wayne556517
Lieutenant General
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 16,215
Flynn was a Tasmanian.
Tasmania is part of Australia.....................
Flynn was a Tasmanian.
Sometimes it is good to be careful about what you repeat; if you watch the video of that so called interview, you will see the Russel exercised great restraint against a complete a**. Frankly I think he would have been justified in popping the bloke.
Actually I can't abide rudeness, especially by the press and Rob, that interviewer was hardly just asking; rudeness is rather more than just choice of language. Free speech has nothing at all to do with civil conduct and the 4th estate has no exemption; has nothing to do with god or whether or not you are worthy. You are free to believe what you like, but yes I stand by my view that Crowe was very restrained. Now I have to ask, do you really think the interviewer knows what the appropriate accent would be for a Saxon knight of King Richards time that may have been educated in France or spent some of his youth elsewhere and most of his life in foreign lands? Perhaps he is a Oxford scholar in medieval language; or perhaps not. As for the wrong trade, actors are paid to entertain us in their chosen formats, not to take BS from morons; perhaps the interviewer should try another one.Don't agree at all.In my opinion the interviewer just asked him about the Irish in his accent,it was not posed in a rude manner and unlike the guest he used no rude language at all.The interviewer is perfectly entitled to ask any question he likes as long as it is not offensive,he has free speech,why shouldn't he pose the question?.Mr Crowe is a very good actor no doubt about it,but he's not god.We don't have to kneel down chanting 'we are not worthy'. Cannot believe you think violence would be justified in a mundane situation like that. If you can't take the heat of such a benign interview as that then you may be in the wrong trade.
Rob
Actually I can't abide rudeness, especially by the press and Rob, that interviewer was hardly just asking; rudeness is rather more than just choice of language. Free speech has nothing at all to do with civil conduct and the 4th estate has no exemption; has nothing to do with god or whether or not you are worthy. You are free to believe what you like, but yes I stand by my view that Crowe was very restrained. Now I have to ask, do you really think the interviewer knows what the appropriate accent would be for a Saxon knight of King Richards time that may have been educated in France or spent some of his youth elsewhere and most of his life in foreign lands? Perhaps he is a Oxford scholar in medieval language; or perhaps not. As for the wrong trade, perhaps the interviewer should try another one.
True - this is a different spin on the character - but not completely.. I'm sure if a movie were made that had Robin and Little John squaring off with quarter staffs on a log bridge; if Robin forced Tuck to carry him across the stream - then had a sword fight, etc... people would complain that it's the same old thing.. why bother? The Flynn version is great.. It's so good, there's no need to remake that movie.. but there is an eternal interest in Robin Hood and I'm glad they decided to make this one.
So, yes - there are some differences - but the spirit of the character is basically the same - he just goes about things differently and is BECOMING the man who becomes the legend... At least this one doesn't have a witch or Herne the Hunter, etc....
As far as accents go - not one time when I was watching the film did I think about the accents - so they're a non-issue for me.. Of course, I'm from the US - so maybe I'm not as particular about this as others will be. Although even I thought Costner was horrible as Robin.
Oh - and I don't let the actors' behaviors off the set effect the way I view a movie.. I would suspect if I went there - I wouldn't watch too many movies at all!
Jim
Well said Jim. I can only add I much prefer a great actor to the correct accent, as charming as those various regional British accents can be when done right.True - this is a different spin on the character - but not completely.. I'm sure if a movie were made that had Robin and Little John squaring off with quarter staffs on a log bridge; if Robin forced Tuck to carry him across the stream - then had a sword fight, etc... people would complain that it's the same old thing.. why bother? The Flynn version is great.. It's so good, there's no need to remake that movie.. but there is an eternal interest in Robin Hood and I'm glad they decided to make this one.
So, yes - there are some differences - but the spirit of the character is basically the same - he just goes about things differently and is BECOMING the man who becomes the legend... At least this one doesn't have a witch or Herne the Hunter, etc....
As far as accents go - not one time when I was watching the film did I think about the accents - so they're a non-issue for me.. Of course, I'm from the US - so maybe I'm not as particular about this as others will be. Although even I thought Costner was horrible as Robin.
Oh - and I don't let the actors' behaviors off the set effect the way I view a movie.. I would suspect if I went there - I wouldn't watch too many movies at all!
Jim
Well said Jim. I can only add I much prefer a great actor to the correct accent, as charming as those various regional British accents can be when done right.
Yep there is always that way to look at it,another quater staff fight in another river would have been repetitive indeed.And if you didn't notice any accent issues through the film then it can't have been that strong.
I look forward to seeing this myself,and am hoping for Master and Commander 2!
Rob
I have been waiting for M&C 2 since the ending credits of the first one. There have been many rumors about a sequel but recently it has been reported that Crowe has signed for one based on Post Captain. Let's keep our fingers crossed.Master and Commander 2 would be great, in addition to Robin Hood 2
Bert was a classic. If one buys into flying nannies (or Nuns), one can certainly buy into Van Dyke's accent. So, let's all go fly a kite. Besides, if Sir Sean Connery can play a Russian U-boat commander with a Scottish accent, what hope is there left? -- AlGreat actor doing a great accent,not a phrase that should worry either Crowe or Gibson then!
I'm guessing you're a big fan of Dick Van dyke too Bill!
Rob
This is good news. M&C was great. -- AlI have been waiting for M&C 2 since the ending credits of the first one. There have been many rumors about a sequel but recently it has been reported that Crowe has signed for one based on Post Captain. Let's keep our fingers crossed.
Bert was a classic. If one buys into flying nannies (or Nuns), one can certainly buy into Van Dyke's accent. So, let's all go fly a kite. Besides, if Sir Sean Connery can play a Russian U-boat commander with a Scottish accent, what hope is there left? -- Al
LOLOLOL. My favorite Duke role was Genghis Khan (The Conqueror). Egads, that was bad. One of the few movies that Wayne couldn't save and the one movie that killed half of Hollywood. Too bad it was ever made. Must go now to feed the birds at tuppence a bag. -- Al
No hope at all Al!
Its a lovely Oliday with Mary...no no musn't start singing!.
But I can even trump Mr Connery's effort in the Russian UBoat.I know this will upset my good friend Mr UK Reb of Bobshire,but John Waynes Cowboy Roman centurion at the Crucifixion was a classic.
'This truly was the son of God....now get on your horse...'ok I added that last bit
Rob
Who knows what the real/myth Robin Hood sounded like anyway.
atleast Crowe gave it a go.