forlornhoper
Specialist
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2009
- Messages
- 305
Since i started the "accent" debate in Robin Hood,i would like to clarify a general point on accents in movies.Todays modern movie goers demand /want more for their money,we can no longer look back to "classics" as benchmarks,this is a new age in film making and modern trained actors / actresses if they are taking the role of a historic character know they have to do the research and attempt to reincarnate this person in the genuine attempt at authenticity or at the minimum convince the viewer that their character is as real as could be replicated through their acting skills.John Wayne,Charlton Heston ,Kirk Douglas and their ilk,lived in a different age and their craft and movies should not be judged by the modern era.Russell Crowe prides himself in his craft but in my opinion he got this accent wrong but he was surrounded by british actors and director who should have known better,Ridley Scott is from South Shields and as a brit should know if a non british actor can pull off a regional british accent or not ,his own South Shields accent could not be easily duplicated by any actor born outside the North East of England its so specific.If the Robin Hood character in the movie was from Nottinghamshire,Crowe should have been embedded with a family from the region as part of his research in order to hone and perfect the regional dialect,we dont need audio tapes of 12th century british speech,few regional dialects change that much,i have not lived in Glasgow for over 30 years but still retain most of my dialect /accent,being a well travelled individual doesnt necessarily mean you will lose the accent you were born with , it may soften in time but ones accent can never be completely erradicated. Ken