My favorite commanders (2 Viewers)

Oz, it is not really accurate to portray the Boer war as an evenly matched struggle between two empires. The Boers (who were French as well as Dutch) first arrived in the 1650s but by the late 1800s they had become a distinct people with their own identity and culture (much like America). Consequently they couldn't count on a lot of support from their ancestral home. They had to rely on their own militia to fight a guerrilla campaign against professional British Empire soldiers, and their objective was just to be left alone to continue their lives as farmers, not ship Africa's resources back for the glory of the home empire like Britain intended. Britain waged total war against a small group of freedom-loving people, not an empire. Consequently the majority of the Boers who died in the British concentration camps were civilians: women and children. If that's not something to be ashamed of, I don't know what is. We certainly haven't ever let the Germans forget the same kind of behaviour during WW2.

But Damien said Sefricans don't have any culture, now I'm confused :)

Seriously though, the Boer/Afrikaners had plenty of blood on their hands including that of women and children. And for that matter they clearly had to take "their" land from several African native people in the first place. The same situation has occured in most countries over the centuries, including Australia and the US. Now can we move on.
 
The "small group of freedom-loving people that Britain waged total war against", were the same group of people who introduced the most disgusting system of government since Germany in the 1930's. I wonder how many people "fell down the Police Station stairs" during the years of Apartheid.

There now, I've had my say......So as Oz suggests, lets move on.
 
Last edited:
I don't really want to inject myself into this Commonwealth debate :) (only kidding guys) but all of the countries of which we are citizens have parts of which we cannot be proud. What Americans did in the guise of nation building (e.g. "manifest destiny") to the native Americans and the African Americans are shameful episodes. While we can never forget what happened (let's relegate them to the history books), let us hope that these episodes teach us something for the future.
 
The "small group of freedom-loving people that Britain waged total war against", were the same group of people who introduced the most disgusting system of government since Germany in the 1930's. I wonder how many people "fell down the Police Station stairs" during the years of Apartheid.

There now, I've had my say......So as Oz suggests, lets move on.

If you ever get the chance, watch the movie "Cry Freedom" which is about Donald Woods and Steve Biko and South Africa. The list at the end will show you how many "fell down the stairs", "suicide by hanging", "natural causes", etc.
Steve
 
If you ever get the chance, watch the movie "Cry Freedom" which is about Donald Woods and Steve Biko and South Africa. The list at the end will show you how many "fell down the stairs", "suicide by hanging", "natural causes", etc.
Steve

Thanks Steve.
I have indeed seen that movie. What those peaceful, freedom loving, simple farmers did after Britain left them to govern themselves is all well documented. Just goes to show what I've always maintained. No one country, or group of people, has a monopoly on the moral high ground. I rest my case M'Lud.
 
Last edited:
I never said the Boers were overly peaceful. Just that they wanted their freedom like any other distinct people. A strong connection has been made by historians between the humiliation that the Boer people endured at the hands of the British Empire and their sense of grievance and being besieged by all sides which eventually helped encourage the apartheid system so they could regain the control of their destiny they had lost. Much like the humiliation caused by the Versailles Treaty laid the groundwork for the rise of the Nazis in Germany.

And as Brad said, I don't think any Western country can boast about its treatment of indigenous people so lets not throw stones at the South Africans.

Harry, I also agree completely that no group of people in history has a pure record. That’s why it’s important not to sweep any of it under the rug. The lesson is not about which country has done good or bad things (who cares!), but about how the barbaric aspects of human nature that all of us share have been allowed to be unleashed despite the best efforts of our civilization to contain them. So in every country through history we can see people who are only out for their own self gain, who have no honour or mercy, and who are willing to suppress, exploit and kill anyone they can. And then there are those who think – “hmm, hold on, maybe that’s not such an ethical or smart thing to do. Maybe we should show other humans (and animals) some respect and live and let live, if only because it will be better for our own interests in the long run”.

So in the case of the Boer war you had some greedy barons who wanted to get rich off of exploiting and exporting the newly discovered gold and diamonds in South Africa, and so they agitated and pushed for war to remove the obstacles (the Boers in this case) that were preventing them from lining their own pockets. But back home in Britain and the commonwealth at the time there were also lots of people opposed to starting a war with the Boers. Hopefully Harry you and Oz and I would have been among them. That's not being hippy - it's about showing our humanity and compassion which is the only thing that separates us from prehistoric savages.
 
Australians are very proud of their country, but we are not a zealous people, being more reserved like the British tend to be. I admit that we could do with some more American optimism, but I feel our cynicism has served us well over the years. For example, it has made us very wary of politicians and we keep ours on a tight leash. I have never been in a war but I have spoken to several Australian soldiers including my Grandfather who served in WWI and a cousin that fought in Vietnam. All said that they soon forgot about any "fighting for your country" thoughts as they were to busy fighting for each other.

I know what you meant when you said "I don't much respect folks who won't take a stand either way" because you feel a person should at least make a committment. However I feel that about 80% of any population are ambivalent on most subjects, unless something affects them on a personal level.
Yes, that's true. About patriotism, though, in the US I wouldn't say it carries the "zealous" aspect of its dictionary definition--the word is used to the point of cliche in the US, probably due to the terming of the original rebellious colonial Americans as "Patriots." I normally hear it used to mean national pride or love of country.:)

Back to "my favorite commanders," can I suggest Stephen Decatur for Number 1, and perhaps Commodore Edwin Moore for 2?
These poor guys get overlooked!!!
 
I never said the Boers were overly peaceful. Just that they wanted their freedom like any other distinct people. A strong connection has been made by historians between the humiliation that the Boer people endured at the hands of the British Empire and their sense of grievance and being besieged by all sides which eventually helped encourage the apartheid system so they could regain the control of their destiny they had lost. Much like the humiliation caused by the Versailles Treaty laid the groundwork for the rise of the Nazis in Germany.

Its the first I've ever heard of apartheid being Britain's fault, but I'll let that go. My original objection was the assertion of the "British Empire's dirty work", implying that everything about the Empire was bad. Even today, Indians I talk to tell me that we gave them as much as we took. In addition, during the partition of India and Pakistan there must have been millions who were longing for a return to the British rule of law and order.
Look, you obviously believe that everything about the Empire was bad. That's okay, I respect your right to hold any opinions you wish. Therefore I believe that I have the same right to object when my opinions and pride in my country's heritage, history and achievments are disparaged. I believe that some aspects of Empire were good (e.g. abolition of the slave trade), while some aspects were not so good for all concerned. Perhaps I am a just a little more patriotic than most simply because I've lived outwith the UK for so long.
So, I suggest that we agree to disagree. I would simply request that such sweeping comments be more carefully considered before being posted in future because some of us do object to what we, rightly or wrongly, perceive as continual Brit Bashing.
 
Last edited:
My favourite commanders, in no particular order;

Orde Wingate
Patton
Slim
Ike
Stonewall Jackson
William Barret Travis
Alexander The Great
Vinegar Joe Stillwell
Sam Houston
Monty
 
Yes, that's true. About patriotism, though, in the US I wouldn't say it carries the "zealous" aspect of its dictionary definition--the word is used to the point of cliche in the US, probably due to the terming of the original rebellious colonial Americans as "Patriots." I normally hear it used to mean national pride or love of country.:)

Back to "my favorite commanders," can I suggest Stephen Decatur for Number 1, and perhaps Commodore Edwin Moore for 2?
These poor guys get overlooked!!!

Tex,
Excuse my lack of knowledge. Can you please tell me who these two guys were and what they did?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Look, you obviously believe that everything about the Empire was bad. That's okay, I respect your right to hold any opinions you wish. Therefore I believe that I have the same right to object when my opinions and pride in my country's heritage, history and achievments are disparaged. I believe that some aspects of Empire were good (e.g. abolition of the slave trade), while some aspects were not so good for all concerned. Perhaps I am a just a little more patriotic than most simply because I've lived outwith the UK for so long.
So, I suggest that we agree to disagree. I would simply request that such sweeping comments be more carefully considered before being posted in future because some of us do object to what we, rightly or wrongly, perceive as continual Brit Bashing.

My apologies Harry... I think you misinterpreted my response to a post about the Boer War as a sweeping generalization... Given that nationalist sensitivities to academic historical discussions run very high on this forum (Monty vs. Patton anyone :rolleyes:), I see now I should have worded my original reply as: "The British Empire's dirty work in the Boer war". I certainly do not think every aspect of the British Empire was bad - as you said it was ahead of many countries in abolishing slaves/serfdom as well as introducing certain laws and government systems that were beneficial to the welfare of the people in its colonies. I don't think anyone cries about the fact that Britain wiped out the mythical Thuggee Death Cult in India. If Britain had not colonized many of the countries that it did, then others like the French, Germans, Americans, Danish, Dutch, Portugese or Spanish probably would have, and these Empires could have been even more exploitive - we will never know.

And if it makes you feel better I will now put on my modern nationalist hat one more time: Of course Canada (which I am a citizen) has strong historic ties to the Empire - we're made up of the United Empite Loyalists after all and your Queen is still our head of state. The sacrifice of British troops in the war of 1812 allowed us to maintain our independence - in turn our sacrifice during WW1 and 2 helped the British to maintain theirs (if the Battle of Britain had been lost, Canadians would have constituted the main land force defending the British mainland from German invasion!). Given our historic ties I am not sure why today the "Special Relationship" refers only to the partnership between the US and Great Britain.
 
Okay.....Peace has been declared on the forum - at least until the next time someone fights with someone else. Lets move on to Toy Soldiers. :)
 
Amen! And no more digging up zombie threads that deserve to be buried where they died! :D

Well, unfortunately that's the risk you take if you want to set yourself up as the holier-than-thou politically correct voice of the forum.
And not all of us have 24/7 access to the internet either. I'm still catching up on posts that I've missed while I didn't have the said access and fully intend to reply to zombie threads that deserve to die, wherever I find them. :D:D:D
 
Having finished the excellant 'Armageddon' by Max Hastings i hope i now have a more balanced and realistic view of some of the personalities involved in the final year of the war.I am still a Monty fan and always will be,he was without doubt tactically gifted in many ways and it must not be forgotten that (admittedly with intelligance assistance)out thought Rommel in North Africa as well as inspiring his men to victory.However he made some truly awful blunders and not just at Arnhem.The airborne crossing of the Rhine was a shambles with so many brave men losing their lives needlessly so near to the end.The huge set piece crossing of the Rhine with huge bombardment was grandiose in the extreme.As far as Patton is concerned 'Hot headed' and arrogant do not really do it justice.Some (including his own officers)considered him mentally unstable and that it was criminal he was not prosecuted and thrown out of the army for the raid to set free his son in law that cost many lives.On the plus side his results were spectacular,his drive across France legandary and he was the only allied general the Germans truly feared.

But what i have learnt most of all is something that i already knew.(if that makes sense!!:rolleyes:)That however brave and however wonderfully well our troops fought it was a fraction of what the Russians went through.The cost in lives that Germany and Russia paid was staggering,and after what the Germans did in Russia i think the Russians deserved Berlin.

However one thing is crystal clear.The troops of the US/UK did not lower themselves to the levels of animals to commit such barborous and savage acts against civilians as did the Russians.Although there were outbreaks of criminality in our ranks the mass rape of every female of any age they came across did not happen.This is where the troops of Great Britain and the United states stood head and shoulders above Germany,Russia and Japan.They did the job they had to do and went home.

Rob
 
Having finished the excellant 'Armageddon' by Max Hastings i hope i now have a more balanced and realistic view of some of the personalities involved in the final year of the war.I am still a Monty fan and always will be,he was without doubt tactically gifted in many ways and it must not be forgotten that (admittedly with intelligance assistance)out thought Rommel in North Africa as well as inspiring his men to victory.However he made some truly awful blunders and not just at Arnhem.The airborne crossing of the Rhine was a shambles with so many brave men losing their lives needlessly so near to the end.The huge set piece crossing of the Rhine with huge bombardment was grandiose in the extreme.As far as Patton is concerned 'Hot headed' and arrogant do not really do it justice.Some (including his own officers)considered him mentally unstable and that it was criminal he was not prosecuted and thrown out of the army for the raid to set free his son in law that cost many lives.On the plus side his results were spectacular,his drive across France legandary and he was the only allied general the Germans truly feared.

But what i have learnt most of all is something that i already knew.(if that makes sense!!:rolleyes:)That however brave and however wonderfully well our troops fought it was a fraction of what the Russians went through.The cost in lives that Germany and Russia paid was staggering,and after what the Germans did in Russia i think the Russians deserved Berlin.

However one thing is crystal clear.The troops of the US/UK did not lower themselves to the levels of animals to commit such barborous and savage acts against civilians as did the Russians.Although there were outbreaks of criminality in our ranks the mass rape of every female of any age they came across did not happen.This is where the troops of Great Britain and the United states stood head and shoulders above Germany,Russia and Japan.They did the job they had to do and went home.

Rob

Hear Hear!
 
Having finished the excellant 'Armageddon' by Max Hastings i hope i now have a more balanced and realistic view of some of the personalities involved in the final year of the war.

Yes Rob,
Its a very thought provoking book.
 
Thank you Louis and Harry.Hastings next book (in October)'Nemesis' about the defeat of Japan sounds like it will be excellant too.Although i imagine some of it will make for harrowing reading indeed.

Rob
 
Rob,

I would take issue with you about what the Russians did in Germany. While not excusable, it was somewhat understandable compared to what the Germans did in Russia, where the goal was complete annihilation. The Germans also let loose emotions that had been simmering for probably centuries as many ethnic groups lived together in close proximity. It didn't take much to get that cauldron boiling.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top