Larry Allen
2nd Lieutenant
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,876
"In 1943, Oklahoma was righted and salvaged. UNLIKE THE OTHER BATTLESHIPS THAT WERE RECOVERED FOLLOWING PEARL HARBOR, THE OKLAHOMA WAS TOO DAMAGED TO RETURN TO ACTIVE DUTY. Her wreck was eventually stripped of her remaining armament and superstructure before being sold for scrap in 1946. The hulk sank in a storm in 1947, while being towed from Oahu, Hawaii, to a breakers yard in San Francisco Bay."
" A view among critics of the bombings, that was popularized by American historian Gar Alperovitz in 1965, is the idea of atomic diplomacy: that the United States used nuclear weapons in order to intimidate the Soviet Union in the early stages of the Cold War."
Maybe they should rehire her...………...…..:wink2:
On top of what George has had to say, how did you think, Larry, that it was your role to get involved in this situation and contribute to making it an issue that led to her dismissal. If you were a parent, I would have a greater appreciation for your role but you weren't.
As you relate it -- and I assume you are correctly relating the mistakes she made -- none of them are egregious or material, certainly nothing to create a fuss about. In addition to the Oklahoma point, she is not wrong about Nagasaki; there is a school of thought that says it was a demonstration to the Russians that we have many Atomic weapons. Little did we know that the Russians had this information already due to Russian espionage.
Lastly, political geography is a branch of study: it is the branch of geography that deals with the boundaries, divisions, and possessions of countries.
<><><><><><><><><>
Evening Mr. George, Brad,
With regard to the first point, the USS Oklahoma, ... she was totally incorrect in stating that only the USS Arizona was not raised and returned to active service. The USS Oklahoma, being salvaged for the steel, is not the same as being refloated and "upgraded" to active service to fight again.
Maybe :rolleyes2: a weak argument can be made that her steel went into the building the future Battleships and Carriers that took the war to the Japanese, but that would be more metaphorical in nature than historical fact. The statement that was presented above supports that argument.
On point number 2, the atomic bomb at Nagasaki.
This debate is way beyond the scope of this thread (I apologize for the high jacking of the original topic .. )
The atomic bomb(s) were used 74 years ago and arguments for and against it's use will never be resolved. Like other threads in this forum, this can be a personal and heated topic, of which I do not wish to engage.
Gar Alperovitz book, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam was written in 1965. To comfortably sit 20 years after the event makes it easy to criticize decisions made when one can view them with no emotional inputs or ramifications. At the time, the Truman Administration (or really Harry) had to make a monumental decision. Without doubt, he made the right decision. Additional information is constantly being discovered about WWII.
For all the books you can show against the use of Fat Man and Little Boy there are other authors that show the opposite.
Prompt and Utter Destruction:: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs against Japan Paperback – June 1, 2017
by J. Samuel Walker (Author).
We will simply have to agree to disagree on this point.
<><><><>
I agree, her mistakes were not egregious or material, certainly nothing to create a fuss about.
I had ZERO intent of starting an argument with the teacher or the school; my goal was simply helping out the kids who were being misled by an ignorant teacher. After showing them the TRUTH, I forgot about the whole thing.
It wasn't until I received a letter telling me I was wrong about my facts and not to talk to the students concerning their assignments, that it heated up.
Even then, I was a bit hesitant about going further. It wasn't until the parents of 3 of the kids called me and asked me what had happened. One thing led to another and I was up to my cheeks in alligators …
We can go on and argue this "To Infinity and Beyond" as Buzz Lightyear would say, but I would prefer to just say you and George are wrong and go on ^&grin
Have a good night gents!
--- LaRRy