ACW Cavalry
I think there are two issues - sections on the forum and coverage of the show.
I would have thought any manufacturer can post in the other manufacturers section and when they get sufficient coverage they get put on the first page. That is how TG started out.
Regarding the London show there are a mass of manufacturers and dealers and so I think it is reasonable that people will take pictures of things at the show that they like and collect; or that they think are different and interesting.
Personally, I am not interested in Glossy's but on this thread there are 20 of ATS alone (More than KC and Figarti combined) and 30+ of Little Legion - why? Because a mate on the forum asked me to take some pictures.
Did you or anyone post and ask for pictures of Asset? If not, I am sure one of us would have tried to help.
As to the comment "Many thanks though to those forum members that took the trouble to take the photos on the day. I as someone due to illness who could not attend appreciated the coverage provided albeit was geared towards the bigger manufacturers and the matt end of the hobby in the main." Was the last part necessary ?
We are fellow collectors, not reporters for the show and several of us spent hours of our weekend posting pics. Nothing to stop Glossy fans and their manufacturers doing it :smile2::smile2::smile2:
Cheers
Gazza
I think there are two issues - sections on the forum and coverage of the show.
I would have thought any manufacturer can post in the other manufacturers section and when they get sufficient coverage they get put on the first page. That is how TG started out.
Regarding the London show there are a mass of manufacturers and dealers and so I think it is reasonable that people will take pictures of things at the show that they like and collect; or that they think are different and interesting.
Personally, I am not interested in Glossy's but on this thread there are 20 of ATS alone (More than KC and Figarti combined) and 30+ of Little Legion - why? Because a mate on the forum asked me to take some pictures.
Did you or anyone post and ask for pictures of Asset? If not, I am sure one of us would have tried to help.
As to the comment "Many thanks though to those forum members that took the trouble to take the photos on the day. I as someone due to illness who could not attend appreciated the coverage provided albeit was geared towards the bigger manufacturers and the matt end of the hobby in the main." Was the last part necessary ?
We are fellow collectors, not reporters for the show and several of us spent hours of our weekend posting pics. Nothing to stop Glossy fans and their manufacturers doing it :smile2::smile2::smile2:
Cheers
Gazza