Luftwaffe double trouble advert (3 Viewers)

Hi Rob hope you and the family had a great Holiday season.Here are a few quick shots of the new 109.Mike B.
DSC00826.jpg

DSC00820.jpg

DSC00821.jpg

DSC00823.jpg
 
Looking at the photo the figures look to tall to the plane or the plane under carriage is to short , I checked this with real photos and crew should not be taller than the plane very odd
 
Looking at the photo the figures look to tall to the plane or the plane under carriage is to short , I checked this with real photos and crew should not be taller than the plane very odd

MAYBE MY FAULT 2 OF THE FIGURES ARE COLLECTORS SHOWCASE AND NOT k&c AND ARE A LITTLE LARGER.THE ONE IN THE FLIGHT GEAR IS A k%c FIGURE.IT is the angle the photo's were taken on.MIKE b.
 
MAYBE MY FAULT 2 OF THE FIGURES ARE COLLECTORS SHOWCASE AND NOT k&c AND ARE A LITTLE LARGER.THE ONE IN THE FLIGHT GEAR IS A k%c FIGURE.IT is the angle the photo's were taken on.MIKE b.
Thought it must be something like that as it not been a problem before with kc items
 
The A/C looks great and seems pretty well detailed. I myself have some concerns about the size of it in comparison to the figures. Even the PDF shows them being taller than the back fuselage. Could you take another picture at a different angle? I am considering this to be my first TC A/C purchase.
 
The A/C looks great and seems pretty well detailed. I myself have some concerns about the size of it in comparison to the figures. Even the PDF shows them being taller than the back fuselage. Could you take another picture at a different angle? I am considering this to be my first TC A/C purchase.

Here you go different angle Looks better to me size wise.Mike b.
DSC00827.jpg
 
Mike...

Great looking pics and nice figures I like the two figures of Galland and Goering
Mitch
 
Hi Rob hope you and the family had a great Holiday season.Here are a few quick shots of the new 109.Mike B.
DSC00826.jpg

DSC00820.jpg

DSC00821.jpg

DSC00823.jpg

Hi Mike, we did thanks and hope you did too.

Superb shots my friend, really nice. I'm in for the shot down version but everytime I see a pic of this one I'm tempted a little more^&cool

Rob
 
I have plans to pick up both 109,s this year ^&grin ,but the crashed one won't be displayed in a field in England i have a great DIO idea for it.
 
Going by a photo in this month toy soldier mag it had a photo of JJD Me 109 with a figure witch look spot on , witch mean something out of scale on the kc one as figures should not be taller than the plane
 
Going by a photo in this month toy soldier mag it had a photo of JJD Me 109 with a figure witch look spot on , witch mean something out of scale on the kc one as figures should not be taller than the plane

I would guess from the side by side photos of the planes they are about the same size. The JJD figures may be 1:30 like an FL figure while the K&C figure is their standard 1:28 scale so it would be oversized for the plane as it would be for an AFV. And keep in mind the figures have a base while the planes and AFVs do not.

Terry
 
I would guess from the side by side photos of the planes they are about the same size. The JJD figures may be 1:30 like an FL figure while the K&C figure is their standard 1:28 scale so it would be oversized for the plane as it would be for an AFV. And keep in mind the figures have a base while the planes and AFVs do not.

Terry

I think that it Terry
 
I would guess from the side by side photos of the planes they are about the same size. The JJD figures may be 1:30 like an FL figure while the K&C figure is their standard 1:28 scale so it would be oversized for the plane as it would be for an AFV. And keep in mind the figures have a base while the planes and AFVs do not.

Terry

Just checked my kc fw 190 and Me 262 and there no problem with the figures next to plane so it must be to do with the Me 109 hight
 
Here are some photos for you to judge height with. The first one shows the tail height and the last one shows the height just behind the cockpit at the grab handle. The 109 slopes so steeply, it's vital to compare height at the same points.

109 height 1.jpg109 height 2.jpg109 height 3.jpg

Terry
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top