M4 with fording stacks - first look... (1 Viewer)

binder001

Command Sergeant Major
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
2,729
Well guys, it came in yesterday's mail! Here's a first look and quick opinions.

Overall, a NICE model. The shape and finish are fine. The model looks just like what it claims to be. The tank represents an M4 that was fitted with ductwork to allow it to ford in water up to its turret. These tanks are not to be confused with the Duplex-Drive tanks that could float and "swim", the "wading" kits were added to allow a tank to exit a landing craft and move through moderately deep water on its way to the beach. The tanks so equipped were tanks in the assault waves that landed directly or immediate follow on units that came ashore before the beach facilities and Mulberry harbors were ready. Most units would land then proceed to an assembly area where most of the water proofing would be removed. The duct work abd their bases were usually shed at that time but there are photos of some tanks fighting with the rear trunking still in place (that would have been annoying for maintaining your tank!). As photographed the real tank had canvas waterproofing around the bow gun and the main gun mantlet, but this would have prevented the cannon from elevating on the model.

This tank model is marked from a famous photo of "Hurricane" a tank of the 2nd Armored Division. A couple minor quibbles with the markings; the turret "H2" was often in yellow, although the photo of "Hurricane" is B&W so that cannot be verified on this tank. The other detail is that the unit codes on the from read 2^86^ on the tank's right (with ^ meaning the Armored Force triangle) - however there wasn't an 86^ in the 2nd Armored! The two armored regiments in the 2nd were the 66th and 67th Armor. The 2nd and 3rd Armored Divisions were the only ETO tank units to fight under the old "heavy" organization of two armored regiments and one armored infantry regiment.

Anyway, this is a fine model and I recommend it. The wading stacks give it a difference from other models of Sherman that have been offered in 1/30th. I am looking forward to the dozer tank and any other upcoming Shermans from Figarti. Now I have to send off for one of those "beach" bases from Build-a-Rama to put it on.

Gary B.
 
I am headed To Sierra Toy Soldier, To meet Andy(K&C)(I think this is the second year in a row, That he is coming) and also to pick up the Sherman and The build-a-rama beach set. and will let everyone know on how it looks.
 
I completely forgot about this thread, The Sherman tank with the fording stacks. Looks great!!, the packaging, is again excellent (a little snug, But it didn"t damage anything). Definitely a must have!!.
And as far as The Build-a-rama set. I did not get it. Something else caught my eye. So anyone that has it please let us know,On how it looks. And if is a definite, must buy piece.
 
The Sherman is "Excellent".....best Sherman to date.....better than the firefly
 
I took my Sheman out of the box today and placed it with my other American troops and I have to say it is one of the finest tanks that I own. Rick and company have done a superb job. Bravo!
 
For my comments on this piece see thread "Still in King & Country's Corner"
 
Looks great! But, as NJJA said a lot of loose and falling parts (the tank commander's arm fell off). Also, the size is slightly bigger than the the Firefly (I was planning to rebadge one with British livery to go with my FF's). I guess I will have to selve the idea. Clearly these tanks were made by 2 different manufacturers.

Overall, great details. However, putting them side by side with KC is clearly night and day. The two don't blend well in a diorama.

Quality control wise, KC is far superior!

Just my POV
 
Looks great! But, as NJJA said a lot of loose and falling parts (the tank commander's arm fell off). Also, the size is slightly bigger than the the Firefly (I was planning to rebadge one with British livery to go with my FF's). I guess I will have to selve the idea. Clearly these tanks were made by 2 different manufacturers.

Overall, great details. However, putting them side by side with KC is clearly night and day. The two don't blend well in a diorama.

Quality control wise, KC is far superior!

Just my POV

For my comments on this piece see thread "Still in King & Country's Corner"

Hi Guys,

Much apologies for the problems (wading stack not fitting, damaged figure, loose parts, etc.) with your Sherman with Fording Stacks. I want to assume everyone that Figarti stands behind its products. If anyone needs help with repairs or part replacements, please feel free to private message me, we will certainly try to make things right. Please note that Figarti is currently closed for the National Day Holidays and will reopen next week. Again, sorry for any inconvenience caused, and as always, thank you for your support!

Rick
RWFigarti
 
Mine arrived in great condition and it is one of the best tanks I own..... quite possibly the best Sherman to date....IMO
 
After reading all of the complaints, I just had to recheck mine for the umpteenth time. And still can not find anything wrong. If the quality of the U.S. Priest, Is like this. Figarti, will have me as a loyal customer for years. buying a piece every month. Like now.
 
Mine arrived in great condition and it is one of the best tanks I own..... quite possibly the best Sherman to date....IMO

Vezz,

You and I agree!! Seriously, I love this tank, it is drop dead one of the most unique and detailed tanks I own, love it>

TD
 
I bought the wide BAR beach mat and the stack Sherman was the first AFV to hit the beach to be followed by the dozer Sherman and the Texas Priest as soon as I can unbox them. I like the style and finish of the tank, and with the new packaging it arrived in the mail in good shape.

I noticed some people having a problem fitting the stacks and also noticed the stacks on my model each fit a specific vent - almost like a matched set. If I switched them around one was too tight to fit. They do not fit snugly, but I can easily handle the tank without them falling off.

I rate the stack Sherman as a better model than the Firefly.

Terry
 
Mine arrived, and, after a side by side comparison, it is hands down a better vehicle than the Honour Bound Gold Edition version of the snorkel sherman I spent more than twice as much for. There is just no comparison, the sculpting and weathering is way better on the Figarti version. Top marks!:cool::cool::cool::cool:

There is, however, one drawback - once again Figarti quality control has a failure. There are small bits of metal chaff still attached to the outside bottom of the tracks on one side. I am not going to attempt to clear them myself, I will wait until the Symposium when one of Rick's Figarti team or someone else with modeling skills like Ken Osen can take the chaff off without damaging the rest of the tracks.
 
2009_1025tanks0014-1.jpg

2009_1025tanks0017.jpg

2009_1025tanks0018.jpg


Just got mine today,very nice indeed,the finish on this,the Firefly and the Dozer is really good,very realistic.

All in all another superb release from Figarti.

Rob
 
Oops! left it in the box!:eek:

Rob

That's what happens when you rush home from the toy show, rip the box open and in a frenzy, pull out the big pieces and start playing with it - without checking the whole package :eek::D:D

Terry
 
That's what happens when you rush home from the toy show, rip the box open and in a frenzy, pull out the big pieces and start playing with it - without checking the whole package :eek::D:D

Terry

Wow,its like you were there!!:D;)

Rob
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top