........
....... Modern technology and understanding still does not know everything
Mitch
Well no Mitch, but science does not admit to knowing everything, each time our civilization knows more about something, it's because the scientific method finds that information. Even with history for example, I won't know everything about an incident like the 1814 British raid on Sandy bay (Rockport, Mass) but I can know more about it each time I find a record from the National Archives, or a period letter, or even the log of the British ship involved in your National Archives. Heck, I lived for five years right on the site of the fort that was raided and knew nothing about it! I also live on an earthquake fault but if I hadn't read about what the historians and the scientists recorded about that fault, any tremor would be more irrationally frightening. If I thought the thunder god was angry I might not take actions to save my family. If I didn't know I lived on a fault at all, I wouldn't have extra food put away, water, batteries, tools etc.
A recent power blackout had my daughter spooked because she's recovering from two heart surgeries. Technology saved her in the case of her heart and this minor technology failure was remedied by my neighbor on his iPhone. He was able to find that the blackout was only local by going to a newspaper website. Then he called his wife to get pizza where she was (with power).
Here's another short case of the Ancient Aliens series on The History Channel. There's a character on that show who claimed that a UFO sighting AND abduction happened in colonial Boston. If you look at a copy of the source, the journal of John Winthrop, the
1825 editor was able to explain the incident as marsh gas and the incoming tide. A man almost 200 years ago had a natural explanation of what a 17th Century man thought was mysterious.