First Legion: PanzerIII (3 Viewers)

The AFVs and figures are 1:30. The K&C, Figarti, and TGM figures are larger than 1:30

Terry

Thanks for posting this , its certainly tiring to hear the same old bad information being repeated Ad nauseam . Maybe people should say I wish such and such would shrink their stuff down to 1/30 .....All the best Gebhard
 
The information on size is here, it is just buried at this point. It is a pity to have to restate the same corrections to popular misconceptions. In my Blu-ray forum, they would make things like that a sticky so it was always on top.
 
First Legion is at least consistent in scale in both AFV's and soldiers...and.....I believe they are quite accurate and very close to 1:30th scale......BUT..... what is best about FL is the "consistency/focus" within the Stalingrad Line.....K/C and Figarti are a bit larger than 1:30 scale IMO especially the figures.....To me however scale is not an issue as long as products work well together and maintain "their" scale and style.........K/C and Figarti work fairly well together but DO NOT with First Legion products.........First Legion "stands alone" in both scale,style and realism. Also First legion is "un-matched" in realism for diorama set up.....This has been my observation....There is NO NEED for First Legion to change there product line to match other manufacturers products since they are aleady producing the "most realistic products out there". Those of us who collect FL do so because they offer a "unique product"...of un-matched quality....Again consistency in scale is the most inportant issue within the manufacturers line.
 
First Legion is at least consistent in scale in both AFV's and soldiers...and.....I believe they are quite accurate and very close to 1:30th scale......BUT..... what is best about FL is the "consistency/focus" within the Stalingrad Line.....K/C and Figarti are a bit larger than 1:30 scale IMO especially the figures.....To me however scale is not an issue as long as products work well together and maintain "their" scale and style.........K/C and Figarti work fairly well together but DO NOT with First Legion products.........First Legion "stands alone" in both scale,style and realism. Also First legion is "un-matched" in realism for diorama set up.....This has been my observation....There is NO NEED for First Legion to change there product line to match other manufacturers products since they are aleady producing the "most realistic products out there". Those of us who collect FL do so because they offer a "unique product"...of un-matched quality....Again consistency in scale is the most inportant issue within the manufacturers line.

That's not why I collect FL NAPs :)

Terry
 
Gebhard...

Same old bad information etc etc. Good reply. it was my understanding that the products were 1.32nd scale all the literature I have seen from this manufacturer to date states this scale. So, maybe the company should clarify this then the same old may not be repeated and bore some so much. As I said this is why I have steered away from this manufacturer in the past.
Mitch

Thanks for posting this , its certainly tiring to hear the same old bad information being repeated Ad nauseam . Maybe people should say I wish such and such would shrink their stuff down to 1/30 .....All the best Gebhard
 
First Legion is at least consistent in scale in both AFV's and soldiers...and.....I believe they are quite accurate and very close to 1:30th scale......BUT..... what is best about FL is the "consistency/focus" within the Stalingrad Line.....K/C and Figarti are a bit larger than 1:30 scale IMO especially the figures.....To me however scale is not an issue as long as products work well together and maintain "their" scale and style.........K/C and Figarti work fairly well together but DO NOT with First Legion products.........First Legion "stands alone" in both scale,style and realism. Also First legion is "un-matched" in realism for diorama set up.....This has been my observation....There is NO NEED for First Legion to change there product line to match other manufacturers products since they are aleady producing the "most realistic products out there". Those of us who collect FL do so because they offer a "unique product"...of un-matched quality....Again consistency in scale is the most inportant issue within the manufacturers line.
I certainly agree with you mate with my off noted caveat that there are some cavalry figures from K&C that do fit pretty well with FL. That said, I do agree that FL figures are intended for and do deliver consistancy within the line and the comprehensiveness of thier releases obviates the need to suppliment them from outside sources.
 
Gebhard...

Same old bad information etc etc. Good reply. it was my understanding that the products were 1.32nd scale all the literature I have seen from this manufacturer to date states this scale. So, maybe the company should clarify this then the same old may not be repeated and bore some so much. As I said this is why I have steered away from this manufacturer in the past.
Mitch
I am not sure what literature you are referencing but it is not the most current for quite a long while now. I would take a look at the scale discussion page on the FL website which notes:

First Legion's 54mm Napoleon's Europe toy soldiers are marketed or branded as "54mm", though in fact they are a bit larger than this or true "1/30th" scale. We previously had a long text description discussing the size, however, as a picture is worth a thousand words we've removed that and replaced it with this image showing the figures next to a tape measure. As can be seen, they are clearly taller than 54mm, with an average height of about 58mm sole to eye or 60mm from the sole to the tops of the heads. Note, the measurement is taken from the top of the figure base.

There is much confusion and inconsistency in measuring scale and figures but as I have noted in too many scale posts and examples here, they measure on average, 58 to 60mm sole to head, which translates into 1/30 scale at an average person height of 5ft, 9-10". It is not their fault that some other manufacturers have labeled their figures at smaller scale than they really are. Thus whether you buy them or not is your choice but the failure to describe their scale corrrectly seems hardly a fair one. In any event, the correction is to either see and compare them at a show or buy one to compare yourself. I did that with several companies when I first started and you can just sell off the ones you do not pursue.:)
 
I am not sure what literature you are referencing but it is not the most current for quite a long while now. I would take a look at the scale discussion page on the FL website which notes:

First Legion's 54mm Napoleon's Europe toy soldiers are marketed or branded as "54mm", though in fact they are a bit larger than this or true "1/30th" scale. We previously had a long text description discussing the size, however, as a picture is worth a thousand words we've removed that and replaced it with this image showing the figures next to a tape measure. As can be seen, they are clearly taller than 54mm, with an average height of about 58mm sole to eye or 60mm from the sole to the tops of the heads. Note, the measurement is taken from the top of the figure base.

There is much confusion and inconsistency in measuring scale and figures but as I have noted in too many scale posts and examples here, they measure on average, 58 to 60mm sole to head, which translates into 1/30 scale at an average person height of 5ft, 9-10". It is not their fault that some other manufacturers have labeled their figures at smaller scale than they really are. Thus whether you buy them or not is your choice but the failure to describe their scale corrrectly seems hardly a fair one. In any event, the correction is to either see and compare them at a show or buy one to compare yourself. I did that with several companies when I first started and you can just sell off the ones you do not pursue.:)

In the final analysis, they need to be compared side-by-side, regardless of what the manufacture calls the sizing be it in mm or by scale. There are some photos on the FL threads comparing the FL Minutemen with K&C Minutemen and they are not the same. There must be some comparison photos of the NAPS here too.

Terry
 
Spitfrnd...

Thanks for the more mature response rather than what I recieved from other posters. I must clarify for those who seem quite defensive and tetchy towards critique. The information I have seen including many advertisments and the FL website state 54mm which, to me, as a modeller, is smaller than most manufacturers and, nearer to 1/32nd IMO.

I have stated on here that I have bought Samurai as they are good but, are smaller IMO and fact than some of my other figures and, thus, this was the crux to my comment about scale and, why I have steered away from the WWII ranges even though they look good.

Always nice as a new poster to get information about such issues rather than defensive replies as I do not go to shows etc I was unaware of visual scale compared to other WWII ranges from other manufacturers
Mitch


I am not sure what literature you are referencing but it is not the most current for quite a long while now. I would take a look at the scale discussion page on the FL website which notes:

First Legion's 54mm Napoleon's Europe toy soldiers are marketed or branded as "54mm", though in fact they are a bit larger than this or true "1/30th" scale. We previously had a long text description discussing the size, however, as a picture is worth a thousand words we've removed that and replaced it with this image showing the figures next to a tape measure. As can be seen, they are clearly taller than 54mm, with an average height of about 58mm sole to eye or 60mm from the sole to the tops of the heads. Note, the measurement is taken from the top of the figure base.

There is much confusion and inconsistency in measuring scale and figures but as I have noted in too many scale posts and examples here, they measure on average, 58 to 60mm sole to head, which translates into 1/30 scale at an average person height of 5ft, 9-10". It is not their fault that some other manufacturers have labeled their figures at smaller scale than they really are. Thus whether you buy them or not is your choice but the failure to describe their scale corrrectly seems hardly a fair one. In any event, the correction is to either see and compare them at a show or buy one to compare yourself. I did that with several companies when I first started and you can just sell off the ones you do not pursue.:)
 
Gebhard...

Same old bad information etc etc. Good reply. it was my understanding that the products were 1.32nd scale all the literature I have seen from this manufacturer to date states this scale. So, maybe the company should clarify this then the same old may not be repeated and bore some so much. As I said this is why I have steered away from this manufacturer in the past.
Mitch

Mitch ,
Please see Bills reply , I think he answered your concern very well . I've really nothing to add but will post a link for you http://www.firstlegionltd.com/scale.aspx . I'm sure you will see that First legion are very clear on this issue . Happy collecting no matter in what direction your steering . Gebhard
 
The information on size is here, it is just buried at this point. It is a pity to have to restate the same corrections to popular misconceptions. In my Blu-ray forum, they would make things like that a sticky so it was always on top.

That's a very good point Bill :) Would save a lot of time , as it seems some new posters have not read these discussions the first or second ect..time that they have been brought up. Its also on the FL web site and not that hard to find . G
 
Gebhard et al...

Thanks for the link however, this was what I was stating with my comment and, they for me, are not mixable with other makers and, are 54mm which, was always nearer 1/32nd than not. This was my point about their armour which, was scorned when it was a valid response. They are a lot of money IMO to start a new collection which, you cannot cross match with others realistically. Its the debate about using FOV with K&C figures for me, you just cannot. Anyway, as this has gone far away from what I meant when I posted it we shall best leave it.
Mitch
Mitch ,
Please see Bills reply , I think he answered your concern very well . I've really nothing to add but will post a link for you http://www.firstlegionltd.com/scale.aspx . I'm sure you will see that First legion are very clear on this issue . Happy collecting no matter in what direction your steering . Gebhard
 
The recent FL, K&C, Figarti and HB armour are all 1:30 scale and also are the same size - no variance by manufacturer. The figures do show a lot of variation. Here is a link to 4 photos of my British Empire collection which has figures from several manufacturers, and you can see for yourself the variation in size and style, but IMO they still look good on a shelf together as a collection.:)

http://www.treefrogtreasures.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22503

Terry
 
Phantom Warrior...

Do you have any pics of FL armour with others? I would like to see some side by side shots
Mitch

The recent FL, K&C, Figarti and HB armour are all 1:30 scale and also are the same size - no variance by manufacturer. The figures do show a lot of variation. Here is a link to 4 photos of my British Empire collection which has figures from several manufacturers, and you can see for yourself the variation in size and style, but IMO they still look good on a shelf together as a collection.:)

http://www.treefrogtreasures.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22503

Terry
 
Phantom Warrior...

Do you have any pics of FL armour with others? I would like to see some side by side shots
Mitch

I don't have any FL armour and with only a few pieces made so far, the only comparison I can think of is the Pazer III with the recent K&C release and the Stug with the CS Stug. I think the early K&C Stugs were smaller. So there is very little overlap of models. My favourite is the desert version Rad-8.

Where the size difference comes in, is with the figures. The FL figures are in sync with the 1:30 AFVs but the Figarti and K&C figures are robust.

I think Nasirkasmani posted some comparison photos when the first FL stug came out

Terry
 
Gebhard et al...

Thanks for the link however, this was what I was stating with my comment and, they for me, are not mixable with other makers and, are 54mm which, was always nearer 1/32nd than not. This was my point about their armour which, was scorned when it was a valid response. They are a lot of money IMO to start a new collection which, you cannot cross match with others realistically. Its the debate about using FOV with K&C figures for me, you just cannot. Anyway, as this has gone far away from what I meant when I posted it we shall best leave it.
Mitch
I certainly understand your concern and if I had a large collection of other figures for a given period that is something that would give me something to consider. Somewhere here, I have posted some side by side Napoleonic pictures for K&C, Britains, CS and FL but I have been told the WWII lines of the some of these manufactuers are somewhat differently sized. Because of size and style, I haven't mixed any K&C foot Napoleonics side by side with FL but have done it with some of their relatively smalller cavalry. Britains and FL figures are nearly identical in size and I have mixed in a number of those here and there. Putting aside style, I think you can also mix K&C and FL foot figures if you keep them in discrete groups, like K&C Brits facing FL French, with some space between. CS figures are a different size than any of the above and sorta mix with either from my experience.

I think the confusion with 54 mm comes from one of the figure size conventions of measuring from sole to eyes, which we have talked about in scale discussions here. The FL figures measure around 54 - 58 mm to the eyes so describing them as 54 mm would conform to that convention, which does appear to have a relatively significant following. They also measure about 4 mm from chin to eye and one constant you can rely on is that the human eyes are set almost perfectly in the middle of the head. Thus a 54 mm sole to eye measurement is 58 mm to the tip of head and 56 mm sole to eye is 60 mm sole to top of head.

I got so crazy about all this sometime back that I bought my own digital calipher so I would be able to know precisely what the actual measurements were for items of interest to me. Of course, having done that, I found that even the large variations between the shortest Napoleonic figures I measured, CS, and the largest, K&C, were less than 8 mm, which for a 58 mm starting point, would be a difference of less than 13%. Interestingly that is well within the range of heights one may expect from even military personel but that much of a difference (and sometimes less) just doesn't look quite right to me. Part of it has to do more with the consistency of proportions and weapons within each figure and part is just what the eye finds "comfortable" I suspect. Bottom line, all our lives would be easier if manufacuer all used the same standard sizes but that simply does not seem to be the case so you mix what looks right and seperate what doesn't.;)
 
Gebhard...

Same old bad information etc etc. Good reply. it was my understanding that the products were 1.32nd scale all the literature I have seen from this manufacturer to date states this scale. So, maybe the company should clarify this then the same old may not be repeated and bore some so much. As I said this is why I have steered away from this manufacturer in the past.
Mitch

Mitch, Once you try First Legion Stalingrad you will not be so concerned about the scale of other manufacturers....You will love this product; these WWII soldiers are incredibly realistic....1:30 scale or not or whatever.....Nothing even comes close to FL for diorama buffs.....Just give them a try:)....The Panzer III is quite possibly the best version of this tank ever produced.....and it definitely 1:30 scale
 
I was in your shoes couple of months ago. I have tons of K&C WWII and napoleonic figures. I don't mix my FL and K&C naps not because of a size issue but more because I consider my FL figures the best in my collection so I like to display those separately. Colors of K&C are also too bright and don't mix well (for me) with the delicate shadings of FL figures.

Alex.
 
Vezzolf....

Have never doubted the quality its very appealing was just concerned over scale as stated yesterday. I especially like the Winter versions. I like to have at least one thing from each manufacturer that I like and, for me, the Samurai was to be the collection from FL. I just may have to buy one, notwithstanding that I am not a fan of the figure or the missing drum magazine.

They do produce great stuff and can see why people are impressed.
Mitch

Mitch, Once you try First Legion Stalingrad you will not be so concerned about the scale of other manufacturers....You will love this product; these WWII soldiers are incredibly realistic....1:30 scale or not or whatever.....Nothing even comes close to FL for diorama buffs.....Just give them a try:)....The Panzer III is quite possibly the best version of this tank ever produced.....and it definitely 1:30 scale
 
Vezzolf....

the missing drum magazine.

They do produce great stuff and can see why people are impressed.
Mitch

Was it procedure to have one of the 50 round drum mags mounted to a machine gun that was not being used ? :confused: I've never been a crewman before but I would think that the ammo for this gun would be stowed safely inside with the rest of the Ammunition until needed . If the crewman figure was posed in a firing position then I would be right with ya saying Matt were is the ammo , But I don't think that is the case . About the figure I guess that's a matter of taste some will like it some won't . I think he is accurately rendered right down to the most beloved Toque ... but to each his own ;) Happy collecting Gebhard
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top