K&C are all 1/30 except the warbirds JPB
No - they´re not! The Crusader Series are 1/32 - only the crossbow guy from Collectors Club are 1/30!![]()
No - they´re not! The Crusader Series are 1/32 - only the crossbow guy from Collectors Club are 1/30!![]()
No - they´re not! The Crusader Series are 1/32 - only the crossbow guy from Collectors Club are 1/30!![]()
To me it is confusing to use the ratio reference (1/32, 1/30 etc) for figure scales. As we have discussed before here, that only works well when you have a definitive full sized example, as in vehicles and aircraft. Figures represent people and their sizes can vary easily by more than 20 percent; much more than the difference between 1/30 and 1/32. For figures it is much more helpful to use the actual figure height from sole to eyes or sole to tip of head values, usually expressed in mm. I favor sole to top of head (disregarding headgear) which for the K&C Naps I have is from 58-60mm. I have no Crusaders or Saracens but looking at the TreeFrog size photo for one Saracen I see about 63mm from bottom of base to tip of where the head would be without the covering; subtracting what seems to be 3mm for the base this would indicate a 60mm figure. http://www.treefrogtreasures.com/detail.aspx?ID=1934I totally agree. The crusader series is 1/32. Their design (ie the scaling ladders and the seige tower) fits perfectly with JG Miniatures structures which are also 1/32 scale. They also compare favorably in scale with St. Petersburg Collection Crusaders which are also 1/32.
Mike
Good information Ken but for figures especially I think the concern is more how they fit together than what ratio to full size they represent. I would also offer that my limited experience suggests that few manufacturers are consistent with their use of scale and while one weapon might be 1/32, another might be 1/30 and the figure yet another scale, depending on what you chose for the size of the real person they represent. I think you can see definite examples of that in the comparative WWII photo I posted below. Consider for example the very large difference in weapon sizes between figures 5 and 6, yet 5 is said to be 1/32 and 6 is said to be 1/30.Hello All!
This seems to be a confusing subject for all of us but I really need to revisit something I have stated before...
You are all correct that people come in different sizes and that is not the question or concern. As a designer, sculptor and modelmaker the most important thing to consider when making a scale reduction of people, environments and the material culture of any period, it is the scale of man made items that remain constant.
When you look at a miniature take some item like a weapon that was only made in one size. If you have any interest at all most of this information is now on the web somewhere.
An example would be a Brown Bess. The one here by my bench is a New Land (2nd Model) and it measures 58 1/4" from muzzle to butt plate. If I model a man at 5 " 9" or 6' 3"... the Musket will still be 58 1/4" long.
In 1/32 scale this would be 1.82" long or in 1/30 scale 1.94" long.
Remember this:
In 1/32 scale a foot is 3/8 of an inch in length
In 1/30 scale a foot is 13/32 of an inch in length
...or a foot in 1/30 scale is 1/32 of an inch longer than a foot in 1/32 scale.
As an item gets larger then the differences become greater.
Another example might be the width of a WWII German Panther tank (Panzerkamfwagen V Ausf.A SdKfz 17).
In full size it measured 3.42 meters wide
In English measurement this is 11' 2 5/8" wide
In 1/32 scale this is 4 3/16"
In 1/30 scale this is 4 1/2"
This would be a 5/16" difference in width.
In the end if you wonder about the scale of your collectible, find something that is a fixed size in real life and convert it to the scale you think it should be.
Good luck and have fun!
Ken
I am not sure scale is perfectly consistent even within product lines and I am certain that it is not between various lines. I am most certain that the use of ratio scales is vastly inconsistent. Consider again numbers 5 and 6 from that photo I posted. Both soldiers seem to be using M1s, which should measure 43.6 inches at full scale or 1.4533 at 1/30 and 1.3625 at 1/32. The difference in the rifles for those two figures appears much more than .091 inches (2.3 mm) as suggested by the claimed scale for each. Since I don't have either, I can't say which ratio scale claim is more accurate.From my position as a professional sculptor and modelmaker I think it is important to have a standard within a range. I think most of the manufacturers do that already and as a result it really isn't a problem for most folks if you stay with one manufacturers product.
The point I was making was for those interested in mixing different figures from various manufacturers.
The best starting place to make a decision if the other product will be compatible with your existing collection, will always be using some item that will have a fixed measurement in real world.
If a WWII German soldier should have a M31 Gas Mask canister, I cannot accept that it is two grossly different sizes within the same scale. I can accept that the figure is 1/16" taller or shorter within the same scale.
The answer is to actually see what you are looking at and then quantify it within a standard. If you do not do this and then move into vehicle and equipment additions to your collection then you may be disappointed at the end of the day if you are at all concerned about your miniatures accurately representing real world items.
I hope this helps, all the best!
Ken
There seems to be a scale difference in AWI as well. The latest Brits are much smaller/leaner than the older Americans and the Highlanders I have from that range. Anyone else see that difference that have these figures?
There you go with that ratio again.OLD is AR 04 - it is about a 1/32 Figure
NEW is AR 38 - it is around 1/30 Figure
Well so do I. What I was hoping you would do was post a comparative photo with them lined up next to each other, kinda consistent with my theme below. The more photo comparisons we have the better.OK - How about AR05 is smaller - more standard - than AR38 !
I never really liked the AR 30's - because they could only go with the old british highlanders which are the same size as them - not the new british line troops that K&C came out with a couple of years ago.
I look forward to more uniformity in troop size.![]()