I don't know but maybe it should be a Fosters larger comming from Oz
Two points: first with regard to the scale of the new jeeps, John was referring to the earlier Arnhem Jeeps from the original Arnhem series (which was 1:32 scale). The new jeeps are noticably larger (I set them next to each original jeeps, and they are longer, wider and taller). Additionally, with regard to the Tiger tank, it is noted that the deck was six feet tall (and accordingly should be at least the height of the figures). If you look at the photos of the new Tunesian Tiger, the deck appears to be as tall as (if not slightly taller than) the figures. Here's a link to the photo: https://www.kingandcountry.com/Photos/AK/AK039(SL)(L).jpg
I had a few Aussie room mates whilst living along the California coast in the 90s. As I remember from them, our (U.S.) equivalent to FOSTERS is Colt 45 and or Old English 800...so we better pick out something a bit better! I also learned that rooting for a "Team" has a whole other meaning
I have no arguement with the new Tunisian Tiger as it is clear that it is the correct 1/30 scale. Without doubt it's the best tank that K & C have produced. However, I'll be waiting to see the Honour Bound example(s) before I part with US $199 for the K & C version because HB still have the edge on them imo
The scale problem is with most of the earlier K & C tanks including the Panthers, King Tigers, and Tigers, including the Winter Tiger as well as the Wittman Tiger that Old Tanker was particularly upset about. Btw I do have the Honour Bound (Barkmann) Panther and it does overshadow the K & C armoured vehicles I have.
well I have the K&C summer panther and the HB jadpanther and there is no difference in the height of the decking nor no noticable difference in scale......
The Jagdpanther had the same chassis as the panther hence the lower hull is the same size on both tanks and there's no difference between the lower hull on the K&C summer panther and the HB jagdpantherWell that's not surprising because the Jagdpanther is a bit smaller than a Panther.
I mainly collect figures, so I am a stickler about figure accuracy more than tank/vehicle accuracy. Since this hobby is called "toy soldiers", not "toy tanks", I think the focus of toy soldier companies should remain on turning out the best and most realistic figures possible, which surpass anything available in the 1/32 modelling world in my opinion. In my collection, armor is there to compliment and provide an artistic backdrop for the figures so it’s not the absolute end of the world if scale isn’t 100%. Because I can use pieces as background display to fool the eye, I remain first and foremost concerned about historical accuracy (does the armor LOOK right by itself and are equipment/uniforms used in the right period etc.) and the SIZE/scale of those items is of secondary concern. Now in cases where figures have to actually ride in vehicles like jeeps, then scale is absolutely critical, but it’s my impression that K&C has generally done a better job on the scale of those items because it was more obvious if they were too small.
Nevertheless, the fact remains K&C has misjudged scale on several of their tanks in the past and I sincerely hope they and all the manufacturers continue taking scale more seriously as this hobby progresses. We can only benefit if they do. Maybe when word of the scale problem with the old sets becomes more well known it will help lower some of their ebay prices? Probably not though – old K&C sets seem to have no problem maintaining their value as collectibles, scale models or not.
The Jagdpanther had the same chassis as the panther hence the lower hull is the same size on both tanks and there's no difference between the lower hull on the K&C summer panther and the HB jagdpanther
will post a photo of both together when I figure out the intricacies of posting photo'sThe Jagdpanther is shorter and lower overall but I have to admit the decks look close in most pics of the actual vehicles. Well, I'm ok with admitting when I'm wrong but as I have neither model I'd want to see pictures of them together (with a standard 1/30 size K & C figure) before I got to carried away
Must say i'd not thought of it like that.When i discovered K&C i just went for the Figures and Tanks in excactly the same way.Both as important as the other.But as you say it is called 'Toy soldiers' and not 'Toy soldiers and Tanks'.So i guess i maybe in a minority here in collecting both as avidly.Do many others here collect both?.
Rob
will post a photo of both together when I figure out the intricacies of posting photo's
Must say i'd not thought of it like that.When i discovered K&C i just went for the Figures and Tanks in excactly the same way.Both as important as the other.But as you say it is called 'Toy soldiers' and not 'Toy soldiers and Tanks'.So i guess i maybe in a minority here in collecting both as avidly.Do many others here collect both?.
Rob
I use this website to store my pics for forum posting: http://imageshack.us/
Must say i'd not thought of it like that.When i discovered K&C i just went for the Figures and Tanks in excactly the same way.Both as important as the other.But as you say it is called 'Toy soldiers' and not 'Toy soldiers and Tanks'.So i guess i maybe in a minority here in collecting both as avidly.Do many others here collect both?.
Rob