OzDigger
Colonel
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 8,346
Oz, it is not really accurate to portray the Boer war as an evenly matched struggle between two empires. The Boers (who were French as well as Dutch) first arrived in the 1650s but by the late 1800s they had become a distinct people with their own identity and culture (much like America). Consequently they couldn't count on a lot of support from their ancestral home. They had to rely on their own militia to fight a guerrilla campaign against professional British Empire soldiers, and their objective was just to be left alone to continue their lives as farmers, not ship Africa's resources back for the glory of the home empire like Britain intended. Britain waged total war against a small group of freedom-loving people, not an empire. Consequently the majority of the Boers who died in the British concentration camps were civilians: women and children. If that's not something to be ashamed of, I don't know what is. We certainly haven't ever let the Germans forget the same kind of behaviour during WW2.
But Damien said Sefricans don't have any culture, now I'm confused
Seriously though, the Boer/Afrikaners had plenty of blood on their hands including that of women and children. And for that matter they clearly had to take "their" land from several African native people in the first place. The same situation has occured in most countries over the centuries, including Australia and the US. Now can we move on.