What was the price i must have missed it
Any way hopefully all 3
Scott
I think one should consider the #'s of each being produced....with 750 of one version going around there will be lots of time to decide on it.
But a limited amount of time I think on the others considering their "limited" numbers....I don't think they'll be around for long..![]()
On another note....generic planes have their place....especially if one would wish to have more than one of the same, in theater, plane to make a multi plane diorama...it would be so possible to do....just change the call # and Voila...
And considering the price point that TG's plane comes in at....a multi plane dio is quite reasonable....that is, if space isn't an issue
I've seen real pictures of White 7, 6 and 1 all together in Italy...what a sight that would make in 1/30![]()
Ithink IXEC knows price mate but is keeping tight lipped
Scott
All of these K&C planes are still available, where I'm from......
Me-162....this came out over a year ago.....
Hurricane 1 & 2......even the limited to 400 edition...
P-51 Mustand......only Medal of Honor winning pilot in the ETO...still around....
Fw-190......for $200 clams....![]()
neither.
I'm not an airplane collector so I will be sticking to figures and armor.
I saw the second K&C Hurricane listed (K&C Dealer Website) as limited to 200 sets-did this change somewhere along the marketing process? As I understand it, the first version was limited to 400 sets and the second version to 200 sets???
Thanks,
Marc
True. Also looks like the landing gear on the TGM is missing the inward rake, although that just may be the picture angle. The TGM definitely has more wheel well detail but the KC FW would seem to have more defined underwing detail such as rivets, shell ejection ports, etc. They both look good. -- AlLooks like the TGM has the better detail underside, any pictures of the top?
True. Also looks like the landing gear on the TGM is missing the inward rake, although that just may be the picture angle. The TGM definitely has more wheel well detail but the KC FW would seem to have more defined underwing detail such as rivets, shell ejection ports, etc. They both look good. -- Al
True. Also looks like the landing gear on the TGM is missing the inward rake, although that just may be the picture angle. The TGM definitely has more wheel well detail but the KC FW would seem to have more defined underwing detail such as rivets, shell ejection ports, etc. They both look good. -- Al