I don't see anything in my posts not letting you have an opinion; it is a free country (another reason the USA is a wonderful place). ON this subject, I have a different opinion.
And I see you used a Colbert/Kimmel reference. Let's review a fact here - Colbert's show was hemorrhaging money. His ratings were down, advertising sales were down, so they made a decision to wind up the show over time. Now, those are financial facts, they are out there, but unfortunately, it is a better "story in print" to say a President was the reason you were cancelled? Really, b/c if I have followed along, most of Colbert's jokes and material centered around this President, so is one to assume without this President he has no show? But of course the real facts in the story were actually rather boring - Financially the show was in the red, ie losing a large amount of money. No one cancelled him, it was his own performance, in other words, like any other employee who underperforms, the network moved on. It happens every single television season, shows get cancelled regardless of content, it is all about the financial performance as it should be, these networks don't run on fumes, they require lots of cash. Colbert didn't produce enough and the published numbers on his show were some of the highest expenses across the entire network, that is saying something when you think about the different types of shows, etc.
TD