boerboy
Staff Sergeant
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2007
- Messages
- 963
The only approach that seems to work with hardline regimes like commies is a firm, direct one—what some might call a “shotgun approach.” Trust me, I know from experience. A coalition might be ideal in theory, but who would it include? Countries that have taken advantage of our economy for the last 50 years?Pretty good article. It is opinion in a lot by drawing conclusions, but some of them are probably true. The one thing I wonder is who will be the White Knight country that brokers a deal between the US and China. Someone (one of our allies) will feel enough pain, maybe all of them and step in. I don't know when, but I do think it is a probability.
For me, going after China is the right thing to do, but I disagree vehemently with the seemingly shotgun approach and including all Countries that he could think of. We would have been better served by a coalition against China and maybe we will get there. Painful wait.
TD
In regards to China. They've stolen both American and European technologies for years. Their high-speed rail system? Taken from the French. Their top-performing car engines? Ripped off from BMW. Politicians have talked for decades about taking action, yet have done virtually nothing. Then, when someone finally steps up and tries to do something—imperfect as it may be—they get dragged through the mud instead of being supported for putting the country first.
To me, that's the definition of hypocrisy—with a capital H.