Yes . . . but what's YOUR theory?
Bosun Al
HBO is also doing a Kennedy assassination film called "Parkland." There was an aritcle in USA Today today. Tom Hanks is producing and some big names are involved including Billy Bob Thorton and Paul Giamatti. http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2013/07/28/parkland-zac-efron/2537111/
Combat,
True, and the trail of dead bodies around and following the assasintaion of real people is way out of probability to accidental and natural cause.
I do not think the services of a statatician are needed when they are examined in entirety.Statistically it has never been demonstrated that these deaths are out of proportion with the general public. In addition, it would make no sense to kill witnesses after they have already told their story. Thereby adding additional participants to the conspiracy in the form of hit squads that would then have to be taken out by others to cover the trail. And the primary conspiracy theorists like Mark Lane and Oliver Stone have led lengthy lives. It's an enduring myth, but has no basis in fact.
Parkland is now out on disk. In fact I am going to watch it tonight. I doubt it will add anything to the mix expect some new theory.
I do not believe that LBJ was directly involved in the planning of JFK's assasination but I believe that he knew the people who pulled it off....It was not a surprise to LBJ....And Oswald (likely was a CIA intelligence agent) never pulled a trigger in the school book depository...he killed the police officer when he realized that he was set up as the patsy by a Southern right wing group of politically powerful, influencial individuals who wanted Kennedy taken out....definitely a coup d'etat.
Maybe; however Tague paraphrased her somewhat, and most likely abreviated it. When I saw her interviewed on camera for a doumentary episode (one of three of a series that the History channel pulled after intense pressure from the Johnson family in the 1990s) she was more explicit. She said he told her "After tomorrow those g__ d___ Kennedys will never embarrass me again" [emphasis mine]. She further stated that he repeated that exactly minus the first two words verbatum to her the day after. One would have to work really hard to find something else that was going to happen that would obtain the same results.A statement like that is open to wide interpretation unless the context in which it is given is known. For example, if you say to someone in anger "I'm going to kill you," it may be you're blowing off steam at something they did or it could mean, yes, you're going to kill them. However, when you say it and then the person is found dead, the statement, which may not have been one of intent, is used to prove motive when none may, in fact, have existed.
Maybe; however Tague paraphrased her somewhat, and most likely abreviated it. When I saw her interviewed on camera for a doumentary episode (one of three of a series that the History channel pulled after intense pressure from the Johnson family in the 1990s) she was more explicit. She said he told her "After tomorrow those g__ d___ Kennedys will never embarrass me again" [emphasis mine]. She further stated that he repeated that exactly minus the first two words verbatum to her the day after. One would have to work really hard to find something else that was going to happen that would obtain the same results.