Combat
Brigadier General
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
- Messages
- 10,292
As the story indicates, they're still free to use the name. They just will not be entitled to the protections that come with an actual registration. You still have Common Law protections.
They need to find some Norwegians to claim that the Viking mascot stereotypes blond haired Scandinavians as prone to violence. I disagree with this decision. It may very well be offensive but it is not up to the government to make that determination. This is different from the flag issue in that it relates to decisions made by private businesses to display or use an offensive name and not the state. An offensive symbol should not be used by the state itself but private individuals should be allowed to make that decision for themselves. If Synder paid for the team, he should be able to name it anything he wants and be entitled to legal protections. If people don't like it they can stop going to the games or buying team brands - something many Redskins fans have already done because they stink.