Desertkiwi
1st Lieutenant
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Messages
- 4,568
In the US the term "black" at least where I live is used to describe people of African decent,no one else.The people of African decent that I know call themselves black not African just like I don't call myself European but white.
Mark
Thanks Mark, yes I'm aware of it's use in the US to describe those of Africans decent and that's one of the reasons I raised it in my post. Although I completely understand the whole 'black & white' phrase thing when referring to race is totally accepted as the norm in the US, else where it can be considered offensive.
In saying that, I don't have an issue with other Nationalities using the term in their own countries, but use the word 'black' here to describe the Maori & Pacific Island population and it would go down like a lead balloon. Put it this way, if I used it in any context regarding race while at work, I'd get myself in some serious trouble.
However our use of the term 'Jap/s' to describe Japanese troops in WW2 is totally acceptable here and no one would banter an eyelid if you used it in that context.
As Brett pointed out, the Japanese conduct both during and prior to WW2 in Asia and the Pacific is still a very sensitive issue for many of us down here. I personally have nothing but utter contempt for their troops and will never own a Japanese TS figure unless it's on the receiving end of some cold steel.
For example, they beheaded a group of our 'coast-watchers' (civilians) captured on several Pacific Islands during WW2 and to date have refused to tell us where they were eventually buried. Such atrocities leave lasting scars, even today.
I don't have a problem with modern Japan or it's population and would never refer to them as 'Japs', however as for their fellow countryman during WW2, I have nothing nice to say about them.