Gentleman,
I was discussing the set 'jes make sure he's dead" with Tim Tyler when I was at Troops of Time yesterday and we determind that he is not kicking the soldier or about to blast away at him at point blank range. He pointed out that the soldier is turning him over to see what kinds of wounds he has etc. He might hav killed him latter but not with a BAR.
Whilst not so senior in rank as other leaders mentioned I think Oddball from Kelly's Heroes has to rank highly !!! Now don't ruin it by telling me he wasn't real. How about a Ltd Ed set of his Sherman shooting the back of a Tiger with paint. Classic !
I hate to break it to everyone, but killing prisoners and the like was done by virtually every army in history. Didn't Henry V kill the French knights at Agincourt and Saladin executed all the Kinights Templar at Hattin. If a frbnech voltigeur was captured by Spanish partisans in the Penisnsualr war then things were not much fun for him either. Accroding to John Keegan in the Face of Battle there were several reported incidents of this by the Australians and British and Canadians during the first world war. The point is that these were by and large the exceptions. Other armies carried this out almost as a matter of routine. Breaker Morant proably was a victim of the need for a scapegoat but the practice of killing Boer prosoners was proably widespread. Certainly putting them into concentration camps and burning their farms caused a great deal of suffering. The practice of paying ransom for captured SWAPO geurillas menat that the SA police units had to bring back dead bodies to claim their bonus. They used to strap the corpses to the back of their armoured vehicles.
In light of all this could we pLease be a litle less thin skinned about our national honour in our discussions.
I hate to break it to everyone, but killing prisoners and the like was done by virtually every army in history. Didn't Henry V kill the French knights at Agincourt and Saladin executed all the Kinights Templar at Hattin. If a frbnech voltigeur was captured by Spanish partisans in the Penisnsualr war then things were not much fun for him either. Accroding to John Keegan in the Face of Battle there were several reported incidents of this by the Australians and British and Canadians during the first world war. The point is that these were by and large the exceptions. Other armies carried this out almost as a matter of routine. Breaker Morant proably was a victim of the need for a scapegoat but the practice of killing Boer prosoners was proably widespread. Certainly putting them into concentration camps and burning their farms caused a great deal of suffering. The practice of paying ransom for captured SWAPO geurillas menat that the SA police units had to bring back dead bodies to claim their bonus. They used to strap the corpses to the back of their armoured vehicles.
In light of all this could we pLease be a litle less thin skinned about our national honour in our discussions.
Perhaps it is a combination of both. There is, however, absolutely nothing wrong with patriotism, in my opinion.
I'd say that the US troops are just rolling the body over. I say this because the soldier with the thompson is leaning in to get a closer look, and if they were about to blast the body away, esp. with a BAR, that soldier would be completely splattered with, well, use your imagination.
As an aside, when I was in Europe a month ago for my first time, I noticed that, except for the British, no one seemed to care much about national honor, and people frowned on patriotism in general. I am sorry, but to me, that is somewhat backwards. Maybe it was just the folks I met. In any case, I am a patriotic American, and I respect anyone who is patriotic to their own country, or not, as long as they have good reason. I don't much respect folks who won't take a stand either way.
But that is just my opinion, and you are all entitled to your own. I mean no offense to anyone, just stating my take on things.![]()
Alan Moorehead is a wonderful writer. His book about the Desert War is one of those must read, IMHO. I would also recommend his books on the Nile (The Blue Nile and the White Nile). Thanks for the recommendation on Eclipse. I am going to order it.
Australia and Canada should never have been over there doing the British Empire's dirty work. That was a pretty shameful war for all concerned.
Who dredged up this old thread again?
Harry, the other half of me is pure UK: English, Irish, Scottish mix. I don't want to get into a huge debate with you about the merits of the Boer war, but as Damian has already indicated a lot of very, very bad things happened (i.e. the first modern concentration camps) because the British came along and decided they wanted to uproot those evil little Boer farmers from their land.
As for patriotism, it's like Goldilock's porridge: it's best to have not too little and not too much.
Oz, it is not really accurate to portray the Boer war as an evenly matched struggle between two empires. The Boers (who were French as well as Dutch) first arrived in the 1650s but by the late 1800s they had become a distinct people with their own identity and culture (much like America). Consequently they couldn't count on a lot of support from their ancestral home. They had to rely on their own militia to fight a guerrilla campaign against professional British Empire soldiers, and their objective was just to be left alone to continue their lives as farmers, not ship Africa's resources back for the glory of the home empire like Britain intended. Britain waged total war against a small group of freedom-loving people, not an empire. Consequently the majority of the Boers who died in the British concentration camps were civilians: women and children. If that's not something to be ashamed of, I don't know what is. We certainly haven't ever let the Germans forget the same kind of behaviour during WW2.