Figarti Stuka Photos (1 Viewer)

[PanzerAce1944]

Well now that the dust has settled here in Figarti Stuka land I must say in the end of it all I am glad I bought and have the plane. With JJD pulled out and K&C
right now caught in the middle as far as going ahead or pulling the plug, This might just be the only quality 1/30 scale non wood version that the hobby will see.

 

[Mitch]

I wonder if they are thinking about a different colourway as a release still?
Mitch

 

[PanzerAce1944]

I wonder if they are thinking about a different colourway as a release still?
Mitch

To me Figarti would be foolish not to take advantage of the popularity of their first 99 planes made. I think whatever repaint or version came out in round 2 of their release will go and pre-sell out just as quick. Take the lessons learned from the release of the Rudel plane and move forward. Will K&C come out with their offering
before Figarti gets their 2nd version out ^&confuse

 

[Vezzolf]

To me Figarti would be foolish not to take advantage of the popularity of their first 99 planes made. I think whatever repaint or version came out in round 2 of their release will go and pre-sell out just as quick. Take the lessons learned from the release of the Rudel plane and move forward. Will K&C come out with their offering
before Figarti gets their 2nd version out ^&confuse

PA, I Absolutely agree with you on this point....The Figarti Stuka is an excellent plane and IMO Figarti is well ahead of their competitors in regard to WWII aircraft quality and detail....They have probably have learned much with the development and production of this stuka model....Figarti would do well to re-release another version of this iconic plane.....I would hope that whatever packaging issues exist are fully corrected.....They are putting out a great product regarding their AFV's and Planes....If they could up the production numbers to 150-200 on some of these iconic pieces even better....Elimination of breakage issues are a must to maintain consumer confidence.

 

[Thompyt]

PA, I Absolutely agree with you on this point....The Figarti Stuka is an excellent plane and IMO Figarti is well ahead of their competitors in regard to WWII aircraft quality and detail....They have probably have learned much with the development and production of this stuka model....Figarti would do well to re-release another version of this iconic plane.....I would hope that whatever packaging issues exist are fully corrected.....They are putting out a great product regarding their AFV's and Planes....If they could up the production numbers to 150-200 on some of these iconic pieces even better....Elimination of breakage issues are a must to maintain consumer confidence.

remove the cannons, add a Med or winter version, change the payloads to torpedos and Bombs/bomblets with the version. Even an A/K with shark mouth and the larger radiator.

 

[jazzeum]

Well now that the dust has settled here in Figarti Stuka land I must say in the end of it all I am glad I bought and have the plane. With JJD pulled out and K&C
right now caught in the middle as far as going ahead or pulling the plug, This might just be the only quality 1/30 scale non wood version that the hobby will see.

Glad yours came out damage free, in the end.

I would be interested to see if an AK version comes out, maybe in time for Chicago.

 

[PanzerAce1944]

Glad yours came out damage free, in the end.

I would be interested to see if an AK version comes out, maybe in time for Chicago.

Thanks Brad, Appreciate it !

remove the cannons, add a Med or winter version, change the payloads to torpedos and Bombs/bomblets with the version. Even an A/K with shark mouth and the larger radiator.

Yep, rework the bottom of the wings by removing the cannons and add the bombs,new paint scheme and there we go.

 

[Vezzolf]

remove the cannons, add a Med or winter version, change the payloads to torpedos and Bombs/bomblets with the version. Even an A/K with shark mouth and the larger radiator.

Yes, This would be the way to go{sm4}......An Me262 nitefighter would also be most welcome from Figarti^&grin.....If they get a good paint scheme for the Me 262, I would definitely be on board....I also think that the choice of materials being used by Figarti is correct.....These planes are light and have very good realistic detail. (polystone is NOT the way to go for aircraft).....the removeable wings are smart as long as they continue to fit accurately....Figarti is definitely on the right path; as long as they can avoid breakage issues and maintain quality control they have the right formula for success for their WWII Planes and AFV's.....{bravo}} Figarti.....They also should really consider increasing production numbers to 150 especially on hot sellers like Tiger Tanks and Stukas.... and as I discussed with a reputable dealer should keep a "Master Mold" to allow for re-releases when appropriate.

 

[PanzerAce1944]

Yes, This would be the way to go{sm4}......An Me262 nitefighter would also be most welcome from Figarti^&grin.....If they get a good paint scheme for the Me 262, I would definitely be on board....I also think that the choice of materials being used by Figarti is correct.....These planes are light and have very good realistic detail. (polystone is NOT the way to go for aircraft).....the removeable wings are smart as long as they continue to fit accurately....Figarti is definitely on the right path; as long as they can avoid breakage issues and maintain quality control they have the right formula for success for their WWII Planes and AFV's.....{bravo}} Figarti.....They also should really consider increasing production numbers to 150 especially on hot sellers like Tiger Tanks and Stukas.... and as I discussed with a reputable dealer should keep a "Master Mold" to allow for re-releases when appropriate.

Figarti needs to look at the glue that they were using on the Stuka, as many parts came loose or off during transit versus breaking off.I really enjoy my plane but
would hope this issue is addressed for future products !!!!

 

[Vezzolf]

Figarti needs to look at the glue that they were using on the Stuka, as many parts came loose or off during transit versus breaking off.I really enjoy my plane but
would hope this issue is addressed for future products !!!!

Question: Was the breakage in your opinion due to glue failure or mishandling when packaging??...Since mine arrived intact it is difficult to know the cause.....Also what do you think of the resin material Figarti is using for their WWII aircraft?....I think that they are on the right track.... Resin is a lighter better material then polystone in my opinion for model planes......Especially for wings on planes..... and if breakage occurs it is easier to repair resin then polystone...The BF110 and the Stuka are excellent.....Anyone with an opinion on materials being used feel free to chime in.

 

[tdubel]

Yes, This would be the way to go{sm4}......An Me262 nitefighter would also be most welcome from Figarti^&grin.....If they get a good paint scheme for the Me 262, I would definitely be on board....I also think that the choice of materials being used by Figarti is correct.....These planes are light and have very good realistic detail. (polystone is NOT the way to go for aircraft).....the removeable wings are smart as long as they continue to fit accurately....Figarti is definitely on the right path; as long as they can avoid breakage issues and maintain quality control they have the right formula for success for their WWII Planes and AFV's.....{bravo}} Figarti.....They also should really consider increasing production numbers to 150 especially on hot sellers like Tiger Tanks and Stukas.... and as I discussed with a reputable dealer should keep a "Master Mold" to allow for re-releases when appropriate.

Frank,
historically Figarti can only make between 90 and 120 of any item due to the process they use. They have to redo the "mold" for each variant. Rick posted on this process awhile ago. I agree, it would be nice if there are more of some of the items. The other option would be to re-run a popular item. As a business, I am sure they look at their process across all items and even with a hot seller, it probably still doesn't make sense across the majority of the production line. If you can only sell 90 of each item on average, that is probably where you should sit.

Tom

 

[Vezzolf]

Frank,
historically Figarti can only make between 90 and 120 of any item due to the process they use. They have to redo the "mold" for each variant. Rick posted on this process awhile ago. I agree, it would be nice if there are more of some of the items. The other option would be to re-run a popular item. As a business, I am sure they look at their process across all items and even with a hot seller, it probably still doesn't make sense across the majority of the production line. If you can only sell 90 of each item on average, that is probably where you should sit.

Tom

Tom, I respectfully disagree....I think Figarti should strongly re-consider adjusting their process so as to produce 150 ....Since the Tigers and Stukas have sold out so quickly it indicates that they need to up the production numbers.....They lose sales as a result of the existing format....They can sell well above 90 so it does not pay to sit and lose sales......What do you think of the choice of materials being used in their aircraft as per my prior post #110??

 

[tdubel]

Tom, I respectfully disagree....I think Figarti should strongly re-consider adjusting their process so as to produce 150 ....Since the Tigers and Stukas have sold out so quickly it indicates that they need to up the production numbers.....They lose sales as a result of the existing format....They can sell well above 90 so it does not pay to sit and lose sales......What do you think of the choice of materials being used in their aircraft as per my prior post #110??

Hi Frank
sorry if you misread me, I am not agreeing/disagreeing. What I meant was that their process only allows so many to be made. It is a finite process they use. My observation (not fact or knowledge) is that maybe they have not changed the process b/c on a whole (across all product lines) they average a sale of 90 pieces? I don't know.

I agree that if they can sell 150 of all, they certainly should from a business perspective change their process.

As to materials, I believe it is a poly urethane (proprietary obviously) composite type material. Not very scientific description, but I am pieceing from memory when I asked Rick that question one time. I do like the material, I think it works very well. As to fragility, as you know, more detail, unfortunately more fragility. I know that they work to find the best possible way of dealing with that, but the process is evolving.

Now as to paint flecks and loose glue, IMO, this is not good and needs to be fixed immediately, these are easy things to control IMO and should not occur. I do get somewhat infuriated by these issues. Glue is easy to deal with, more annoying than anything else, the paint just po's me. All of that said, me personally, let some things slide b/c 1. not worth getting all worked up, its a hobby and 2. when I like and respect someone personally, I cut them some slack. That's just me, everyone approaches the issues differently.

TD

 

[uksubs]

Well got mine today from Hobbybunker mint and well happy {bravo}}

 

[Mitch]

Glad it came with no hastle.
Mitch

Well got mine today from Hobbybunker mint and well happy {bravo}}

 

[PanzerAce1944]

Question: Was the breakage in your opinion due to glue failure or mishandling when packaging??...Since mine arrived intact it is difficult to know the cause.....Also what do you think of the resin material Figarti is using for their WWII aircraft?....I think that they are on the right track.... Resin is a lighter better material then polystone in my opinion for model planes......Especially for wings on planes..... and if breakage occurs it is easier to repair resin then polystone...The BF110 and the Stuka are excellent.....Anyone with an opinion on materials being used feel free to chime in.

I saw another plane the other day with rear tail section parts off. Not a break as if again the glue was not strong enough when assembled. With 4 layers of quality
foam packing material the planes seem to be held in place quite well during shipping. Simple fix for Figarti as it seems to be an adhesive issue.
As far as the material used in construction it seems very suitable, lightweight yet solid in feel.

 

[Vezzolf]

I saw another plane the other day with rear tail section parts off. Not a break as if again the glue was not strong enough when assembled. With 4 layers of quality
foam packing material the planes seem to be held in place quite well during shipping. Simple fix for Figarti as it seems to be an adhesive issue.
As far as the material used in construction it seems very suitable, lightweight yet solid in feel.

Thanks for your feedback....This is something Figarti should examine closely....The strength and effectiveness of adhesive is quite important no doubt...and....I agree the foam packaging looked adequate for protection in transit....the only other factor could be the insertion of the finished product into the box by employees....As we all know it is sometimes more difficult to place an item into its box after we remove it....If it's forced into the protctive foam something could break or dislodge.....These things are delicate and require soft hands.....Either one of these or both could be factors....Maybe we can get Rick at Figarti to comment on these issues....Not trying to put him on the spot...Just asking.....the material being used IMO is excellent and quite suitable for WWII airplane models.......Love the Figarti Stuka....An excellent model{bravo}}Figarti

 

[PanzerAce1944]

Thanks for your feedback....This is something Figarti should examine closely....The strength and effectiveness of adhesive is quite important no doubt...and....I agree the foam packaging looked adequate for protection in transit....the only other factor could be the insertion of the finished product into the box by employees....As we all know it is sometimes more difficult to place an item into its box after we remove it....If it's forced into the protctive foam something could break or dislodge.....These things are delicate and require soft hands.....Either one of these or both could be factors....Maybe we can get Rick at Figarti to comment on these issues....Not trying to put him on the spot...Just asking.....the material being used IMO is excellent and quite suitable for WWII airplane models.......Love the Figarti Stuka....An excellent model{bravo}}Figarti

Absolutely I agree !!!! It is a great plane. Love mine.....:smile2:

 

[Avenger]

Well now that the dust has settled here in Figarti Stuka land I must say in the end of it all I am glad I bought and have the plane. With JJD pulled out and K&C
right now caught in the middle as far as going ahead or pulling the plug, This might just be the only quality 1/30 scale non wood version that the hobby will see.

My friend has this plane as I saw it for the very first time yesterday. It is very nice

Robert