Can I just remind everyone there is no daily maximum!!! It is a monthly total of 250 posts.
Can I just remind everyone there is no daily maximum!!! It is a monthly total of 250 posts.
At the rate some are still posting it is going to get very quiet near the end of the first monthly period. Some could go quiet much before then.
Oh, good, I can catch up on my sleep.
From what I understand it's a rolling 250 in any thirty day cycle.
This could be a good revenue raiser. If you run out of posts, perhaps you can buy posts from someone who doesn't need them.
I believe we understand that. Give us a little credit.
It appears that not everyone does Brad, that is why I posted it.
Give me some credit also.
It's been explained to me twice and I still don't get it. It looks like it is meant to reduce the number of posts from 8 or so prolific posters, a few of whom engage in arguments. But it won't catch most of the arguers. Sounds like there were many complaints about the prolific posters or Pete and Shannon wouldn't be doing this.
It's not hard to cut down to 250 posts per month, even for Rob (not sure if Mitch or Bayern can do it )
And the system could evolve? So we will have to live with it or not.
In the Meantime
COMING SOON TO A FORUM NEAR YOU
In the middle of an argument and running out of posts. Want to start a fight but are too near your posting limit.
Well, help is on the way. Starting August 12, Terry's Posting Service is open for business.
Put Your Words In Our Mouth.
Have your PMs converted to posts
Timely Service
Reasonable Rates.
Sign up today.
Had the same thoughts like Terry.
If the restriction of total posts within a certain period was aimed at cutting down on arguments, it will fail of course.
If someone is out to start an argument or sprinkle comments into an ongoing discussion that will most likely raise arguments, he sure won't need the amount of 250 posts in 30 days to do so, so he will never run into a situation that a limit of posts could keep him from "baiting", "mocking" or whatever all that is called.
^&grin Oh, and Rob, if you read this, every first week of a month and every London Show, you have 150 posts with "kogu's posting service" ^&grin :wink2:
But I honestly still believe that it won't be necessary. There is no point in this new rule and it will quickly show.
Konrad
Had the same thoughts like Terry.
If the restriction of total posts within a certain period was aimed at cutting down on arguments, it will fail of course.
If someone is out to start an argument or sprinkle comments into an ongoing discussion that will most likely raise arguments, he sure won't need the amount of 250 posts in 30 days to do so, so he will never run into a situation that a limit of posts could keep him from "baiting", "mocking" or whatever all that is called.
^&grin Oh, and Rob, if you read this, every first week of a month and every London Show, you have 150 posts with "kogu's posting service" ^&grin :wink2:
But I honestly still believe that it won't be necessary. There is no point in this new rule and it will quickly show.
Konrad
Capitalism is a wonderful thing.^&grin -- AlDay 1 and there is already posting service competition {eek3} {sm4}
Terry