Spitfrnd
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,923
I agree with you mate. As one of the ones who was over there for some of that time, I think those movies reflected the attitude of many (if not most) of us who served during those divisive times. Homage, hey I just wanted it to end. For that reason, I really have little taste for movies about Vietnam. Maybe it is axiomatic that you don't care for movies about the war you were in; or maybe that's only true if you thought the war was a really bad idea.I thought Apocalypse Now was great until the Marlo Brando parts towards the end. The travel to the heart of darkness was very well done but when they got there, it seemed to suffer. Perhaps Coppola didn't know how to finish it off.
You know, I hear this about not paying homage to the people who served but that wasn't the time when these films were made so you're expecting too much. You had to live through that time (I was a teenager in the 60s) to understand it; I think some of those saying it were probably just being born in that decade As a result, you have films like Apocalypse Now and the Deer Hunter. These are great movies and reflected -- and I think they did although others may disagree -- the attitude of the time. We can't impose today's attitude on films made back in the late 60s or early 70s. This was a time of doubting society, changing things (for better or for worse), instability in our culture and cynicism towards politicians which, considering Watergate, might have been justified. As the Byrds said, "the times, they are a changing."
I didn't like the ending of Apocalypse now either or the very strange beginning. There were some classic scenes in the middle but I think overall it was a disappointment.