliness.....I refuse to apologise for contributing to the British humour on this forum. Take it or leave it as far as I'm concerned. :)
 
Pierre,

I'm not sure if you're asking this but whenever a member quotes another person's post, that person's name shows up in bold and his post is in italics.
 
Just my 2RMB's worth to what looks like it could develop into yet another controversial and needless arguement.

EVERYONE's opinions ought to be welcome on this forum. Whether it be Rutledge, Pierre, Canadian Samurai, Rob, Me, Ron, Maddadicus, Andy Neilson, Louis, Brad.....or anyone else. We can all choose to agree or disagree with other people's opinions, but everyone has a basic right to express those opinions as long as they are not posted in an inappropriate or offensive manner.
As for silliness.....I refuse to apologise for contributing to the British humour on this forum. Take it or leave it as far as I'm concerned. :)


You see Harry this is what really annoys me.No one was arguing,being nasty or anything like that.Its just a discussion between adults about the production of toy soldiers.And then someone comes along with the sole intent of causing an argument.I don't honestly think CS felt he was under attack at all,it didn't seem like it.




Rob
 
You see Harry this is what really annoys me.No one was arguing,being nasty or anything like that.Its just a discussion between adults about the production of toy soldiers.And then someone comes along with the sole intent of causing an argument.I don't honestly think CS felt he was under attack at all,it didn't seem like it.


Rob

It pi$$es me off as well.
Rutledge made some good points. CS responded in the way we've become used to - that's okay, he's perfectly entitled to do that. Andy and Louis chipped in with their tuppence worth. I then crack a wee joke for a bit of fun just as Wraith had done further back in this thread. Just the type of discussion a forum exists for IMO. Then we start getting the Lord Snooty stuff, although as I've said everyone is entitled to express their opinions. Its the deliberate attempt to stir the pot in a cold and calculated manner that I personally object to.
 
Joe why would you post that?.Are you trying to insult K&C fans,i don't get it?.I thought it was a reasonable discussion.CS put his point,Andy answered and Louis has posted.I don't see any 'sillines'or anyone being shouted down,unless i've missed something?.Would appreciate you explaining your post a little more Joe.Unless you intended to insult us all?:confused:.

Rob

Rob first and most important my post was not intended to insult anyone. You'll note prior to my silliness comment I stated that they are many fine points that are posted. It seems much to my dismay that any comments made are taken as personal. I had not seen Louis posting prior to my post and he's the last person on earth along with others I would insult. I also said that I do not like commenting on this thread and promise not to in the future. As for the KC fans your a group of your own and I find nothing wrong with your loyalty and devotion. As I stated in my post I'll go back to playing with my collection takeing photos and from now on keep from commenting on this thread...The Lt.
 
Pierre,

I'm not sure if you're asking this but whenever a member quotes another person's post, that person's name shows up in bold and his post is in italics.


H Brad-

I know that.

My comment was about the use by Andy of italics when he referred to CS.

Pierre.
 
But Joe you missed the point,we want you to post on this thread,your expertise in dios is stunning and we value your opinion.However you don't need to encourage CS not to come on here, he's a big boy and can look after himself.He's often involved in some of the best discussions on the forum.

Rob
 
Joe why would you post that?.Are you trying to insult K&C fans,i don't get it?.I thought it was a reasonable discussion.CS put his point,Andy answered and Louis has posted.I don't see any 'sillines'or anyone being shouted down,unless i've missed something?.Would appreciate you explaining your post a little more Joe.Unless you intended to insult us all?:confused:.

Rob

Rob first and most important my post was not intended to insult anyone. You'll note prior to my silliness comment I stated that they are many fine points that are posted. It seems much to my dismay that any comments made are taken as personal. I had not seen Louis posting prior to my post and he's the last person on earth along with others I would insult. I also said that I do not like commenting on this thread and promise not to in the future. As for the KC fans your a group of your own and I find nothing wrong with your loyalty and devotion. As I stated in my post I'll go back to playing with my collection taking photos and from now on keep from commenting on this thread...The Lt.
 
Pierre,

I'm not sure if you're asking this but whenever a member quotes another person's post, that person's name shows up in bold and his post is in italics.


Brad-

My mistake. It is not the use of italics but the use of quotation marks. Sorry.

Pierre.
 
Pierre,

I'm not sure if you're asking this but whenever a member quotes another person's post, that person's name shows up in bold and his post is in italics.


Ah Ha !

Another great mystery solved ! :rolleyes:
 
H Brad-

I know that.

My comment was about the use by Andy of italics when he referred to CS.

Pierre.

Pierre,

Yes, now I understand. I guess Andy will have to answer that one.
 
Rob my intent was not to discourage CS at all. It was to enlighten him that there's a How To Section of the Forum as well as a Diorama section that cause me to post.....Joe
 
I meant no offence Joe,i just hate to see more arguments on the forum.Nothing to do with me really just wanted to keep the peace!:)

Rob
 
I meant no offence Joe,i just hate to see more arguments on the forum.Nothing to do with me really just wanted to keep the peace!:)

Rob

As a General Aide no offense taken my General....The Lt.
 
I don't want to be accused of being a K&C dogmatist, because, while I happen to love K&C above all other makers, I have been one of the voices with what I hope is "constructive criticism" over the years. I am also willing to admit that on many occasions that I questioned Andy's decisions (remember my whole nobody will ever want to by polystone vehicles argument back in 1999, Andy?) I was dead wrong and Andy was dead on right.

I make no bones about the fact that I am a close friend of Andy and Gordon, and, like the rest of the members of this forum, I am a subjective collector (there is no such thing is pure "objectivity" among human beings, we all view things from our own perspective).

That being said (sort of a long winded disclaimer, sorry), I have to respectfully disagree with Canadian Samurai. Andy, Gordon and the rest of the K&C family have done more to improve the level of quality in our hobby than any other single company, hands down. Nobody, and I mean nobody was making realistic matt WWII toy soldiers when I started collecting in the early 1990's. Andy also produced realistic vehicles, aircraft and diorama materials when none of the other major toy soldier companies did so. He introduced the polystone vehicle (over my strenuous objections), and created the market for matt figures with matching vehicles and diorama materials that directly resulted in the launch of the other fine producers of these items today, like Honour Bound and Figarti. On every occasion that a group of collectors made a suggestion or a complaint to K&C about a possible improvement or perceived error (remember the track and clear window issues), and on every occasion that his competition made improvements or innovations, K&C rose to the challenge.

Andy is open to criticism, and has always been willing to make changes and improvements. I know that he makes an effort to be as accurate as possible, as I have been with him on his many trips to book sellers to obtain the necessary documentation. Every time he comes to Chicago or New York he leaves with a bunch of books on the vehicles, aircraft, uniforms and battles of the eras he addresses. At the symposium in March, he sat down with several members of this forum (myself included) and went through a book depicting photographs and drawings of various actual FW190's, allowing us to assist him in choosing the two he would produce (my choices didn't make the cut). He makes mistakes sometimes (he's only human), but they are definitely not for want of trying.


Louis-

Thanks for your post. Sharing your knowledge of Andy will help us to appreciate him better and better.

For one, I am pleased to discover a very charming man in K&C UK.

After all, we are subjective humans before being subjective collectors and the first impression(s) are often the wrong one(s).

Amitiés,
Pierre.
 
The post seems to have become a very wierd arena suggesting that it was an attack on K&C pricing. I was serious in asking the question as a newcomer to the hobby. Andy answered that in an intelligent and coherent way which is what I wanted. The answer to me made a lot a sense and with limited knowledge of how these prices are set, I appreciate the response.

SPICK0001
I for one did not take your question as an attack on Andy, but you being new have no way of knowing about the past. This response of yours shows me that you are a stand up person.
Welcome to the forum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top