plasmapulse
Sergeant
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2007
- Messages
- 707
I'm sure WB appreciates any constructive criticism (in this case not much is given). There is no need to give the poor chinamen who painted the wall a good flogging. Not yet anyway .
I'm sure WB appreciates any constructive criticism (in this case not much is given). There is no need to give the poor chinamen who painted the wall a good flogging. Not yet anyway .
Maybe because of their fisheyes . I never was too fond of the old WB zulu's because of that.
I do own the last stand figure pictured and I see you gave him the helmet and gun he never had. I think the Durnfords last stand set is the best of the old WB 2000's ZW sets. Especially Durnford with his big moustache, casually popping zulus one at the time 'pow' 'pow'.
I agree with you Joachim that of all the sets Durnfords last stand was the best of the series although they were other figures throughout the series I thought were fine but few and far between. As for the Zulus the one's firing their rifles stand above the others with the exception that they all had Martini-Henry rifles where they should have been armed with either a musket or brown bess. Granted that during and after the battle at Isandlwana the Zulus did acquire them but at Rorke's Drift they were only armed with muskets and brown bess's.......The Lt.
Indeed no fisheyes. They look very nice Lt. I like the ones with full regalia best. Very nice sculpts. and I see he's wearing a british set of ammo pouches, at least the one on the left.
Nothing wrong with those Zulus except there are not enough!
Please be mindful of other Zulus on the forum.