Spitfrnd
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,923
Well Dave I don't recall saying anyone couldn't criticize anything, here or anywhere else. It would be nice if the criticisms were offered constructively in the spirit of education, as I think should be the case for any manufacturer. I would not criticize your perception of beauty despite the fact it clearly represents a choice of style that is different from my tastes. That is different that an objective evaluation of a given style for its consistency and achievement. Taste and quality are different matters, just a realism and impressionism are different styles. It is silly to say that one style is better than the other but quite reasonable to suggest that one example of one style is better than another. That is not rah-rah, only a journey toward better understanding, if one can remain relatively dispassionate and truly consider different observations.So, if we cannot criticize First Legion on First Legion's board, where should we do it? Should I go back to the Trophy board to criticize First Legion? That doesn't make sense. Matt and I disagreed on a valid historical issue about the ACW line. But say something about it, and the same crowd comes on crowing about how sublime First Legion is. And yes, I do collect the Rev War and Crusades lines, and yes, First Legion has some beautiful sculpts, in my eyes, but I don't denigrate others for finding beauty in Figarti or K&C. In my eyes, the most beautiful soldiers ever made are mid-production Trophy of Wales, but I don't tell folks they're wasting their money buying something else. And the repeated, over-the-top sales pitches almost kept me from moving into matte figure collecting. Sometimes the rah-rah stuff can do more harm than good. Just my two cents.
Dave
Last edited by a moderator: