Here is my two cents and if I offend anyone such as Louis, Hans, Larry and Kevin in so saying, you have my sincerest apologies.
Book Text. Louis has on occasion provided sections of the book with respect to a particular figure. I think it might be possible to cut down the cost if you cut down the text and I think it's more than really necessary. I think what collectors are looking for what is the figure, what is the figure set number and the date first issued. That is what I use the brochures for. If the way the book has been drafted is the way it's been done with other like books, then I withdraw the comment. I had offered my services to help with the editing since as a contracts attorney that's what I do all day long and I believe I'm a pretty good writer. My offer was not taken up but the offer still stands if the authors would like me to help out.
Photos. Kevin's photos are amazing as I helped one day with setting things up for his photoraphy. However, many of them are dioramalike and I'm not sure if that works with a book like this where collectors probably just want, as mentioned above, set name, set number and date of issuance. I think what may be best is how they appear in the brochures: just the photo of the set. Perhaps the photos in the brochures can be used for the book, with Andy's permission.
Again, if I have offended anybody, you have my sincerest apologies as my only intent is to see the book published.
Gentle Friends,
Speaking as a collector who is not yet totally addicted to King and Country and as one who prizes diversity, I think some of Brad's comments make sense to me. I had planned to purchase this book for my library. While diorama like photographs are stunning, I could easily give up that feature in the book. Also, my primary interest in the book is to use it as a research tool. I am less interested in the history of the King and Country Company and more interested in data. Parallelling Brad's comments, I have listed below the information I believe I would find useful:
Separate pictures of each set issued.
Set name of each set.
Set number of each set.
Where possible dates of issue and dates of retirement.
Where possible, production numbers of each set.
Where possible, retail cost at the time of issue.
An indication of gloss or matte finish.
I believe a short, objective introductory chapter on the history of King and County is appropriate and useful. However, too much time and space devoted to complimenting the company and its products, discussing personal relationships, praising creativity, focusing on the company's industry leadership, etc., etc. is both expensive and unnecessary and, consequently, not particularly useful to the average collector.
Like Brad, I mean no offense to anyone. The above is only an honest description of what I consider to be the primary information I would find useful in such a publication. I hope some relatively practical means of presenting this information to the toy soldiering public is identified.
Warmest personal regards,
Pat