Creating the Battle of the Bulge.....Wacht Am Rhine (3 Viewers)

This is the discussion I would like to have - the Lee Enfield was thought to be machine guns at Mons in WW1 so that can't be the answer can it? Was it so different from the American rifle? The Germans had the MP40, MG34/42 and later the assault rifle, the russians changed much of their troops to their SMG.

The Brit section had a 3 man bren group, two with rifles, lead by a lance corporal as the heart of it, plus six rifle armed squaddies and a sten gun armed corporal section leader. All the men carried the same .303" ammo and bren magazines.

The Germans had semi/automatic weapons and rifles in their squads plus an MG42 more like the British, plus integral panzerfaust?I have not managed to find a detailed reference of US Army squad equivalent yet, but thought it was rifle armed and a BAR?

A British Battalion was composed of four rifle companies - 360 men in 12 platoons (30 men?). Each platoon had the sections outlined above plus a PIAT and 2" mortar.

In each battalion there were a further 340 men in supporting and service units. The battalion support company, in 13 bren carriers, provided much of its punch, with Vickers MGs, a 3" mortar platoon with 6 mortars and 6x6pdr AT guns in its AT platoon.

All I could find about the US battalion was that it had 3 rifle companies (cf4), each of three platoons of 36 men (?larger squads but no LMG) with a support company - ? 30 cal MGs and 60mm mortars?

If - and I say 'if' as reported - the US troops were 'borrowing' Thompson SMGs and the like, they must have felt the strain in a firefight? I am no expert in this area - Can anyone help with this discussion???????

Well, OK, I'll give it my thoughts. Whilst never having served in the military, I have had the oportunity to fire plenty of different firearms, both socially and at work (both at bits of paper and wood you understand, I don't make a habit of popping off rounds in the High Street when boredom sets in), so please take my thoughts from someone who has had the luxury of shooting without being shot at.

I have fired the Lee Enfield on a number of occasions, but not the Garand. I have however fired a ot of other rifles, both bolt action and semi automatic and I find the process of firing a bolt action rifle, removing my hand to cycle a new round, getting back on the trigger, aiming and firing, far more time consuming, than with a semi automatic rifle, where I fire, aim, and fire again.

I would therefore say, that the accurate rate of fire with the Garand should be far greater than the Lee Enfield (fine rifle though it is).

As for the Thompson, or any SMG using a pistol round, surely great for close quater work, but a bit of a b***er, if you're trying to shoot at an enemy rifleman a couple hundered yards away, and by the time you've got the rounds going more or less in the direction you want them, you've emptied a 20 or 30 round magazine.

I don't know if the idea for arming with an SMG appealed to the troops at the time, perhaps one of the military / ex-military members could chip in.

Something I've noted is that if you look at all of the D-Day photos of US soldiers, you tend to see plenty of Garands, M1 Carbines, BARs etc and very few SMGs. Presumably, all of these troops would have started off with pretty much a 'clean sheet' of arms and equipment, due to being refitted prior to the invasion. Then if you look at photos of the troops in late 44, early 45, there seems to be a far greater spread of SMGs. I can only presume, that they were popular with the troops, and so replaced their rifles with sub machine guns, as and when the oportunity arose.

Any thoughts from others?

Simon
 
Is this the right thread for a firearms arguement :p Maybe we will need a separate one for this.

Anyway, I have fired several semi auto weapons as well as several Lee Enfield variants but haven't fired an M1 Garand as yet. Despite my old age I haven't experienced any incoming apart from air rifle and paintball pellets, which both sting I can tell you, but are rarely fatal :D

However having read a good deal on these matters over the years I would say that the Lee Enfield is more accurate than the Garand. And you would be surprised how many accurate shots you can get away with a bolt action rifle after some practice. That said I have always prefered a semi auto when a large pig is coming towards me and I guess I would also prefer a semi auto in a combat situation.

So for ranges over 200 yards I'd rather have the Lee Enfield. But when it hit the fan up close I'd rather have an M1. However the loud KATCHING when the M1's ammo clip flies away telling the enemy I'm out of ammo would be a real bummer imo :eek:
 
The German Volksgrenadiers keep moving.........

IMG_0084red2.jpg

IMG_0087red.jpg

with armour support..............

IMG_6298red.jpg

and mobile artillery

IMG_1003a_1red.jpg
 
Combat Command Reserve CCR of 7th US Armoured Division were on their way to try to reinforce the 106th Division............................
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0455red.jpg
    IMG_0455red.jpg
    83.9 KB · Views: 131
  • IMG_0451red.jpg
    IMG_0451red.jpg
    85.1 KB · Views: 128
Panda great pics, you have a fine collection. I am always amazed at your pics.:)
 
Wasn't it something like "The St Winifred's School Choir"..?? I distinctly remember seeing them appear on Top of the Pops - late 70's/early 80's.
Wonder if it stumped UK Reb - at last....:D:D

Cheers
Heid

I'm only a poor little sparrow
No colourful feathers have I
I can't even sing
When I'm nesting in spring
And the turnips don't grow very high.

Originally recorded by The Ramblers. The St Winifred "Warblers" just did a cover of it.
Come on Harry you'll have to do better than that!
But it's only fair to tell you, if you ask my local quiz team why they have me on their team I think they'll say Military History, Hollywood and Music but for God's sake don't ever ask him one on Sport!

Reb
 
I'm only a poor little sparrow
No colourful feathers have I
I can't even sing
When I'm nesting in spring
And the turnips don't grow very high.

Originally recorded by The Ramblers. The St Winifred "Warblers" just did a cover of it.
Come on Harry you'll have to do better than that!
But it's only fair to tell you, if you ask my local quiz team why they have me on their team I think they'll say Military History, Hollywood and Music but for God's sake don't ever ask him one on Sport!

Reb

I'm gob-smacked Reb. Utterly amazed in fact. :eek: I'm not worthy, I'm not worthy.....
Yeah, I'm pretty good at pub quizzes as well. I was in a team in the China Beach Bar in Shekou South China a few years ago and my team won the tie-break for 1st place cos I managed to identify Jack Bruce in a 10 second film clip. What made it all the sweeter was that we beat The Bristows Helicopter Pilots Team - who thought they were "Erchie" (Scottish expression - means they were full of themselves). Mind you, it should never have gone to a tie-break, cos unknown to anyone else, WE WERE MARKING OUR OWN ANSWERS......:D:D
What really puzzled me though was despite our blatant cheating - we still only averaged 5 correct answers out of 12 per round.....??? :eek::eek:

Okay, I'll have to come up with a "brammer" this next time.

Cheers Mate
H
 
Harry - no idea again mate but it sounds a bit like Bob Dylan - am I even warm?
 
Receiving - over.

Heidi, I've told you before not to call me at work:eek:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0086red1.jpg
    IMG_0086red1.jpg
    95.4 KB · Views: 121
Harry

I.......wish.....I knew this one


Reb

Nope, I don't accept that Reb.
Try a certain bone you get from a chicken and combine it with a type of tree for the band's name. :):)

If its any help, another song off the same album is;
"I have to be a warrior, a slave I could've been"
"A soldier and a conquerer, trying to be free"

Very early 1970's

Sorry to hijack your thread Kevin. Will move this over to the misc section if its a PITA.
Cheers
H
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top