UKReb
Command Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 2,436
..................................
I wonder if he has any idea of the adventures that now await him!
With Rebs or Indians John????
Reb
..................................
I wonder if he has any idea of the adventures that now await him!
Nice, who makes him?Picked this guy up at the London show on Saturday-now if he was only dressed in buckskins and not carrying that darn saber
Got to get this thread back on track somehow
Reb
No, but I used to read them all the time as a kid. Good old tough as nails Sgt Rock.Are you another Rock head? One of the great war comics of its day.. I still collect certain titles ( mostly horror, but I do have the entire NAM series ) I have thought about getting Rock back issues, but my trains and soldiers are taking up all the free space..Michael
Surely little things like a saber and blues will not stand in your way Bob? We have all seen those fabulous modifications in your stories.Picked this guy up at the London show on Saturday-now if he was only dressed in buckskins and not carrying that darn saber
Got to get this thread back on track somehow
Reb
With Rebs or Indians John????
Reb
Okay would you call it ironic, that the only guy that made a move to save Custer, Weir is rumored to have had an affair with Custer's wife?
Okay then, how about a guy who was convicted of treason and sentenced to death, the sentence was later commuted was the only guy to carry a saber on the field at the Little Big Horn?
Nice, who makes him?
Okay would you call it ironic, that the only guy that made a move to save Custer, Weir is rumored to have had an affair with Custer's wife?
Indeed it was De Rudio.That might be De Rudio, who was convicted in an assasination plot to kill Emperor Louis Napoleon. Not sure about the Weir / Libbie stuff..Michael
Sounds like the rumors worried Custer a little bit.Weir after serving in the war where he was breveted a lieutenant colonel was appointed to the newly formed 7th Cavalry in 1867 as a first lieutenant and quickly promoted to captain. During the Hancock campaign he remained in Fort Hayes where his relationship with Libbie Custer most probably came under scrutiny. Weir served as Libbie's escort in Custer's absence-a normal practice for officers at frontier posts-rumours circulated that the two were an item and no doubt is why Custer left his command in the field and made his mad-dash across Kansas which resulted in his court martial.(worth noting here that the rumours were perpetuated by no other than our old friend Benteen-he surely hated the Custers)
After the LBH, Weir wrote to Libbie Custer, (a woman who he probably did love as did a number of officers in the 7th-she was an extremely attractive woman with deep auburn hair and always dressed very chic) stating that he would completely vindicate accusations against Custer. But before he could get to her with whatever information he perceived as being relevant he died-he was in the advance stages of alcoholism and suffered congestion of the brain in December 1876 whilst on recruiting duties in New York.
Numerous references to Weir's relationship with the Custers can be found in umpteen books such as Elizabeth Bacon Custer and the Making of a Myth but no verifiable supporting evidence exists to indicate that Libbie engaged in anything more than a flirtatious interest in Weir.
My take on this story is- pure "Benteen bile" and my evidence- Libbie Custer most definitely was no advocate of the "Devil's Brew" (and Weir was indeed a drinking man) which is why Custer gave up his hooch when they became engaged-never again did a drop pass his lips!
Reb
History has caught up with G A Custer,Civil war hero he may have been ,Indian Fighter he was not.He was taking an active part in the then US Govenments military solution to the indian problem,known now as genocide or ethnic cleansing.To call this man a hero is a disgrace and an insult to the memory of all the american indians who were physically destroyed and or removed from their land by force by white men who had betrayed their agreements with the indians.Custers morality is clearly questionable even in his time,so to say he was a man of his time,is no defense for his despicable moral decisions.He was clearly vain glorious and a military incompetant who took great pleasure in killing non combatants and met his rightful end in a skirmish that he could have prevented if he had demonstrated any tactical knowledge which he clearly lacked.History has withered away the veil of martyrdom of Custer and replaced it with the darker sinister veil of the morally corrupt individual who met his end whilst in pursuit of the annihilation of a fellow race of human beings.
Bromhead ,this thread was about Custer and The Little Big Horn,so perhaps you should start a thread about allied airmen of ww2 and i will give you a historical perpsective on that as well,but how you can compare allied airmen and Custers part in attempted genocide is beyond reason.
Ah we seem to be slipping toward a well traveled road. With the greatest respect, I must demur to the notion that what I consider reprehensible or unthinkable, including certain actions in Sherman's march, reconstruction or the "pacification" of the American Indian should be considered anything else but reprehensible by any standard of civilization since the Middle Ages. Just because many such actions fail by such criteria does not mean they should be excused by the whatever popular sentiment may have encouraged or even celebrated them.Gentlemen, it is no use looking back at history with modern ideals, times and mindset were different then. What is unthinkable and reprehensible today was considered to be the logical answer at that time. As we progress we hopefully learn from the mistakes of the past and do not repeat them. But it must be remembered that the actions of the day were governed by the thoughts of that day. In years to come our activities will be evaluated and no doubt many will be ridiculed and some will cause open mouthed shock and horror to our descendants. The same applies to our view of the past, try to look back with impartiality.
History has caught up with G A Custer,Civil war hero he may have been ,Indian Fighter he was not.He was taking an active part in the then US Govenments military solution to the indian problem,known now as genocide or ethnic cleansing.To call this man a hero is a disgrace and an insult to the memory of all the american indians who were physically destroyed and or removed from their land by force by white men who had betrayed their agreements with the indians.Custers morality is clearly questionable even in his time,so to say he was a man of his time,is no defense for his despicable moral decisions.He was clearly vain glorious and a military incompetant who took great pleasure in killing non combatants and met his rightful end in a skirmish that he could have prevented if he had demonstrated any tactical knowledge which he clearly lacked.History has withered away the veil of martyrdom of Custer and replaced it with the darker sinister veil of the morally corrupt individual who met his end whilst in pursuit of the annihilation of a fellow race of human beings.
Well said Michael. -- AlI love it when a foreign gentleman, whose country's long and massive colonial policy, historically has shown us newcomers the way to racism and genocide of entire independent countries, on a regular historical basis, can come here and rag on our history and it's participants. You do not find us ,trashing your countries historical leaders ( Chemsford, Bartle-Frere, Cromwell, any of your WW1 Generals, most of your Kings..)with the same attitude that you display. Past history and its events must be discussed in the vacuum of its time and perceptions. As an american, I take offense at your opinion in this matter and suggest you start a thread on the modern perspective to the total destruction of the African continent and its people by England. See how far our Zulu War and Sudan War buffs let you get away with it....Michael