From the ridiculous to the sublime:
On ESPN Mike Mazzeo and Rich Cimini are debating whether Eli Manning is better than Peyton Manning. Look, I am a huge Giants fan, and Eli has carried the team this season, but are they serious? Peyton has not played well in the post season (he is 9-10, 1-1 in Superbowls, and his statistics are way down from the regular season) but he is arguably one of the top 5 quarterbacks of all time. Eli is arguable one of the top 5 quarterbacks playing this season, but he is not even in the top 25 all time.
That being said, ask me again in three weeks. If (and its a big if, as much as I have confidence, the 49ers, Ravens or Patriots are all tough teams that could beat the Giants on any given Sunday) he wins a second Superbowl (especially if he beats Tom Brady, another one of the top 5 QB's of all time, for a second time) he becomes only the 11th starting QB in league history to hoist the Lombardy Trophy more than once (Bart Star, Bob Griese, Terry Bradshaw, Roger Stauback, Jim Plunkett, Joe Montana, Troy Aikman, John Elway, Tom Brady, Ben Roesthlisberger) - a club Peyton is not a member of - and has an 8-3 playoff mark, the argument can be made that Eli is better because it took Peyton Manning 9 NFL seasons to win his first Superbowl, while Eli won two in his first 8 seasons.
I however, would not make it. If Eli keeps playing like he did this season for the remainder of his career, and plays as long as Peyton has played, and keeps up his iron man record (now that Peyton missed a season with injuries, Eli is the reigning NFL iron man with 174 consecutive starts), and at some point along the way wins at least 1 MVP, and plays in and wins at least one more Superbowl, then, and only then would I elevate him to Peyton's status. That being said, at the end of the day, as a fan, I would rather have a QB with 2 Superbowl wins than a QB with only 1 ring and all the fancy regular season stats in the world.